Trialbyfire Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 You're joking, right? No man (and the operative word here is MAN) in his right mind wants a submissive wife, nor does he need one in order to feel like a man. One of the reasons I married my wife was because she was my professional, educational, intellectual equal. It makes for mutuality, stimulating conversation and constant challenge -- challenge to be the best person I can be and challenge to stay even with her. I can think of nothing worse than a mate who is a vapid sychophant. How utterly false and totally boring. Protection should be instinctual and borne of love rather than required or contrived. YUCK! This is what I mean. Its as simple as this-anyone who purposely seeks to find a submissive partner gets intimidated easily and is a control freak. Now who would want anyone like that? Exactly. These two men understand what it takes to make for dynamite relationships. When you have an equal partnership, man, the chemistry and positive synergies between two strong people determined to make things work for the better, can't be matched. It's incredible. But then maybe people are willing to settle. I'm not and from the sounds of it, neither are C or Rid. Link to post Share on other sites
alphamale Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 When you have an equal partnership, man, the chemistry and positive synergies between two strong people determined to make things work for the better, can't be matched. It's incredible. thats such bull****!! idealistic baloney Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 thats such bull****!! idealistic baloney That's because you've never experienced it before, have you? I have. Link to post Share on other sites
alphamale Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 That's because you've never experienced it before, have you? I have. I have no interest in experiencing it. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 I have no interest in experiencing it. Let me guess, the Earth is flat too... Link to post Share on other sites
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 I don't blame you, Zeta. I wouldn't either if I wasn't up to the challenge. Thanklfully, I am. Link to post Share on other sites
Pyro Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 I don't blame you, Zeta. I wouldn't either if I wasn't up to the challenge. Thanklfully, I am. I would have thought that guys want a woman who challenges them intellectually and in other ways as well, but I guess not. At least not all of them. Link to post Share on other sites
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 Alas, thou speakest the truth! To me, that's the epitomy of whipped! I can think of nothing less stimulating, interesting or desireable than a Stepford wife. Any man worthy of the name wants, welcomes and seeks challenge. Link to post Share on other sites
Author PandorasBox Posted July 14, 2007 Author Share Posted July 14, 2007 a Stepford wife. Exactly what is a Stepford wife anyway? And no, I haven't seen the movie. Link to post Share on other sites
alphamale Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 Exactly what is a Stepford wife anyway? its a bleeding robot Link to post Share on other sites
Author PandorasBox Posted July 14, 2007 Author Share Posted July 14, 2007 its a bleeding robot Sounds messy. :laugh: Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 Sounds messy. :laugh: It's a movie about the men in a suburb that kill off their real wives and replace them with submissive robot wives that look like their real wives. Not messy at all. Better than a puppy...I guess... Link to post Share on other sites
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 You're joking, right? No man (and the operative word here is MAN) in his right mind wants a submissive wife, nor does he need one in order to feel like a man. One of the reasons I married my wife was because she was my professional, educational, intellectual equal. It makes for mutuality, stimulating conversation and constant challenge -- challenge to be the best person I can be and challenge to stay even with her. I can think of nothing worse than a mate who is a vapid sychophant. How utterly false and totally boring. Protection should be instinctual and borne of love rather than required or contrived. YUCK! This is what I mean. Exactly. These two men understand what it takes to make for dynamite relationships. When you have an equal partnership, man, the chemistry and positive synergies between two strong people determined to make things work for the better, can't be matched. It's incredible. But then maybe people are willing to settle. I'm not and from the sounds of it, neither are C or Rid. I would have thought that guys want a woman who challenges them intellectually and in other ways as well, but I guess not. At least not all of them. You all are misunderstanding what everyone is trying to say. I think a lot of what Curmudgeon’s saying is rhetoric. What looks like positive synergy to him, may look like his wife is the one really running a big portion of the show to us. Sometimes we can’t see things about ourselves that others can. When I hear a statement like “She's teaching him manners!” when it comes to the conduct of being a lady, It’s evident that his wife is “head” majority of the time. He’s even stated that HE avoids arguing with his wife, which clearly indicates that he surrenders when she’s disputing. People can philosophize all they want on her but their actions, most of the time, say differently. I do believe in positive synergism at times but not every time. Sometimes you have to step back and let you partner handle certain situations if need be. They’re not always going to need your consent of approval every time, as if you’re making business decisions for the company. When we use the word submissive we’re not talking about slavery or people who want dumb partners. We’re talking about stepping down at times and letting your SO take the stand. For Instance: No matter how right you are in an argument you’re humble enough to end peacefully so that it won’t progress further. That’s being submissive.Letting your SO take care of a situation when he/she says they want to handle it. That’s being submissiveWhen your SO is driving, you don’t continuously argue what way is the right way to go. You sit back and let them drive. That’s being submissive. You don’t have to execute or decide every little thing in synchronized formation. (You know I’m right). No one’s saying submit 24/7. Be interdependent. He lets you take control of certain situation and you let him take control of certain situation. This gives freedom in the relationship. What couple relies on synergism all the time? If they’re telling you they do, they’re full of rhetoric. Link to post Share on other sites
alphamale Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 this whole concept of a "relationship of equals" is a bunch of hooey Link to post Share on other sites
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 Anytime Curm or Rid has said, "I'll let my GF/wife handle it" they've showing a sign of submissiveness. They're just spitting a bunch of rhetoric! Link to post Share on other sites
alphamale Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 well thats what happens when men are brainwashed by women Link to post Share on other sites
Tyra Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 How do you know if a man is whipped? I was out at a resturant with some friends the other night. I saw a man being really nice towards his wife. He was being sweet, and pulled her chair out for her. Seemed to really be listening to her while they were talking. Got the door for her as they left etc. Well that is cool with me, looks like he has respect. But as we were eating a friend of mine makes the commet, "Oh he is probably whipped, and thats why he does those things for her." I couldn't help but think, wtf? Just because a man is nice, and respectful he is whipped? So what do you think is considered a whipped man? A man doesn't have to be nice and respectful to be whipped. A man can be this way even if he's not in a relationship, you know. I consider whipped to be, if he does everything a woman tells him to do, and she only has to give him a certain look.And he knows the consequences if he doesn't do what she says.If the wife says she want her husband in the house at a certain time, no matter who's he with, and he respond with a o.k, then he's wiped. Link to post Share on other sites
LoveLace Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 A man doesn't have to be nice and respectful to be whipped. A man can be this way even if he's not in a relationship, you know. I consider whipped to be, if he does everything a woman tells him to do, and she only has to give him a certain look.And he knows the consequences if he doesn't do what she says.If the wife says she want her husband in the house at a certain time, no matter who's he with, and he respond with a o.k, then he's wiped. I agree totally. I think people use the term "whipped" a little too loosely at times. When the wife is non-stop giving him orders and he follows them without any question, that's what I call "whipped". If the genders are reversed, it might be considered as being some form of abuse...but technically it should be called abusive either way, cuz the reason someone is being so obediant must only be because of threats/consequences... Link to post Share on other sites
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 well thats what happens when men are brainwashed by women I woman uses her emotions like a knight uses his sword. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts