troutie jr Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 did you find your dog? All this suing thing is just plain ridiculous... I think the OW would have to be an idiot like this one case where she tried to get into the estate... then she got sued back... was a 'zoo'... What would that tell you? If the BS sues he/she doesn't have much self esteem does it? Can't believe life exsists without a cheat. Link to post Share on other sites
their_here Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 did you find your dog? All this suing thing is just plain ridiculous... I think the OW would have to be an idiot like this one case where she tried to get into the estate... then she got sued back... was a 'zoo'... Ya, manho. going to town on the coffeemaker. Trout told me what to do. damn dog. Link to post Share on other sites
their_here Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Sorry NoIDidn't I did not mean to offend you. It just so happened that you were in this conversation and I see you mentioned your husband had cheated on you so I thought I could ask you these things. How does a person kiss their husband/wife after they have been kissing the genitals of another person? Also since you are pro suing a person who a cheater cheats with why would you let your husband's mistress get away like that? And I know the catholic church considers sex before marriage a cardinal sin and so a lot of catholics engage in anal sex instead to get around the whole virgin thing, maybe your husband had anal sex and feels he didn't have real sex with his misstress? I'm just saying.... Maybe thats why some much crap coming out of they mouths. Their backsides are stuffed up. oh wait packed up. no, no. filled up. Link to post Share on other sites
bluebluesky Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 This thread started pretty good but it seems to have spun out of control. Did the OP get the answer and advice that they needed? Here's that Troutie jr. guy again. I just saw him posting on a different thread. Doesn't really focus on the post, but does seem to enjoy the comic relief. In a way, the levity is... I guess, fun. Does anyone know if the Troutie Jr. guy is related to that other trout I've seen around here? The blowjobsfortrout (or whatever the handle is)? I'm trying to figure out if they are related or if one is a takeoff of the other. Link to post Share on other sites
NoIDidn't Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 This thread was civil and respectful - even with different opinions expressed. Are the folks that have started the harrassing and insulting posts here to converse or something more sinister? This is my last response to you all. You know who you are. I hope you had your fun. Link to post Share on other sites
Gwyneth Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I don't think anyone is mocking any particular person on here. I just think these people, including moi--think it's a Crazy idea and act to sue the OP. It amazes me what people sue for these days. Link to post Share on other sites
pollywag Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I agree with Gweneth no one is mocking anyone if you don't want to answer questions why not just say so? Ok can I ask this? If a person has anal leakage and they go over to someone's house as a guest and doesn't tell the host and sits on their couch can the host sue the visitor for leaving a stain on their couch? This is an open question anyone can answer. Link to post Share on other sites
troutie jr Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I don't think anyone is mocking any particular person on here. I just think these people, including moi--think it's a Crazy idea and act to sue the OP. It amazes me what people sue for these days. That's right and having a bit of fun in the process. Nothing wrong with that! Everyone had their say here! Link to post Share on other sites
OpenBook Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I agree with Gweneth no one is mocking anyone if you don't want to answer questions why not just say so? Ok can I ask this? If a person has anal leakage and they go over to someone's house as a guest and doesn't tell the host and sits on their couch can the host sue the visitor for leaving a stain on their couch? This is an open question anyone can answer. Well of course! But I'm not sure how well the case would go in court. The defendant could always deny it... "No I didn't, Your Honor." Link to post Share on other sites
troutie jr Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Well of course! But I'm not sure how well the case would go in court. The defendant could always deny it... "No I didn't, Your Honor." :lmao::lmao: This lady's got it going on! Link to post Share on other sites
pollywag Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 :lmao: I don't allow pets on my couch because it's like someone sitting on my couch with no panties!:lmao: oh I just learned to use this quote button let's see what happenstorutie that was hilarious, no panties no couchie for you. and Openbook "NoIdidn't" your honour you're killing me here LMAO Link to post Share on other sites
troutie jr Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 oh I just learned to use this quote button let's see what happenstorutie that was hilarious, no panties no couchie for you. and Openbook "NoIdidn't" your honour you're killing me here LMAO NoIdidn't allow pets on my sofa's. Because if I did, I could say "NoIdidn't" and then I would be telling an aweful lie. Then I have to forgive myself and I would be caught up in this turmoil for the rest of my life living an illusion while thinking my sofa has no gizz when in in fact it does. "Dear guest...please make yourself at home. This is my happy place! See how fresh and clean we live" Its so perfect! Link to post Share on other sites
pollywag Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 NoIdidn't allow pets on my sofa's. Because if I did, I could say "NoIdidn't" and then I would be telling an aweful lie. Then I have to forgive myself and I would be caught up in this turmoil for the rest of my life living an illusion while thinking my sofa has no gizz when in in fact it does. "Dear guest...please make yourself at home. This is my happy place! See how fresh and clean we live" Its so perfect! OH no you DIDN! LMAO Link to post Share on other sites
troutie jr Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 oh I just learned to use this quote button let's see what happenstorutie that was hilarious, no panties no couchie for you. and Openbook "NoIdidn't" your honour you're killing me here LMAO I could get my pet a thong, and take it to the dog groomer for a trim:lmao: That would work. Sofa is all yours Rex:lmao: Link to post Share on other sites
squeak Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Divorce does cost a ton of money, correct. But how exactly can this alienation of affection be completely proven beyond reasonable doubt? For example, say a H feels he has alienation of affection from W. After years of trying to fix this problem he eventually looks out of the marriage and has an affair. The W wants a divorce and sues the OW for alienation of affection? This is only one example of how I foresee a million different loopholes. And no, I dont believe people should be able to sue because they are "hurt". My boss hurts my feelings sometimes. Can I sue him? No - because its life. However, my if my boss breaks the UK law and sexually harrasses me? I'm protected by my law to sue him. In this specific case, where the husband deliberately sets out after the other woman, suing would be ridicoulous, as you stated in the example above. But where it could be proven that an OW/OM pursued, prompted, prodded and aggressively went after the MM/MW, then I absolutely believe all parties involved should get the comeuppance due. Too bad opinions don't matter, but I'd like to see all countries support that. People need to fear legal action to curb immoral behavior like I stated above. I find it odd that people can sue for physical harm and intent, but the emotional, being relative and subjective, is almost completely overlooked by the system. Or, to put it another way, if someone hurts another, by going after a person involved in marriage, they should not get away scot free. I know I'm going to get blasted, but if anyone here has ever seen a single woman at the office bending down and letting 'ol MM see down her blouse and stopping by his desk to bring him coffee because he looks so down, I think that is evil behavior. Link to post Share on other sites
pollywag Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I could get my pet a thong, and take it to the dog groomer for a trim:lmao: That would work. Sofa is all yours Rex:lmao: But seriously we should be able to sue people and dogs and objects.Like when when you stub your toe on the coffe table, you should be able to sue furniture too! Heck why stop there if that coffe table comes with end tables you can ask the court to throw in some child support too? Link to post Share on other sites
troutie jr Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 But seriously we should be able to sue people and dogs and objects.Like when when you stub your toe on the coffe table, you should be able to sue furniture too! Heck why stop there if that coffe table comes with end tables you can ask the court to throw in some child support too? There you have it! Support payments for EVERYTHING! Why work? Let's just sue the ass off the entire planet's existance. Link to post Share on other sites
milx Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Ok. Now this is just too much. Are you really deprive of money?? Is your H not making enough? Or are you not making enough money? Go work triple shifts or something. Why take money out of another human being? Oh because she gives your H good sex? My oh my.... Link to post Share on other sites
underpants Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 This thread is awesome. With the correct IP addresses and linkage a whole lot of cases could be validated. Or at the very least introduced as evidence. Who knows what a jury may decide? Please, continue. btw, All the time these cases are brought. All the time. Link to post Share on other sites
pollywag Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 This thread is awesome. With the correct IP addresses and linkage a whole lot of cases could be validated. Or at the very least introduced as evidence. Who knows what a jury may decide? Please, continue. btw, All the time these cases are brought. All the time. Oh yes I forgot about that one we should add suing people for freedom of speech to the list of absurd suits. Last I checked we are not living in Singapore.But they do make underwear there or no sorry that's China, the other communist place. Not that Singapore is still communist and all... Link to post Share on other sites
KATANYA Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 In this specific case, where the husband deliberately sets out after the other woman, suing would be ridicoulous, as you stated in the example above. But where it could be proven that an OW/OM pursued, prompted, prodded and aggressively went after the MM/MW, then I absolutely believe all parties involved should get the comeuppance due. Too bad opinions don't matter, but I'd like to see all countries support that. People need to fear legal action to curb immoral behavior like I stated above. I find it odd that people can sue for physical harm and intent, but the emotional, being relative and subjective, is almost completely overlooked by the system. Or, to put it another way, if someone hurts another, by going after a person involved in marriage, they should not get away scot free. So, basically, we have to assume that an OP can unilaterally convince an otherwise happy, honest, committed spouse to have an A and that excuses the WS but makes the OP responsible????? I don't think so! Maybe I've led a sheltered life or something but I don't know of ANY affairs that began because the WS was lured into an A unwillingly or through coersion.......In my Country being chased unwillingly and being continually prompted for sex (married or not) constitutes sexually harassment, not an affair. If this were the case, why can't the WS sue the OP for prompting him/her to have an affair? Why leave it to the BS to sue? Where would it end. I think we should just go back to "keeping it simple".......the OP (providing their single) has made NO commitment to another person, is not bound to a relationship by law, and has not code of conduct that prevents them from entering into or leaving a relationship at will.......if a WS decides to pursue a relationship outside their marriage and is caught, the BS needs to focus her/his anger, rage and retaliation against the person who OWED her/him the respect, trust and commitment that was broken! As far as having fear of legal action to curb immoral behavior, let's all admit that legal action DOES NOT curb actions of those who WANT to commit a crime.....that's why we have overcrowded prisons full of murderers, rapists, drug dealers and the like! Do you really want to spend any more of your tax dollars building more penal systems to house adulterers? Do you want to bog the court systems down further dealing with these kind of cases? I can see a whole new legal specialty for attorneys and can't imagine who would think the money, time and energy that this type of trial would take couldn't be better spent by just getting on with your life! I know I'm going to get blasted, but if anyone here has ever seen a single woman at the office bending down and letting 'ol MM see down her blouse and stopping by his desk to bring him coffee because he looks so down, I think that is evil behavior. I'm assuming you are not serious here......'ol MM is going to look down her shirt if he has the chance because ALL men do! Instinctively men (and women) look if they won't get caught! Likewise, bringing over a coffee is a little bit off the mark as far as being a lead in for an A...Gosh, I've brought co-workers coffee when they've looked like they needed a 'pick me up' and its never led to hot and heavy romance on the boardroom table...maybe I need to wear a lower cut blouse or find a better office to work in! Poor 'ol MM doesn't stand a chance - I guess once they are married they lose all ability to have control over their own actions and will. And those 'evil' single women - who ever let them lose on our poor MM knowing they would not be able to resist? Sorry to be so sarcastic but let's put the blame where it belongs! Link to post Share on other sites
KATANYA Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 But where it could be proven that an OW/OM pursued, prompted, prodded and aggressively went after the MM/MW, then I absolutely believe all parties involved should get the comeuppance due. By the way, who would be the one giving the proof that the OP did pursue, prompt and aggressively pursue the MM/MW.....let me guess, the MM/MW who are in the process of trying to save their a$$.....sounds like unbiased testimony to me! Link to post Share on other sites
pollywag Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 "I know I'm going to get blasted, but if anyone here has ever seen a single woman at the office bending down and letting 'ol MM see down her blouse and stopping by his desk to bring him coffee because he looks so down, I think that is evil behavior.".....................................................................I think that people who get offended by men admiring women at work do so because they don't get admired much themselves. Should we sue good looking women for getting admired by all men alike? Yeah why not sue hot women too. Link to post Share on other sites
pollywag Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 But where it could be proven that an OW/OM pursued, prompted, prodded and aggressively went after the MM/MW, then I absolutely believe all parties involved should get the comeuppance due. By the way, who would be the one giving the proof that the OP did pursue, prompt and aggressively pursue the MM/MW.....let me guess, the MM/MW who are in the process of trying to save their a$$.....sounds like unbiased testimony to me! Good question. I suppose the cheater is the witness. If so we all know if the cheater steps up to testify the battle is lost because a cheater can outlie a lawyer anyday. Link to post Share on other sites
milx Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I think I should stop looking at people's dogs too.... I might get sued. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts