Tony T Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 The head of the American Red Cross resigned after it was learned he was having an affair with a subordinate. It didn't help that he was married with children. Isn't it wonderful that people in high places can't be discrete.... Go here to read the story: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21994150/ Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Non-frat rules are there for a reason. If you can't keep it zipped, you risk...exposure... Link to post Share on other sites
KenzieAbsolutely Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 i agree, tbf. i wonder what would have happened if the 'partner in crime' was someone outside the red cross. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Probably not much, unless it's leaked to the press. Link to post Share on other sites
Leia Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Oh see what affairs do to people... Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Oh see what affairs do to people... Affairs do a lot of damage to everyone involved. Link to post Share on other sites
Leia Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Affairs do a lot of damage to everyone involved. Yes but some chose to think that it doesn't do any damage at all ~ that I don't get. Link to post Share on other sites
head.heart& hand Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 This is a sensitive subject for me, and one that I have given much thought. ....Some time ago, I came upon a brilliant author whose views I respect very much (and now share). Here's an excerpt from Steven Carter, Professor of Law at Yale University, Entitled: “The Power of Character” --In Defense of Privacy. "It is a tricky matter to insist that the employees of the state meet moral standards that the rest of us are free to flout. Public officials are drawn from the same cultural cauldron that produces the rest of us. If we tell them that they and not we must be sinless, we will most likely discourage from service only those who really are morally better than the rest of us — people of true integrity who have, like all of us, done some wrong in life, but who are not willing to have the scandal-hunting press destroy their reputations and perhaps their families. Instead, we will find ourselves stuck with people of less integrity, who are quite willing to lie if the private wrongs they have done become publicly known". If you like what you read, the entire article can be found here: http://www.josephsoninstitute.org/poc/essay.htm and if you like the above I highly recommend his books as well. Link to post Share on other sites
head.heart& hand Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 This is a sensitive subject for me, and one that I have given much thought. ....Some time ago, I came upon a brilliant author whose views I respect very much (and now share). Here's an excerpt from Steven Carter, Professor of Law at Yale University, Entitled: “The Power of Character” --In Defense of Privacy. "It is a tricky matter to insist that the employees of the state meet moral standards that the rest of us are free to flout. Public officials are drawn from the same cultural cauldron that produces the rest of us. If we tell them that they and not we must be sinless, we will most likely discourage from service only those who really are morally better than the rest of us — people of true integrity who have, like all of us, done some wrong in life, but who are not willing to have the scandal-hunting press destroy their reputations and perhaps their families. Instead, we will find ourselves stuck with people of less integrity, who are quite willing to lie if the private wrongs they have done become publicly known". If you like what you read, the entire article can be found here: http://www.josephsoninstitute.org/poc/essay.htm and if you like the above I highly recommend his books as well. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Yes but some chose to think that it doesn't do any damage at all ~ that I don't get. I know. You read about this kind of attitude on LS, all the time. Since I'm an example of collateral damage, my ex-H and his ex-OW, examples of consequences, I think all of us can vouch how damaging, it was. Btw, the only thing that saved my ex-H's job, due to the non-frat rules, was his excellent legal counsel. It cost him a pretty penny, respect and reputation. Link to post Share on other sites
Pyro Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Yes but some chose to think that it doesn't do any damage at all ~ that I don't get. Its the selfish factor. The worlds not a perfect place you know. Link to post Share on other sites
child_of_isis Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 He resigned due to 'family matters'. Ow kept her job. I am betting OW was going to bust him out with a sexual harassment suit. So, to keep the sordid details under wrap, he threw in the towel. Karma. Hang on to your hats. We are going to see karma working overtime on cheaters. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 He resigned due to 'family matters'. Ow kept her job. I am betting OW was going to bust him out with a sexual harassment suit. So, to keep the sordid details under wrap, he threw in the towel. Karma. Hang on to your hats. We are going to see karma working overtime on cheaters. I think she already did that because the Board of Directors already forced his resignation. Link to post Share on other sites
Woggle Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 I don't agree with cheating but if both parties were consenting and he was doing a good job he should not have been fired. Personal life and job performance are two seperate things. Most of our good presidents screwed around on the side and it didn't affect things. Link to post Share on other sites
nadiaj2727 Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 ....Some time ago, I came upon a brilliant author whose views I respect very much (and now share). Here's an excerpt from Steven Carter, Professor of Law at Yale University, Entitled: “The Power of Character” --In Defense of Privacy. No way HH&H I can't believe you just quoted Steven Carter, I love this author. When I started realizing I was involved in an AFFAIR instead of a relationship with someone who was getting divorced, I decided I wanted to become a better person. Reading Carter's book "Integrity" helped me realize that everything I'd been doing was the opposite of integrity. His view is that integrity is about: 1. Discerning the right or wrong thing to do -- takes active moral reflection 2. ACTING upon what we believe to be right 3. SAYING what we're doing and why. I began to realize that there can NEVER be integrity in affairs because even if a person does # 1 (really thinks about it and thinks they're doing the right thing) and # 2 (begins or continues to stay in an affair b/c they think it's the right thing to do), they can never truly do # 3, which he says is most important: they don't tell people "I love this man/ woman, so I'm with him/ her, despite the fact they he's/ she's married, because I think it's the right thing to do." If they DID, it wouldn't be an affair, because their spouse would say "goodbye or shape up" (which usually happens only after the unfaithful spouse is CAUGHT b/c they didn't have the integrity to own up to their supposed belief and actions... they had to hide it in secret, which is not integrity), and MM would either be with OW or MM... not both, unless it was an open marriage or polygamy etc. I love this author, it's so cool to find someone else who does too. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 There are three reasons for non-frat rules: So that anyone in power can't put pressure on someone below them, to force a sexual relationship. (non-consenting adults)To limit the number of liasons, therefore, the number of civil suits from valid sexual harassment suits. (non-consenting adults)To limit the number of liasons, therefore, the number of civil suits from invalid sexual harassment suits. (consenting adults but unethical suit) Link to post Share on other sites
Impudent Oyster Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 I know. You read about this kind of attitude on LS, all the time. Since I'm an example of collateral damage, my ex-H and his ex-OW, examples of consequences, I think all of us can vouch how damaging, it was. Btw, the only thing that saved my ex-H's job, due to the non-frat rules, was his excellent legal counsel. It cost him a pretty penny, respect and reputation. Ugh, your husband cheated with a co-worker? How cliche. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Ugh, your husband cheated with a co-worker? How cliche. He had two ONS with junior staff members, after cocktails... He's an Executive VP. The primary OW blew the whistle on him. Link to post Share on other sites
Impudent Oyster Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 I don't agree with cheating but if both parties were consenting and he was doing a good job he should not have been fired. Personal life and job performance are two seperate things. Most of our good presidents screwed around on the side and it didn't affect things. But they didn't screw around with co-workers..that's where it gets messy. Who's to say the OW wasn't being given a raise for reasons other than job performance? What if there's a break-up that results in negative professional repercussions? If you're stupid enough to screw around with a subordinate, it shows a clear lack of judgment. I don't know that I'd want anyone that clueless running my company. Link to post Share on other sites
Impudent Oyster Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 He had two ONS with junior staff members, after cocktails... He's an Executive VP. The primary OW blew the whistle on him. Oh brother...my husband has the same position, and I can't tell you how many times I've heard this kind of story before. They think they're masters of the universe, don't they? And the OW make them feel oh so special. I'm sure they wouldn't give them the time of day if these guys were pumping their gas. Link to post Share on other sites
Impudent Oyster Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Just curious TBF, she blew the whistle on him to his employer, or to you, or everyone? Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Oh brother...my husband has the same position, and I can't tell you how many times I've heard this kind of story before. They think they're masters of the universe, don't they? And the OW make them feel oh so special. I'm sure they wouldn't give them the time of day if these guys were pumping their gas. There's no doubt there was some of this going on, although the two ONSs were new chicklets on the block so claimed they didn't know he was married. Just curious TBF, she blew the whistle on him to his employer, or to you, or everyone? Yes, the OW blew the whistle on his employer. She didn't work for the same firm but worked in the same industry. She got around... Edit: I should explain that she did this after he threw her under the bus. It was her act of revenge on him. Link to post Share on other sites
head.heart& hand Posted November 29, 2007 Share Posted November 29, 2007 [quote name=nadiaj I love this author' date=' it's so cool to find someone else who does too. [/quote] Cheers nadia! Too bad we can't grab a glass of wine and jam about the book---and other good finds. And yes, I read his book integrity as well! Wouldn't you just love to take a class from Stephen Carter at Yale--- I suppose revisiting the book should provide all the answers I need (perhaps for others too) and here I was searching on LS!-- But hey, everything is connected, so while reading a LS thread, I immediatley went to Carter, and to his article regarding privacy, and to his books -- and unfortunatley, to a very scary time where my story nearly hit the new stand. Phew, and Thank god for attorneys ( knowing you're in this arena you might just say, you're welcome). --more of that connection thing I guess. Back to Carter: Lets see: 1. Discerning the right or wrong thing to do -- takes active moral reflection 2. ACTING upon what we believe to be right I believe the right thing to do is to separate (nc) from the mm to let him resolve his marital issues one way or another, without interfering. Agree? Although the course in arriving at this point has been long and unsteady, this is where I currently am. 3. SAYING what we're doing and why. check ( although this will be my mm's part to tell his wife). check, check, check--but who am I fooling --uncheck (with a red pen!) Although I'm trying to do the right thing now---after much anguish, ambivalence, disappointment (mostly in myself but yes, my mm too), and a heap of guilt, I can hardly pretend that what I am doing now is acting with integrity. I 'm struggling. I'm swollen. I miss my dearest friend terribly and I'm selfishly motivated to try to make right, what has never been right. As I write this, I'm still tilting at windmills with Carter books in hand-- Boy do I have a ways to go! I know what I have to do -- yet I so miss the soulful connection of this man. Thanks so much for being here Nadia, I respect you. Link to post Share on other sites
Gwyneth Posted November 29, 2007 Share Posted November 29, 2007 I don't think it's fair when affairs are exposed in the media. It's no one's business, really. What Bill Clinton had to go through is just humiliating and sooo unecessary. Fine, he had oral with his intern, yeah, at the White House or wherever, while he should have been working, and he was married (still is, yes), and yes, very bad...bad billy, but c'mon! What the media put him through is just wrong...WRONG! I'm my own hypocrite. Well, I always loathed Angelina Jolie and her cryptic ways, but when her claimed affair with Brad Pitt hit the air waves, I was angry she was this homewrecker, and here I am... I used that as just another excuse not to like the woman. I do not judge celebrities by their personal affairs. I judge them by what they represent--movies, songs, television, etc. It's just not fair their affairs get exposed. I guess that's the cost of being famous. Link to post Share on other sites
meetme26 Posted November 29, 2007 Share Posted November 29, 2007 My xMM works in a state and in a field where they are terminated on the spot for having "extramarital relations". A few of his co-workers have been exposed for having sex on the job. I miss our R sometimes and since he has now chosen to "work on his marriage", I think about making that "anonymous" phone call. (But it's only a thought.....) Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts