Numerouno Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 This is just an idea, so feel free to take it with a pinch of salt. .... If most humans essentially only want the positive aspects (from the other person) in a relationship, why don't some people (those who can afford it) have a "relationship contract" instead of a marriage contract? For example... Mary doesn't like the idea of being tied down in a marriage. So, she sets up a weekly relationship contract and advertises in the paper for a suitable partner. Bob sees it, they meet and they both sign the contract. In the contract Mary essentially gets to call the shots. In other words, Bob is there to do what Mary wants him to do. However, Bob is allowed to refuse anything that Mary asks for. Once Bob does this, the contract is terminated and the two people go their separate ways. The contract contains the following... * Mary will provide Bob with the basics (food, drinks and accommodation.) * Mary will provide the house keys to Bob. * Mary will pay all household bills/expenses. * Mary will pay Bob $200 every week if he has met the conditions of the contract at the end of the week. * Mary can terminate the contract at any stage (not negotiable.) * If the contract is terminated, if Bob has completed over 50% of the week's hours he will be paid $200 at the end of the week, otherwise he will be paid $100 at the end of the week. * If the contract is terminated Bob will get back his $1000 bond on the day the contract was terminated. * This contract will be reviewed every week if and when the payment has been made. Yes, at this stage it's a hypothetical/simple contract that doesn't address certain conditions/situations. But hopefully it gives you an idea of what I was thinking about. So, is this a stupid idea? A great idea? Any thoughts out there? Link to post Share on other sites
fluffy0 Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 Mary should just hire a male butler/ sex servant. Link to post Share on other sites
Author Numerouno Posted December 9, 2007 Author Share Posted December 9, 2007 Exactly, fluffy0, the concept above is simply a "sex butler" with additional conditions added to the deal. For example, if Mary wants to go to a party and needs a partner all she has to do is ask Bob to join her (whereas a stereotypical butler wouldn't be expected to go with Mary to the party.) So, if this can be done. Why isn't it more prevalent in society? The financial status of an individual certainly influences this situation. For example, there's a lot of "Mary's" out there who can't afford it, just as there are a lot of "Bob's" out there who have enough money so that they are not inclined to pursue this form of employment. But, there certainly are a lot of people in the world who can afford it and a lot of people who might consider taking up the position due to their poor financial status. So, to me, it appears that the social stigma of this concept is what is holding it back. Therefore (without considering one's financial status) what would stop a person from associating themselves with this type of contract? Link to post Share on other sites
Touche Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Exactly, fluffy0, the concept above is simply a "sex butler" with additional conditions added to the deal. For example, if Mary wants to go to a party and needs a partner all she has to do is ask Bob to join her (whereas a stereotypical butler wouldn't be expected to go with Mary to the party.) So, if this can be done. Why isn't it more prevalent in society? The financial status of an individual certainly influences this situation. For example, there's a lot of "Mary's" out there who can't afford it, just as there are a lot of "Bob's" out there who have enough money so that they are not inclined to pursue this form of employment. But, there certainly are a lot of people in the world who can afford it and a lot of people who might consider taking up the position due to their poor financial status. So, to me, it appears that the social stigma of this concept is what is holding it back. Therefore (without considering one's financial status) what would stop a person from associating themselves with this type of contract? Well for one thing, most people want to know that someone is with them because they want to be and not because they need to be. Most people want to be loved for who they are and not for what they can provide. Link to post Share on other sites
Author Numerouno Posted December 9, 2007 Author Share Posted December 9, 2007 Good point Touche, you've answered my question. Thank you. Link to post Share on other sites
Touche Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Good point Touche, you've answered my question. Thank you. You're very welcome. Do you agree though? It's ok if you don't. Link to post Share on other sites
Author Numerouno Posted December 9, 2007 Author Share Posted December 9, 2007 Yes, I agree. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts