SunniDayz Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 I can tell you I am in my late 20's and have perky 36 C's, all natural. Why would any female want fake breasts and why would a man want to touch/suck...with fake breasts. They are not real..laughs. What a fake society we have turned into. You have what God has given you. You either accept people for who they are or you don't. They are only breasts. By the way, my hair has never been colored nor my eyes. That is like if a guy had a fake longer/thicker penis. It is not him then. Link to post Share on other sites
Lizzie60 Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 I can tell you I am in my late 20's and have perky 36 C's, all natural. Why would any female want fake breasts and why would a man want to touch/suck...with fake breasts. They are not real..laughs. What a fake society we have turned into. You have what God has given you. You either accept people for who they are or you don't. They are only breasts. By the way, my hair has never been colored nor my eyes. That is like if a guy had a fake longer/thicker penis. It is not him then. Well. you are blessed to have nice boobs.. I am too.. but I know that if I had boobs that would make me miserable.. like the pancakes style or the pear shape.. I would probably do something about it.. but it would have to be extremely ugly boobs.. I don't mind cosmetic surgery if it makes a person happier... I do colour my hair, otherwise they would be all grey.. yuck... I had my teeth whitened professionally.. a bright white smile makes you look younger... Anything that make a person feel better could be a good thing for their self-esteem. Link to post Share on other sites
annieo Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 You can have impacted wisdom teeth that require extraction and some people need to be anesthesized for this. Infection can occur. The risk of heart problems as a result of dental work can be quite elevated in some people. And, as we've already discussed, there are greater risks in driving to work than there are in having a breast augmentation. I'd like to think that the concerns presented here are borne out of safety issues but that's not what I am "hearing." Rather, there seems to be a whole lot of moralizing going on. Not by all posters, but certainly by a great many of those who are opposed to breast augmentation. If the underlying issue is that society's compass is pointed in the wrong direction, and that "our" definition of sexuality is "wrong," surely there is a better way to get the point across and garner support than by berating women who choose breast augmentation. First of all, if you require tooth extraction for medical reasons, it's not an elective cosmetic procedure, so you don't have much choice. Ditto for driving to work. Unless not working is an option, or getting a job closer to home, what choice do you have. There is a difference between risks that you have to take, for health/employment reasons, and those that you take for reasons of vanity. I am not berating or judging anyone. I think it is entirely up to the individual to choose for themselves. But I don't think you can say that the risks for necessary actions/procedures are equivalent to taking risks for more frivolous pursuits. I am NOT veiling a judgement in concern, but I am entitled to my opinion. For me, despite my "woefully" tiny breasts, I would not do anything as risky as surgery to change my size. Now, if some nice, safe, non-invasive option became available (e.g., the tit fairy), I might go for it. But I am not a risk-taker by nature. But I have nothing, NOTHING against women who go the surgical route. It's their body, their life. Link to post Share on other sites
StartingOver07 Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 First of all, if you require tooth extraction for medical reasons, it's not an elective cosmetic procedure, so you don't have much choice. It was a choice to straighten my teeth, which necessitated having some extracted. I was healthy with crooked teeth; I just did not like my smile. There is a difference between risks that you have to take, for health/employment reasons, and those that you take for reasons of vanity. So if the OP's wife was taking up rock climbing or sky-diving, do you think there would be the same moralistic tones in this thread? Those activities are certainly risky. What if she opted to get a tattoo? I am not berating or judging anyone. I think it is entirely up to the individual to choose for themselves. But I don't think you can say that the risks for necessary actions/procedures are equivalent to taking risks for more frivolous pursuits But it is judgemental when people try to impose their notion of "frivolous risk" on someone else. Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 (edited) No doubt. And they will encounter painful moments from that. But they should learn that it doesn't matter what their peers think. Infact, that is HOW they learn that those things shouldn't matter. They might not get that when they are 14, but with maturity, as an adult, they will if their parents install those values into them. But what I see, are adults that still feel like that 14 year old kid living up to a standard that even the people presenting the image don't live up to. (haha, I should know because I got body issues. I however don't feel the desire for plastic surgery for it.) That's because most of the psychological scarring that happens to a human being is what they see/live in those years of chidlhood to their teens. Those are very impressionable years and yes you may grow to be a fine adult who can reason through things but any undealt with body issues that remain from when you were teased at 9 10 11 etc will remain with you until you deal with it as an adult. Well, I wasn't really laughing in real life but I am sure you know that. I never denied that certain attributes where praised over others for whatever reason. What I disagreed with your automatic assumption that every girl with big breasts was thought to be a peer's "superior" in my experience. You asked me so I responded. My automatic "assumption" was that women who developed earlier got the most attention in those years, it's sexuality kicking and no matter how you look at it it is a sexual response that comes from a place of instinct not a place of what the media or porn instills in people, it simply sexual response. At a young age boys and girls see what they like and respond to it, big breasts at age 11 is ONE example of it, being slim and outgoing, in otherwords "goodlooking" (that's what you were implying because outgoing and goodlooking go hand in hand at that age) is another example and kids respond to what they see in a positive or negitive fashion and they are driven by their hormones. I understand that was your experience and I did not argue with that. I however pointed out that my experience was different in the regards that in my school, while I am sure guys loved breasts, the size didn't determine a girl's popularity. Well you must have gone to the only school in the world were looks had nothing to do with popularity kids just took to really studious kids. My point was we were talking about how someone said MEN are to blame for women's pressure on the way they should look and how the media influences people to like certain things and my argument was that yes and no because children as early as in pubirty know what they find attractive and what they don't, hence my example that the girls with big breasts became instantly popular in grade school. But yes of course if there was a girl with big breasts that was chubby and a girl who was slim, pretty and breasts chances are the breasts alone would do NOTHING for them. But in comparisson to the skinny, not very attractive pimply flat chested girl the girl with titties prob bad a better chance at being accepted. The point is sexual response in what kids see and the shaping of what we find attractive VS what we don't. But now it's my turn to find irony with you. Where you were once positivly enforcing an unnatural process (breast implants) to make one feel better, you don't seem to hold the same opinion here in the unnatural process of working out and eating. It's quite interesting. You say: But you weren't asking any of those questions when it came to breast implants. You were very encouraging of it. Now, when we discuss the other exericizing and eating that can also be mechanically orchestrated, do you seem to find some just cause to question how healhty it really all is. Again, you missed my point. I don't question EITHER one, I am for any process that a person feels is right for them to improve their looks, their life, their self esteem. I brought up the working out/muscle example because people get so hung up on something like a boob implant beause it is "intrusive", it is "fake" it is "risky", well so it eating a weird diet that deprives you of essential nutrients and drinking crap in a shake to make your muscles bigger, so is pumping chemicals into your body to enhance muscle growth, and so is spending hours upon hours a day looking in the mirror at a gym doing things to your body with weights that are not in any way shape or form natural. A man had one of his arms explode because he built so much muscle. It's not natural yet this is the WAY of life people strive for now a days and a whole business has been built around it to the point where people zero their lives around this type of lifestyle, they allowed themselves to be brainwashed into believing this is the better way of life and they strive for this and there is no questions asked but someone says I wanna get a boob job and all the self esteem jabs come out, all the derrogatory comments come out to put the "type" of women that would do this down, all the low blows basically because women are threatened by other women who LOOK SEXUAL. That's the bottom line. I think the irony is still in someone as yourself who is SO opposed to one but does not question the other. That is why I brought it up. I don't look like a playboy bunny and never will. And even the playboy bunnies don't. But I don't know if guys understand that. Heck, I read a little thing about Jessica Alba that said that in her movie posters then enhance her bust. Can you believe that? She is beautiful as she is, but even on Jessica Alba someone feels the need to "fine tune." (again I use that term loosely). Yes I can believe that beauty/sex sells that has ALWAYS been the case, it IS the case and ALWAYS will be the case. It is not a new concept and it is not one that is ever going to change. Well, for one thing. People spend more time worried about the phyiscal then the other aspects you mentioned. The other thing is people don't accpet one another on the spiritural or intellectual fronts either. We don't all have the same spiritural beliefs but I am sure we all think ours is the right way. I totally agree, I have always been a fan of cutlivating BOTH. I believe in working out the body, but also the brain. Not everyone sees it like you or I. Well to be honest, I probably wouldn't have the same issue as getting your teeth fixed as I do with breast implants or nose surgery. I consider those two features more individual. But I also think breasts are something very personal to women. And to have men, society, even other women set a standard for breasts that can only be obtained by an illusion, I feel attacks alot of woman's natural femininism. That's just how I feel about it. We don't attack men's penis size to the extent we attack a woman's breast size. That is why people get so much more upset about it, it's like an attack on women. Well no of course you wouldn't one is non-sexual and therefore non-threatening. The sexual appearance of a woman seems to be. Any woman who is overtly sexual is threatening to other women. It's just the way it is. So is it really the guys that are the problem? I can tell you I am in my late 20's and have perky 36 C's, all natural. Why would any female want fake breasts You don't understand why a woman would want a boob job, because it seems you don't have the capacity to empathise with a woman who was born with a chessboard for a top. If you didn't have "perky 36 Cs all natural" (I find it interesting your choice of words to describe your own breasts since it comes across like you are flaunting) maybe you might change your tune slightly. Ya think? They are only breasts. Which, you HAVE. By the way, my hair has never been colored nor my eyes. I guess you don't wear makeup or deodorant, you don't shave/wax at all and you definitely don't pluck your eyebrows or anywhere else on your body. If you said "no" to all of these you are a true anomaly, for everyone else there is Mastercard! :laugh: I am not berating or judging anyone. I think it is entirely up to the individual to choose for themselves. But I don't think you can say that the risks for necessary actions/procedures are equivalent to taking risks for more frivolous pursuits. Heck listen some religions think organ transplants are frivolous pursuits, because when it is God's will to have a person go you must not stand in the way of that. But I won't dispute that there are operations we need and others that we choose to have for personal frivolous topical reasons. But the bottom line still is operations happen to improve our lives no matter what the operation my be, be it for health reasons or cosmetic we do them to better our existence. Edited February 18, 2008 by Tomcat33 Link to post Share on other sites
annieo Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Fine, I agree tomcat. If someone is miserable with their body and surgery helps them to hold their head up, then it's a good thing. Nobody should go through life feeling unattractive if they don't have to. I just question why it is that so many women feel this way. Are so many of us naturally ugly or deficient? Or have we been brainwashed by society, the media, and possibly friends, partners, etc.. to feel this way about ourselves? It's only a question: I don't have all the answers. Link to post Share on other sites
JerseyShortie Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Tomcat, alot of this going back and forth with you is getting pretty redundant. I have said my peace on alot of points and disagree with you on alot of things. I also think you do quite a bit of twisting points around and back-double talk. Obviously there are things humans are naturally attracted to, and there is nothing wrong with being attracted to big breasts or a big butt or small breasts or a small butt. I however think the unrealistic preasures that are placed on women to look a certain way are neither "natural" or "healthy". I stand by my statment that women and men are equally to blame for the pressures on women and the unrealistic expectations that are created in a male dominated media like porn, and the media itself. It's so weird to because it's like the ideal of what a woman is suppose to look like is some cartoonish character. If you don't think porn and the media and general doesn't influence people, then I think you are being unrealistic. Take something as non-sexual as advertising. Advertising works. People are influenced by it. And people are influnced by other mediums..such as porn. We are a product of an industry that wants us to be consumers. Buy new breasts, buy a new car, buy those new shoes...these make you "better" people after all and more attractive. I personally think it is bull-honkey. I wanna get a boob job and all the self esteem jabs come out, all the derrogatory comments come out to put the "type" of women that would do this down, all the low blows basically because women are threatened by other women who LOOK SEXUAL. That's the bottom line. I think the irony is still in someone as yourself who is SO opposed to one but does not question the other. That is why I brought it up. I never once made a jab or called a woman a name because she wanted breast implants. I did say that they are insecure. But that isn't a jab, it's the truth. And I really didn't notice any other people here calling women names either. What I did notice is alot of people who didn't agree with breast implants adding their two cents and you telling them they were putting a woman down. I have no issue with a woman wanting to look sexual. What I have an issue with is women are made to feel less because of unreal expectations set up by porn and the media. And I think it isn't fair of you to say someone is putting a woman down just because she/he disagrees with breast augmentation. Yes I can believe that beauty/sex sells that has ALWAYS been the case, it IS the case and ALWAYS will be the case. It is not a new concept and it is not one that is ever going to change. This was your comment to my Jessica Alba story. I find your response a touch weak here. Jessica Alba is already beautiful/sexy. She didn't need to be enhanced in any way. These "enhancements" create unreal expectations that make girls think they need breast implants to look like something even the image doesn't look like. That isn't only selling sex, that is selling misconceptions. Which, you HAVE. You made this comment to the woman that said she had perky c's and said "they are only breasts". She does have breasts. As do I. As do all woman by definitions of being a woman. You seem to have this idea that just because a woman is a certain size, she must not have breasts. Maybe that is your own judgement talking there. And that seems belitting to me and other women with small breasts if you ask me. That a woman can only have breasts if they are big. Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) I stand by my statment that women and men are equally to blame for the pressures on women and the unrealistic expectations that are created in a male dominated media like porn, and the media itself. It's so weird to because it's like the ideal of what a woman is suppose to look like is some cartoonish character. Gees you really underestimate men in general I really don't think men EXPECT women to look like porn dolls, but women think they do. A lot of men are very capable of seperating reality from people who are hand picked to star in movies, television, magazine ads etc. to sell sex. If you let yourself be influenced that it is your downfall, take responsibilty for it and stop blaming men for that. And I say "you" as in the "general you" I never once made a jab or called a woman a name because she wanted breast implants. I did say that they are insecure. But that isn't a jab, it's the truth. And I really didn't notice any other people here calling women names either. What I did notice is alot of people who didn't agree with breast implants adding their two cents and you telling them they were putting a woman down. I have no issue with a woman wanting to look sexual. What I have an issue with is women are made to feel less because of unreal expectations set up by porn and the media. And I think it isn't fair of you to say someone is putting a woman down just because she/he disagrees with breast augmentation. Well last I checked you are not the only person commenting on this thread are you? You made this comment to the woman that said she had perky c's and said "they are only breasts". She does have breasts. As do I. As do all woman by definitions of being a woman. . Are you kidding NOT all women have perky C cup breasts, not by a long shot. My comment to her was because she just "didn't get why any woman would want a breast implant" well easy for her to say she has fair sized "perky" perfect breasts. Maybe if she had flat droopy unattractive non-breasts she WOULD understand why some other women want to change that. You seem to have this idea that just because a woman is a certain size, she must not have breasts. Maybe that is your own judgement talking there. And that seems belitting to me and other women with small breasts if you ask me. That a woman can only have breasts if they are big Now that's just your own insecurity talking, I never once said any particular size was good or bad, I simply said I support those who are unhappy to want a change. I am speaking English aren't I? Did I say anywhere that a woman only has breasts if they are big? Edited February 19, 2008 by Tomcat33 Link to post Share on other sites
annieo Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Quite right, tomcat, in your above post, you have stated that a woman has "non-breasts" when they are "flat, droopy or unattractive". Quite definitely understandable and in English. Nothing to do with size. But just be aware of the fact that the only woman who is woman-bashing on this post is, evidently, you. Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) Quite right, tomcat, in your above post, you have stated that a woman has "non-breasts" when they are "flat, droopy or unattractive". Quite definitely understandable and in English. Nothing to do with size. But just be aware of the fact that the only woman who is woman-bashing on this post is, evidently, you. Oh no flat non-existent droopy breasts are definitely breasts, just not desirable ones. Just like obese disproportionate thighs are not desirable, droopy flat bums are not desirable and neither is excessive facial hair for women, all pretty common things that I think people would agree are not only undesirable they are just not very attractive to look at. Can someone grow to love these inadequacies about themsleves SURE they can, but would others also want to change this about them because it is unpleasing to look at, again... SURE. That's what beauty is it is in the eye of the beholder. Some women have perfectly good looking breasts but to them they might as well have droopy non-existent boobies so perception, just like body parts, come in all shapes form and sizes. And I really don't see how my making that comment is bashing women in any way, it is just calling out a reality of what people see and strive to change about themselves. Look I gave my points on what I think, I don't know why you keep insisiting on trying to get more out of me, my idea is not going to change and my idea is in case you've missed it: people have every right to change something they don't like about themselves and make it into whatever they want because that is why we OWN our own bodies. You can accept that or you cannot, the fact of the matter is people are going to change things about themselves regardless of what anyone thinks. Edited February 19, 2008 by Tomcat33 Link to post Share on other sites
annieo Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 You called them "non-breasts" not me. Stand by what you say, or no one will take you seriously. Anyway, enough already. I've got this feeling that if I suddenly stated that breast implants were great and that all women with "unattractive" breasts should get them, you'd turn around and try to tell me I was wrong. You are a classic contrarion. Your location, "opposite of where you are", says it all. Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) You called them "non-breasts" not me. Stand by what you say, or no one will take you seriously. Anyway, enough already. I've got this feeling that if I suddenly stated that breast implants were great and that all women with "unattractive" breasts should get them, you'd turn around and try to tell me I was wrong. You are a classic contrarion. Your location, "opposite of where you are", says it all. Can I sit by what I say instead? I'd rather sit. Ok well on that note I'm going to go lose some sleep over your dismissal of me... form one classic contrarion to a classic jejune lady- tah-tah! not to be confused with "ta-tas" Edited February 19, 2008 by Tomcat33 Link to post Share on other sites
ladyintights Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 No it does not, ask any man who is playing with fake boobs and listen to him complain....NOT! :laugh: I'm sorry, but I've heard MANY men complain about their wives' and gf's fake breasts saying exactly what I posted: looks good.. feels good=no. Link to post Share on other sites
ladyintights Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) How did you come up with that ridiculous statement about African tribal men...whhhhaaaaaaa? I seriously don't get your analogy. What suggests that I think African tribal men have no use of reasons? they managed to subsist as a society for hundreds of years on the bare mininum survival tactics, moreson than anyone else on the planet...talk about powerful use of reason!!! And I may add they love big boobs too, it's instinctual. What I said was that people have desired big boobs since man had the use of reason, in other words: forever. Porn on no porn of the 21st century. So it is no wonder the OP's wife would like to have them done and she should if this will make her feel better about herself. A man can't understand this from a psychological level and may confuse this with her wanting more sexual attention but it isn't necessarily like that. It would be comperable to being born with flat testicles, sure you can still have a normal life without them but it makes you feel less of a man having almost non existent testies. Wow.. I didn't know your level of comprehension was this below par. What you are stating is IN FACT a FALSE statement. African tribal men "love big boobs too"?? LOL! You seem to be a little less educated than most. It's common knowledge that many societies in the world do not view breasts as a sexual object, nor are the stimulated by them by the sense of sight or touch. It's purely a reflection of the world we live in and our conditioning based on media etc. I sense that you had a breast job, huh? You are thinking with your emotions, and not intelligently. Edited February 19, 2008 by ladyintights Link to post Share on other sites
ladyintights Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) Oh no flat non-existent droopy breasts are definitely breasts, just not desirable ones. Just like obese disproportionate thighs are not desirable, droopy flat bums are not desirable and neither is excessive facial hair for women, all pretty common things that I think people would agree are not only undesirable they are just not very attractive to look at. Can someone grow to love these inadequacies about themsleves SURE they can, but would others also want to change this about them because it is unpleasing to look at, again... SURE. That's what beauty is it is in the eye of the beholder. Some women have perfectly good looking breasts but to them they might as well have droopy non-existent boobies so perception, just like body parts, come in all shapes form and sizes. And I really don't see how my making that comment is bashing women in any way, it is just calling out a reality of what people see and strive to change about themselves. Look I gave my points on what I think, I don't know why you keep insisiting on trying to get more out of me, my idea is not going to change and my idea is in case you've missed it: people have every right to change something they don't like about themselves and make it into whatever they want because that is why we OWN our own bodies. You can accept that or you cannot, the fact of the matter is people are going to change things about themselves regardless of what anyone thinks. wrong.. There are many tribes in the world that view FLAT, SAGGING breasts as beautiful. You really need to go out into the world more often and have some diverse experiences. Yep, it's called "reality" hun... maybe you can join us there. WOW.. since I last responded, there are pages and pages of posts with you yelling at people and trying to make an argument to negate another's "OPINION". LOL! You really are obsessed with your fake tatas, aren't you? I really don't think I can change a woman's opinion who already has a big fake sack of silicone in her chest.. why do you care?? Oh.. other peoples' opinions of you, you value highly... I think we already proved the point that "people who get chest implants have self-esteem issues".. there are about 6 pages of your bs proving that. Edited February 19, 2008 by ladyintights Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 wrong.. There are many tribes in the world that view FLAT, SAGGING breasts as beautiful. You really need to go out into the world more often and have some diverse experiences. Yep, it's called "reality" hun... maybe you can join us there. Well "hun" in my reality, in the western world that is, in the place where we are entertaining this discussion we don't walk around topless with paint all over our bodies and stretched earlobes and breasts hanging down to our waists nor is that the ideal of what beauty is. Not sure what part of the world you live in but that is certainly not my reality, so not sure what reality you want me to step into?? Furthermore, I have not stopped to ponder what tribal men in Arica find attractive and I don't doubt for a second that different sectors of the globe have different ideals on beauty. But here in OUR world/culture I highly doubt that the last car ad I saw that used a buxom bikini babe to sell it, was geared towards tribal men of Africa and THEIR ideal of beauty.. :lmao: Link to post Share on other sites
ladyintights Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Well "hun" in my reality, in the western world that is, in the place where we are entertaining this discussion we don't walk around topless with paint all over our bodies and stretched earlobes and breasts hanging down to our waists nor is that the ideal of what beauty is. Not sure what part of the world you live in but that is certainly not my reality, so not sure what reality you want me to step into?? Furthermore, I have not stopped to ponder what tribal men in Arica find attractive and I don't doubt for a second that different sectors of the globe have different ideals on beauty. But here in OUR world/culture I highly doubt that the last car ad I saw that used a buxom bikini babe to sell it, was geared towards tribal men of Africa and THEIR ideal of beauty.. :lmao: You just said that tribal men love "big breasts"... LMFAO! Anyways, I was debating your stance that "men have been attracted to big breasts since the dawn of man".. and since they have had the use of "reason".. So tribal men don't have use of their "reason"?? LOL Maybe you should think a little before you form a cheap opinion trying to pass it off as "fact". Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 I'm sorry, but I've heard MANY men complain about their wives' and gf's fake breasts saying exactly what I posted: looks good.. feels good=no. Men tell you that because they sense your insecurity/rage on this topic and try to make you feel better about yourself/stance. Link to post Share on other sites
ladyintights Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Men tell you that because they sense your insecurity/rage on this topic and try to make you feel better about yourself/stance. HAHA! I didn't bring up breasts my dear (never did actually- it's not a big issue for me to bring up), they did.. they were complaining after their wives have gotten it. BTW, I have large NATURAL breasts.. so exactly what type of "insecurity/rage" issues are you babbling about? :lmao::lmao: Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Anyways, I was debating your stance that "men have been attracted to big breasts since the dawn of man".. and since they have had the use of "reason".. So tribal men don't have use of their "reason"?? LOL Man HAS been attracted to ample bossoms since the use of reason. Ok well read on and when you learn something along the way and we can try this again. Class dismissed Link to post Share on other sites
ladyintights Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) Man HAS been attracted to ample bossoms since the use of reason. Ok well read on and when you learn something along the way and we can try this again. Class dismissed So therefore African tribal men or anyone who isn't attracted to "ample bussoms" have no use of reason??? LOL!LOL!!!!!!! Oh, but this is coming from the same women who said all men are attracted to big breasts and apparently has no education on human history and social studies-past or current! LOL! The sexual attraction with breasts is a rather more recent phenomenon than you think. If you look to ancient art etc, RARELY was a woman's chest covered.. because they didn't see the breasts as sexually objectifying. If men lie to anyone, it's usually their poor wives and gfs... seriously though. But seriously, nice breasts come in all sizes and shapes.. it's in the eye of the beholder.. I'm just sharing my knowledge on how some men view sacks of silicone. "LOOK GREAT.. don't feel so great."... It probably depends on how much skin or breast the woman had originally before they put the implant in OR simply how big the implant is. Implant/Breast tissue ratio.. Edited February 19, 2008 by ladyintights Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) So therefore African tribal men or anyone who isn't attracted to "ample bussoms" have no use of reason??? LOL!LOL!!!!!!! Oh, but this is coming from the same women who said all men are attracted to big breasts and apparently has no education on human history and social studies-past or current! LOL! The sexual attraction with breasts is a rather more recent phenomenon than you think. If you look to ancient art etc, RARELY was a woman's chest covered.. because they didn't see the breasts as sexually objectifying. . Here you go read: http://www.livescience.com/history/060214_cave_art.html http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/religion/blgrk_artemis10.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast sexual role, cultural status,in practice http://www.fjkluth.com/amaz.html also read up on Artemis and other greek goddesses http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl/9780345388940.html http://www.freeessays.cc/db/27/hec56.shtml Once you read come back and I might entertain continuing this discussion with you. Until then, I'm of the idea that a person must have minimal education on a topic before they go ahead and make claims that are simply going to be discredited due to their highly infactual content. You can make up an opinion, fine anyone can make anything up, but don't pass it off as fact please. Feel free to post material to substantiate your stance. Edited February 19, 2008 by Tomcat33 Link to post Share on other sites
StartingOver07 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 I think lots of guys tell women what they want to hear. How's that for a profound statement! lol Here's a test you can take to see how good your powers of observation are: http://www.controlledmedia.com/pages/breastaugmentation.htm (scroll down a bit; the stuff at the top is deceiving). Link to post Share on other sites
BentSpine Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 I did get 73 % accurate and I think fake boobs are a huge turn off as soon as I realise they are fake. I admit a woman with fake boobs is still a human and can probably become a good partner for a guy that sports a shaved head, wears multiple visible tattoos (with at least one skeleton in each), owns a big dog (whose shyt has never hit the rubbish bin), who tries to compensate a lack of musical training with big amplifier + loudspeakers, and finally considers the value of a car is proportional to its maximum speed. Link to post Share on other sites
Tomcat33 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I think lots of guys tell women what they want to hear. How's that for a profound statement! lol Here's a test you can take to see how good your powers of observation are: http://www.controlledmedia.com/pages/breastaugmentation.htm (scroll down a bit; the stuff at the top is deceiving). Ahaha I'm aaaaall for lightening up. Fun quiz, thanks!! I got 77%. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts