Adunaphel Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 I was reading movingonandon's interesting thread, and it reminded me of a situation I heard about (and the thought of which keeps bugging me). Let's assume a W, or H, is one of those person who find it extremely difficult to say no to everyone - almost to a pathological level - and are unable to stand their ground. If she (or he) had sex, or had inappropriate physical contact, with someone who exerts power/influence over her (or him) (this someone could be the employeer, or a distant relative/family friend, or someone who helped out his her/his family, or a combination of the above), would you consider it infidelity, or would consider it just plain abuse? Link to post Share on other sites
Owl Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 If she was DIAGNOSED with some type of disorder that demonstrated her impaired judgement and inability to make rational disorders...its ABUSE. If she's not had any kind of help or diagnosis, and we're just guessing at some kind of mental disorder...its impossible to tell. If she's clearly capable of rational thought and knew what the consequences of sleeping with this guy was...its infidelity. Link to post Share on other sites
Amiss Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 I would wonder why they were in a relationship if they had unresolved sexual issues. Fidelity is very important to meso I would avoid a relationship with a sex addict Link to post Share on other sites
Author Adunaphel Posted August 4, 2008 Author Share Posted August 4, 2008 Thank you for both of your replies. I just realized I did not express myself well when I said that the person is unable to say no - I meant that she is unable to say no to people in most aspects of her life, the kind of person who might be unable to to disengage from an uninteresting conversation with a neighbour even if her house were on fire, because the neighbour might get offended. (The exemple is extreme). So if she "cheated" it is probably that she did not want to, and very possible that he did not even find the man attractive. Link to post Share on other sites
bish Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 It is infidelity and cheating no matter how you slice it. Link to post Share on other sites
Zofia Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 Infidelity. The kind of people who find it impossible to say no, without actually having some sort of pathological disorder that impairs their mental functions in a way they absolutely cannot control, are just lying to them selves. They CAN disengage, they CAN say no, but they choose not to for whatever personal reasons, then lie to themselves that they can't help it. Lots of people cheat without consciously "meaning to", for many different reasons. Whether because they were too drunk, or because they're sex addicts, or because they're too impulsive, or whatever. Doesn't mean it's not cheating. They're still responsible for their decisions, even if that decision is portrayed as a lack of being able to make a decision to say no. Link to post Share on other sites
Riley Freeman Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 I was reading movingonandon's interesting thread, and it reminded me of a situation I heard about (and the thought of which keeps bugging me). Let's assume a W, or H, is one of those person who find it extremely difficult to say no to everyone - almost to a pathological level - and are unable to stand their ground. If she (or he) had sex, or had inappropriate physical contact, with someone who exerts power/influence over her (or him) (this someone could be the employeer, or a distant relative/family friend, or someone who helped out his her/his family, or a combination of the above), would you consider it infidelity, or would consider it just plain abuse? its not cheating, its rape Link to post Share on other sites
grogster Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 It's infidelity so long that the Affair Participant (AP) knows the difference between right and wrong and understands the nature of his or her actions: having sex with another person outside of the AP's marriage. While a diminished capacity might be a mitigating factor, it's still an Affair. If there's coercion or duress--sleep with me or I murder your husband or harm your children--that's not infidelity (because there's no intent). If there's simply a power imbalance but the AP is mentally competent, it's infidelity. Link to post Share on other sites
Author Adunaphel Posted August 4, 2008 Author Share Posted August 4, 2008 Thank you, again, for your thoughts. I guess that if I were in the person's significant other's shoes, I'd feel torn apart. I am quite sure I would consider my partner as a victim of abuse, and I would like to help, but at the same time I'd have the feeling of having being cheated on, be it irrational or not. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts