Author Isolde Posted February 16, 2009 Author Posted February 16, 2009 Tom Cruise is not my idea of extreme masculinity. He's the controlling overly possessive type, which I associate with weakness which I associate with femininity (sexist as that is). Strength is someone who is controlled, confident and doesn't need to control another person. I like that subtle distinction! As long as you don't start equating strength with emotional Unavailability again, I agree. When I said Tom was overly masculine, for my tastes I meant looks only. movingon, I bet you're cuter than Tom.
Island Girl Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Tom Cruise the Dwarf is overly masculine? Teenie Tiny Midget Men are never very masculine in my book.
Trialbyfire Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Tom Cruise, overly masculine looking? More like pretty boy!
lord alfred douglas Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Tom Cruise is not my idea of extreme masculinity. He's the controlling overly possessive type, which I associate with weakness which I associate with femininity (sexist as that is). Strength is someone who is controlled, confident and doesn't need to control another person. youre a pretty wise girl despite the bpd or whatever
shadowplay Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Tom Cruise, overly masculine looking? More like pretty boy! Yes, he's tiny, and his face has no "force."
Author Isolde Posted February 16, 2009 Author Posted February 16, 2009 Tom Cruise is overly masculine looking and yet overly pretty boy. I just can't stand him.
shadowplay Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 I just can't stand him. I think we can all agree on that.
chrislovestosurf Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 but i bet tom cruise could charm any single woman on here to drop her undies if he really wanted to.
Trialbyfire Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 but i bet tom cruise could charm any single woman on here to drop her undies if he really wanted to. Guaranteed he couldn't...now. Pre-nutbar phase aka Top Gun phase, he seemed pretty normal and approachable.
lord alfred douglas Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Why is everyone so hard on old Tom these days? I heard he was mad as a hatter, but I dont know why that's the common perception. Is it is his strange religion Santeria?
chrislovestosurf Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Guaranteed he couldn't...now. Pre-nutbar phase aka Top Gun phase, he seemed pretty normal and approachable. Yea he may be a little old to be attractive to the 20 somethings
Author Isolde Posted February 16, 2009 Author Posted February 16, 2009 I thought about it, and I somewhat agree with Shadow that my perspective may have influenced this thread. I think it's safe to say that I look for a certain force or gravitas or pathos in someone's facial expressions, and that coupled with handsomeness is what gets me going, and that is really rare. I still abide by my original point that attractive women are more common than attractive men, though.
Trialbyfire Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Yea he may be a little old to be attractive to the 20 somethingsMethinks it's less his age and more his psychosis...
lord alfred douglas Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 I thought about it, and I somewhat agree with Shadow that my perspective may have influenced this thread. I think it's safe to say that I look for a certain force or gravitas or pathos in someone's facial expressions, and that coupled with handsomeness is what gets me going, and that is really rare. I still abide by my original point that attractive women are more common than attractive men, though. well its easier for you guys to hide behind your make up and your hair, innit?
carhill Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Oh, come on! What female who still has a working vagina (or mouth) would pass up a hottie movie star mega rich tabloid king? Please! Stop it! I'm spitting on the cat
kashmir Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 I thought about it, and I somewhat agree with Shadow that my perspective may have influenced this thread. I think it's safe to say that I look for a certain force or gravitas or pathos in someone's facial expressions, and that coupled with handsomeness is what gets me going, and that is really rare. I still abide by my original point that attractive women are more common than attractive men, though. I think that's because the standards for a woman to be attractive are much lower than the standards for a man. A man can go out and probably find one out of every 3 women he sees attractive (depending where he is). Women are much more picky. Just look at that thread a few days ago about the things women find physically attractive in men and what is a "must." Very rarely do guys meet that criteria.
Tomcat33 Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Is it is his strange religion Santeria? I wish he was a member of a Santeria group, at least then he would be interesting. Try Illuminati.
lord alfred douglas Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 I wish he was a member of a Santeria group, at least then he would be interesting. Try Illuminati. My mother had an aunt that was into that stuff, although my mother and the rest of the family is in denial
Author Isolde Posted February 16, 2009 Author Posted February 16, 2009 I think that's because the standards for a woman to be attractive are much lower than the standards for a man. A man can go out and probably find one out of every 3 women he sees attractive (depending where he is). Women are much more picky. Just look at that thread a few days ago about the things women find physically attractive in men and what is a "must." Very rarely do guys meet that criteria. I do think women tend to look for a guy that stimulates their imagination--something intangible, even if it's just an illusion of depth. Guys don't seem to look for that in women as much, because they're more sexually driven. You may be right.
Trialbyfire Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 I wish he was a member of a Santeria group, at least then he would be interesting. Try Illuminati. You actually have to have real power and influence, before being allowed into the ranks of the illuminati!
shadowplay Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 I think it's safe to say that I look for a certain force or gravitas or pathos in someone's facial expressions, and that coupled with handsomeness is what gets me going, and that is really rare. . True, I think many women look for this. Their definition of attractiveness tends to be more subjective and impressionistic, intertwining looks and personality. Men view looks in a more simplistic, objective sense. While each guy may have a different ideal woman, he'll find a girl acceptable if she's considered hot by society's standards. Blandness or lack there of isn't a factor.
Storyrider Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Methinks it's less his age and more his psychosis... Mostly, he's too short.
Trialbyfire Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Mostly, he's too short. Do you think his vertically challenged affliction, has afflicted his ability to think like a rational being?
Author Isolde Posted February 16, 2009 Author Posted February 16, 2009 True, I think many women look for this. Their definition of attractiveness tends to be more subjective and impressionistic, intertwining looks and personality. Men view looks in a more simplistic, objective sense. While each guy may have a different ideal woman, he'll find a girl acceptable if she's considered hot by society's standards. Blandness or lack there of isn't a factor. Yeah, I think if a girl has a "deep", seductive, alluring thing going on, that's seen more as icing on the cake for a man.
Recommended Posts