All This Talk About Women Aging....

[Taramere]

I think that everybody should be euthanased by law at the age of 65. This will remove the gross problems associated with getting old and it will also force people to live more meaningful lives, including as far as relationships are concerned.

(I'm darn serious )

 

 

Dear oh dear. I think it's time for a song to cheer everyone up.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc9Scwb6v9U

[Trialbyfire]

To be fair to Jersey Shortie, women on this board continuously hear time and again, that when women age, they are worthless. This is a reactionary thread, one I don't blame her for.

 

Having said that, all this garbage about what age makes for the best children, seems not to focus on the most important details. IMO, the best children are the happiest children so people should focus on this aspect, rather than attempt to create superchildren, whether through nature and nurture.

[clv0116]

Here we go..... are you a member of the BNP perchance?

 

What's a BNP?

 

 

On Topic:

 

If a man just stores some soldiers away before he gets his vasectomy, he not only never has to worry about paternity fraud, unwanted kids, and so on, but he also dodges this bullet, if it exists.

 

Word to the wise boys.

[pollywag]

I think that everybody should be euthanased by law at the age of 65. This will remove the gross problems associated with getting old and it will also force people to live more meaningful lives, including as far as relationships are concerned.

(I'm darn serious )

 

 

The word is euthanized. Might as well learn how to use it correctly if you are going to use it...

 

You must not have a mother/father, or you must hate your mother/father if you seriously adhere to that school of thought. What will you do when your mother/father turns 65 and they are still in good shape both in mind and body?

[clv0116]

.... people should focus on this aspect, rather than attempt to create superchildren, whether through nature and nurture.

 

Poppycock! I want my genetically enhanced super babies!

[sb129]

BNP= British National Party. Google it.

 

When my parents are 65 (and sadly from the looks of it my Dad may not make it to that age because of the cancer he is suffering from) my child will be 9.

 

I am 31 and still have a grandmother who is alive at the age of 91. She has been an awesome influence on me, and I am really glad she made it well past my 9th birthday.

 

I see where JS is coming from re: "women aging", we are made to feel by many sectors that older women are not worth as much as younger ones. I for one, refuse to buy into that bollocks. I am enjoying life more as I get older and I hope it stays that way.

[Trimmer]

To be fair to Jersey Shortie, women on this board continuously hear time and again, that when women age, they are worthless. This is a reactionary thread, one I don't blame her for.

You know, I see it, but I don't engage in it because I don't believe it. I also see posters claiming that all men will cheat, and that men don't much respect or care for women beyond her spreading her legs, or that seeing a man out with his family immediately brings images of him going home and watching porn and disrespecting that family, etc...

 

So like a gang war, do we justify continually firing back 'reactionary' threads? This is actually an interesting article - my own reaction here was to the "God gets the last laugh" comment. I don't give a damn about members of either gender that throw blanket characterizations over the other gender - I try to ignore them both. But take a shot at children and I'll step up.

[clv0116]

BNP= British National Party. Google it.

 

When my parents are 65 (and sadly from the looks of it my Dad may not make it to that age because of the cancer he is suffering from) my child will be 9.

 

I am 31 and still have a grandmother who is alive at the age of 91. She has been an awesome influence on me, and I am really glad she made it well past my 9th birthday.

 

I see where JS is coming from re: "women aging", we are made to feel by many sectors that older women are not worth as much as younger ones. I for one, refuse to buy into that bollocks. I am enjoying life more as I get older and I hope it stays that way.

 

 

I live in America and I'm not very political, so I don't know what a BNP is, but as it turns out, being American, I guess I'm not one.

 

 

I don't think women are 'not worth as much' whatever that means. I guess if we were selling them off as slaves it might mean something, and in that case it would be interesting what the market would say. Probably all else different a younger prettier woman would command a higher price. But that's neither here nor there.

 

I and quite a few other single men prefer to court younger women. It doesn't mean younger women are 'worth less', it's just a preference. Now on the other hand a lot of guys like to date older women, sometimes even prefer them. I did at one time, simply because older women were easier to get and less likely to cause drama.

 

So it's all good, there's someone for everyone I guess.

[Trialbyfire]

You know, I see it, but I don't engage in it because I don't believe it. I also see posters claiming that all men will cheat, and that men don't much respect or care for women beyond her spreading her legs, or that seeing a man out with his family immediately brings images of him going home and watching porn and disrespecting that family, etc...

 

So like a gang war, do we justify continually firing back 'reactionary' threads? This is actually an interesting article - my own reaction here was to the "God gets the last laugh" comment. I don't give a damn about members of either gender that throw blanket characterizations over the other gender - I try to ignore them both. But take a shot at children and I'll step up.

But that's just it Trimmer. You're only seeing this one thread and reacting to it. I've seen time and again the sheer number of threads about how useless women are for the purposes of progeny, after they hit a certain age, how children born of any kind of union to women in their thirties and older, will have all kinds of problems. I'd like to see you react to those threads too.

[clv0116]

I've seen time and again the sheer number of threads about how useless women are for the purposes of progeny, after they hit a certain age, how children born of any kind of union to women in their thirties and older, will have all kinds of problems. I'd like to see you react to those threads too.

 

It's not just that. From a pragmatic standpoint I've seen what a womans body looks like after having children at 22, and after having children at 32. The younger woman recovers a lot better.

[boxing123]

But that's just it Trimmer. You're only seeing this one thread and reacting to it. I've seen time and again the sheer number of threads about how useless women are for the purposes of progeny, after they hit a certain age, how children born of any kind of union to women in their thirties and older, will have all kinds of problems. I'd like to see you react to those threads too.

 

 

I have yet to read any thread that stated that specifically.

 

I have read many threads in which younger men state they do not want to settle down with older women, or in which men stated they can procreate at a later age, etc..

[clv0116]

I have read many threads in which younger men state they do not want to settle down with older women, or in which men stated they can procreate at a later age, etc..

 

There are many aspects to my preference for courting younger women, but the key in this aspect and many others is simply that MY AGE is not a variable I can control. Other variables I can influence, so I spend time on those.

[Taramere]

But that's just it Trimmer. You're only seeing this one thread and reacting to it. I've seen time and again the sheer number of threads about how useless women are for the purposes of progeny, after they hit a certain age, how children born of any kind of union to women in their thirties and older, will have all kinds of problems. I'd like to see you react to those threads too.

 

Not only that, but most of us are well aware that a lot of guys dot between here and another site. I'm not decrying every guy who does that by any means, but there are one or two who express downright dodgy views....and you have to wonder what motivates them to post here.

 

Example. This thread. You can see that some guys take a "WTF, you're a loser" approach to the threadstarter, but the majority are going along the "way to go mate"!" route.

 

Now bear in mind that that's a site that purports to advise and cater to "AFCs" who are totally inexperienced with/clueless about women. What message do you think a thread like that give guys like that? Try to put yourself in a woman's shoes as you read through that thread.

 

Or imagine that it was started by a guy who's courting your little sister/daughter and presenting himself as a "quality man" in search of a "quality woman". Would you think "well, so he treated that woman like a slut...but my girl is a really decent girl. I'm sure he'll be fine to her, and he sounds like just the kind of man a quality girl like her deserves."?

 

Or would you start to wonder if there are any men out there who aren't either misogynists, hypocrites or uncomfortable bystanders who don't think it's quite cricket - but don't want to make a big deal of it.

 

There aren't many men like that, Trimmer. Even the decent guys generally seem to be too scared of "Captain save-a-ho" or "Mangina" labels to say anything against that kind of thing. Doesn't mean women here have to follow suit and say nothing about when we're getting crap thrown at us.

[Cherished]

Hey Jersey, don't worry about what some posters on a board post. I'm in my 30's and I know I'm beautiful and desirable. I work with and spend time with wonderful men who do not have these psycho attitudes about women and aging. They are not spending time on the internet propogating these laughable assertions. They are real men with real lives, not sad ones like the ones who post these types of posts.

Just don't worry about the psychotic anti-women posts. The posters who post the negative aging and women threads have issues and be thankful that they are not a part of your life!

[mr.dream merchant]

Hey Jersey, don't worry about what some posters on a board post. I'm in my 30's and I know I'm beautiful and desirable. I work with and spend time with wonderful men who do not have these psycho attitudes about women and aging. They are not spending time on the internet propogating these laughable assertions. They are real men with real lives, not sad ones like the ones who post these types of posts.

Just don't worry about the psychotic anti-women posts. The posters who post the negative aging and women threads have issues and be thankful that they are not a part of your life!

 

I guess the same words of advice can be given to men attacked by JerseyShortie. She's miserable guys, take none of her words to heart.

[Cherished]

No, it is difficult to start reading those posts, though. She was simply reacting to tons of recent posts degrading women. These types of men run for the hills when presented with a woman with a healthy self-esteem and hide behind their computer.

Her post was simply reactionary to the huge number of posts degrading women and aging.

[clv0116]

Not only that, but most of us are well aware that a lot of guys dot between here and another site. I'm not decrying every guy who does that by any means, but there are one or two who express downright dodgy views....and you have to wonder what motivates them to post here.

 

Example. This thread.

 

That's just sad.

 

 

This part was particularly disturbing:

 

The whole drive to her place I keep telling myself that this was a dirty hor that I picked up on the street and paid her 20 bucks to be my slave for the night. She was no longer on a pedestal; menatally I had placed her in the gutter where she belonged.

 

Why would anyone want to be with someone from the gutter? WTH?

[sb129]

I'm 32, married AND pregnant. I am doooooooomed to be relegated to un-hot haggard- ness forevermore

[clv0116]

I guess the same words of advice can be given to men attacked by JerseyShortie. She's miserable guys, take none of her words to heart.

 

I can tell she's so angry at something that she's actually vicious. Only sees or reads what she wants to see. If you disagree with her, you're not merely a little bit on the other side, you're automatically an extreme misogynist whose mind she knows better than you do. Fun times.

[sb129]

sorry, 31 31. I will be 32 when I have the baby. Still doomed.

[Trialbyfire]

Taramere, if you consider how self-prophesy works, guys who are clueless attempt to emulate the AFC mannerisms, then fail, then get progressively bitter each time they try. They go back for more horrible advice from AFC sites, then continue failing worse and worse. It really is the blind leading the blind.

 

Now we're seeing more and more of this garbage on LS. I can see this site turning into another sausagefest of useless information, instead of the more balanced advice site it used to be.

[Taramere]

That's just sad.

 

 

This part was particularly disturbing:

 

 

 

Why would anyone want to be with someone from the gutter? WTH?

 

I don't always agree with you by any means, clv - but I do appreciate that commentary you just gave. I found it sad and disturbing too.

[Cherished]

Why are men getting so worked up anyway over this thread? All she did was post an article. Then she stated that it is ultimately up to God to decide.

Why would this set men off?

It is in no way degrading men.

It is simply a scientific study which states that younger sperm creates more intelligent babies.

This is different than the threads which blindly state that career women sleep with career men and it's a f**kfest in the breakroom everyday, and the one which is completely subjective when it states that women age earlier than men and men are more attractive in their later years than women in their later years. Nothing to back that up, and it can be easily debunked.

It is simply saying to men that if you want to have more intelligent children, don't wait until your later years.

I don't get why this is offensive and there is reason to bash the OP for this.

[Taramere]

Taramere, if you consider how self-prophesy works, guys who are clueless attempt to emulate the AFC mannerisms, then fail, then get progressively bitter each time they try. They go back for more horrible advice from AFC sites, then continue failing worse and worse. It really is the blind leading the blind.

 

Now we're seeing more and more of this garbage on LS. I can see this site turning into another sausagefest of useless information, instead of the more balanced advice site it used to be.

 

My feeling about both sites is that the majority of users are probably pretty sound people, TBF. But that kind of vitriol I linked just tends to be more eyecatching I suppose.

[clv0116]

I don't get why this is offensive and there is reason to bash the OP for this.

 

Who's bashing?