clatan Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 Being totally honest, I'd like to get the opinions of women. Does a guy that doesn't make a lot of money have a chance with you? My question is a little complex so I'll elaborate... I'm not talking about Donald Trump or any man that's rich per se. I also am not talking about a total bum or a guy who flips burgers at McDonalds that has no educational or career goals other than flipping burgers for life. I'm talking about a nice looking, independent, nice guy that works a respectable job but and is otherwise a great catch but only takes home say around $250 a week. This guy doesn't make a lot of money at the moment nor does he have the appearance of making a lot of money, ie he doesn't drive a new SUV or wear Tommy Hilfiger so he'll look successful, possibly spending his money frivilously or even above his means. I'm also not talking about a guy who is for the moment dirt poor, but presently earning his law degree or in line to inherit a successful family business. I guess I could use myself as an example. I'm thirty-three. I have about a year and a half of college. I have plenty of academic interests including history, religion, and politics. Plenty of hobbies like sketching, web design, painting, travel, fishing and martial arts. I have a respectable job in radio although it's a job I'm not really interested in and, unfortunately, I don't make a lot of money. I only take home about 14,500 a year. My real goal is music. I've played in bands and sang solo and sell music that I record at home from a website. So it's 'up in the air' as to whether or not I'll ever be really wealthy. I'm asking because I have managed to get dates and phone numbers but NEVER girlfriends. I can get the attention of nice, attractive women easily but I can't seem to keep their attention very long at all. That loss of their attention always seem to coincide with the first time they see what I drive or when they see where I live or what job I do> I'll also note that this is has been the case my ENTIRE LIFE with EVERY GIRL I'VE MET regardless of what kind of woman they are or where I meet them, whether the girl is a barfly, a girl I met in college or a girl I met in church. Now I have taken my job in radio, where I make a lot less than I even did before. At the same time I did that, I moved back to my family's home town to take a little college. As a result of my lower income I've had to move back in with my folks for the moment. I've noticed, since I've been at this lower payscale and in this present position, that I can't even get that intitial attention from women. I've been saying that the vast majority of women seem to just be interested in money for the most part. Everyone is quick to deny that and they think I'm ridiculous. They'll claim "It's the women you're meeting" even though all of these women are like that regardless of their vastly differing backgrounds and the places or situations where I meet them. When I look at the signs that's the impression I get. I see a lot of people around me, including my friends, in relationships- most of them with really nice looking women. The only difference in me and them that I can see is the income level. In fact there are a lot of guys that are real jerks but they have girlfriends and I don't. What do you think? Honestly, would you possibly be interested in me knowing my status or income level at the moment or would you rather go for a guy that's otherwise about the same as me but made an extra 10K a year and drove a brand new Yukon and owned his own house? Link to post Share on other sites
Tony T Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 I'm sure the ladies will chime in but meanwhile I'll make a few comments. A male with a low income won't mean much if he's very young. A 33-year-old male who makes $14,500 per year may be in for some problems....if he let's the women he dates know what his income is or tells them he lives with his parents. Women your age or even five or six years younger are usually looking for a male who is financially stable or upwardly bound. They seek a male who can provide for them well if the relationship proceeds to marriage. Unfortunately, income has become one of the measuring sticks many females use to evaluate the potential of a future mate. Many have criteria which includes a man having his own car, his own home and a good job...or at least two out of those three. I think if you're looking for a cool relationship, you should concentrate on improving your income situation. At the same time, date around and enjoy companionship of ladies but don't expect things to go too far. Your income is currently near poverty level (not to be insulting or disrespectful). This will not impress most women. Even the very nice ones are looking to maintain or improve their lot in life. Please don't be discouraged. Work hard and your ship will come in, I promise. I just had to get this message to you because you're young and this is the time to become agressive about getting or creating work that will produce a good income. If you have to move home because of your income level now, can you imagine yourself struggling to support a family. Ladies aren't stupid. It's also not cruel in any way for them to look for a male who makes sufficient funds to show them a good time and who has the potential to support a family in the future. Independent women are especially tuned to a man's income. They want someone who will contribute equally to the relationship. You can do it, though. The economy is tight now but you can still go to school, get a real estate license, learn a trade or take other means to increase your income to a level where you can appear financially sufficient to potential mates. Link to post Share on other sites
LauraD Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 Someone who is economically stable is ideal, not because you want to leech off someone else, but rather you feel confident that this person is self-sufficient and can carry their own weight in the relationship. Some women are very materialistic, very money-hungry. Not all. Actually, a lot of women probably have been with well-off men who are terrible partners....and are seeking a trustworthy and good lovin guy this time around (no salary specs needed). But I don't understand why you are having such hard times with the masses. Do you have an approachable personality? Are you putting yourself out there in places age-appropriate? What pool of women are you selecting from? Do you have a "type"? Have you been in a meaningful relationship, a longterm one? After the first date or two, does the woman seem to lose interest or is it the initial hooking of a woman wherein the problem lies?? I really don't think your income is going to make or break your potential for a good relationship. A good woman without dollar signs in her eyes will be attracted to a like-minded, kind, honest, overall good gentleman. Someone who is confident! Someone who makes her feel important and special. If you feel you've got these behaviors down, I really don't know what the deal is. Link to post Share on other sites
LauraD Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 After reading Tony's post, I see that I may have a naive outlook. Yes, Clatan's income is on the meager side. As a woman in her mid-twenties, I suppose I am not as stringent on my requirements for a man's income. I dated someone who was not making a whole lot, but he was the best partner I could ask for--respectful, interested, funny, committed, affectionate, loving, etc. I saw potential for him to do well in the career market later in life, with more experience. But if a man lacks the tools to be loving and supportive to his woman, I could care less what he makes. Money isn't everything. With more money comes less anxiety about the logistics of living and leisure, but it doesn't buy happiness. Clatan, I'd listen to what Tony says. I think he's quite wise. Try to improve yourself, as I am sure you have been. Just don't give up or stop trying to open new doors for yourself. It seems to be a pretty empty goal: make more money to find a woman--but as Tony said, most women respect a man even more if he has the resourcefulness and responsibility and ability to provide sufficiently. We're not talking Ferraris, just a stable kind of life together and perhaps a family. Link to post Share on other sites
Author clatan Posted November 28, 2003 Author Share Posted November 28, 2003 Originally posted by LauraD It seems to be a pretty empty goal: make more money to find a woman--but as Tony said, most women respect a man even more if he has the resourcefulness and responsibility and ability to provide sufficiently. We're not talking Ferraris, just a stable kind of life together and perhaps a family. Thanks Smilies, That's kind of my problem. I'm not being argumentive or anything. Actually I agree with you, especially about the empty goal part. I hate the fact that most all women are about money. That is an empty goal. I don't know how to really word this but I guess an analogy would be best. I don't think I'm going to like the fact that the woman I'm dating is a golddigger any more if I'm the one who owns the mine. If I do make more money some day and suddenly have women all over me, I still wouldn't want them if that's the only reason they want me. If I wasn't good enough before, then they can get lost. See, it would be different if I was only trying to date only rich girls. But most of these girls that look down on me make the same or even much less than I do. Everyone makes the rationalization for this behavior in women by saying that "a woman wants a man who will contribute equally" or "carry their own weight" I have no problem with that. I wouldn't want to marry a woman who has no goals or ambitions who wants to work in a nursing home or in a fast food restuarant her whole life. Not that there's anything wrong with that if that's what makes you happy. But I want someone with similar goals. THey make exuses for these women saying that these "poor girls only want, like Tony said, a man that can provide sufficiently a stable income and secure environment. But that's not the case with most women and that's not what they really want. It might be best if I gave you an example... About three years back when I was 29, before I was in radio, I worked as a maintenance worker at a rock quarry. A dirty job, but it paid really good. I also had a band that I played in on weekends. One New Year's Eve we played a big New Year's bash. I noticed this really hot brunette and all the guys in my band told me that she'd been looking at me all night. After our band finished the next band took the stage. I walked off stage, went to the restroom and was walking towards my table and she came up asked to dance we talked and got to know each other and she was acting as if she was really into me. She even took me over to meet her mother and had her friends take several pictures of us together. SHe gave me her number and the whole nine yards. As the party ended I mentioned that I better go see if I could get a ride home with a friend or one of my bandmates because I'd rose with them and left my truck at home. She said she wouldn't hear of it and said I could ride with her and her friends. She then asked me where I lived. I told her East Kansas, which is the South Side of Saint Joseph, MO, the working-class end of town. It's not crack-alley, but I guess it wasn't the "burbs" like she'd hoped. That's when it fell apart. She first thing she said was "Oh no, you're a 'south-sider' "Oh my god". I said no, I'm not a "south-sider" I just moved to town and that's just where I live. She didn't even speak to me then, until we pulled up to my house. When we pulled up she saw my little S-15 and said "That's your truck?!?!" And I pointed to the house, a nice remodeled but not fancy, well-kept one bedroom home and she reacted just the same. Originally posted by Tony Women your age or even five or six years younger are usually looking for a male who is financially stable or upwardly bound. They seek a male who can provide for them well if the relationship proceeds to marriage. Many have criteria which includes a man having his own car, his own home and a good job...or at least two out of those three. It's also not cruel in any way for them to look for a male who makes sufficient funds to show them a good time and who has the potential to support a family in the future. Here's the really absurd thing. She was a 23-year-old school teacher. I know what school teachers make an I know they make even less starting out. Although my job isn't glamorous, neither is hers and I know for a fact that I make at least $6,000 more than she does! I owned a home. She lived with her parents! But I am below her?!?! If a woman really, truly wants only someone who will be on the same level as her and be able to provide a sufficient income that's perfectly understandable Then they should have no problem with me. I make $18,500 gross a year most women in this area I now live in don't make any more than that. If we were to get married that would be nearly $40,000 a year between us both just starting out. That would by a nice home in a nice neighborhood, two nice cars with plenty left to pay the bills. So that shouldn't be a problem. But women aren't interested in me still. They want the big prize. That's why I say most of them are golddiggers. Tony, thanks for your post. I appreciate you taking all that time to answer me. I agree with what you've said. I'm not arguing per se but this quote from your post kind of says what I'm trying to say. It was this line of your post... Originally posted by Tony Even the very nice ones are looking to maintain or improve their lot in life. It's also not cruel in any way for them to look for a male who makes sufficient funds to show them a good time and who has the potential to support a family in the future. Then later in the same post you said... Originally posted by Tony Independent women are especially tuned to a man's income. They want someone who will contribute equally to the relationship. The kind of woman that wants only a guy that will improve her lot in life or that has sufficient money to show her a good time isn't my idea of an independent woman. And this also.... Originally posted by Tony You can do it, though. The economy is tight now but you can still go to school, get a real estate license, learn a trade or take other means to increase your income to a level where you can appear financially sufficient to potential mates. It's not as if I'm some unskilled, high-school drop out with no work skills. That's not the case. I was a near straight 'A' student in both college and high school. I have a lot of computer skills. I have a lot of job experience in mechanics, computers, operating heavy equipment. My main interest is music. I sing, play guitar and harmonica and I am VERY GOOD AT IT and I have a lot of potential in both music and other fields and I am currently doing something about it. In the meantime, I have a low paying but respectable and sufficient job I drive a really nice newer Volkswagen. I'm not on skid row![ Secondly.... To quote Tony again... "If you have to move home because of your income level now, can you imagine yourself struggling to support a family.... take other means to increase your income to a level where you can appear financially sufficient to potential mates." Well the only reason my income level is low now is because I moved to go back to college and there aren't many good paying jobs in this rural area I live in. I don't plan to be in this situation forever. Besides, I am financialy sufficient. I live at home, sure but if I really had to, I could have a small apartment. But I don't see a need in that extra expense of paying for an apartment 5 miles from my parent's home, since I don't make a lot right now and my parents have an empty room. I think any reasonable woman can see that I'm not a bum or pathetic loser that will live like this forever. That's why I say they're golddiggers. Any decent, truly nice girl would look past the here and now and see the potential in a guy and not judge him for the job her currently has, where he currently lives. She would support and beleive in him, not pass him by and turn her nose up because not presently a sure thing for the big bucks. In past posts, people have replied by saying "those women are not greedy. A woman wants a guy with ambition" Yeah. they want a guy with ambition, but only if that ambition equates into a lot of money in the here and now. That is a, exuse my language but I think it's appropriate, GOLD DIGGING WHORE! Link to post Share on other sites
Author clatan Posted November 28, 2003 Author Share Posted November 28, 2003 You know I've had a lot of people give me this advice.... "Well women want to know that a man is a good provider and that they can support them and a family. Many women want to maybe have a little bit better lot in life than they do at present. THere's nothing wrong with either of those. For now, don't worry about that. In the meantime, keep going to college, play your music though of course and keep after it. Keep working towards your goals. If you work hard, you'll find success and women will see that you are financially stable and a quality mate and then the right girl will surely come along." I'll admit that I find myself thinking the same thing. Don't get me wrong. I'm not criticizing. But when you think about it, it is kind of circular reasoning I guess you'd call it or like Smilies said "An empty goal." Think about it. Here's what that would sound like if it where a woman's equivalent of me.... Posted by Jane.. Every guy I've ever dated has dumped me because I won't have sex with him. All most guys want is a girl that will 'put-out'. Now it's a known fact that I don't and few of the guys in my town will have anything to do with me. Sure, I can attract a guy and get plenty of dates but it doesn't go very far when I tell them that I'm waiting 'til I get married. They always dump me then. I know guys want to have sex and that it's part of a relationship. I want to have sex too. But I want to wait until marriage. I know if I did give in that it's more than likely that they could dump me anyway after they get what they want. I'd like to know that a guy likes me for 'me' and who I am not because I sleep with them. Posted by John..... Well Jane, I know how it must feel but you do have to realize that men are a little different. Men needs and most men want to have these need met physically. A lot of guys just naturally express themselves that way. They want to know that they are loved through physical means as well as emotional means. Who knows? Maybe there are some sexual acts that they would want that you'd be unwilling to perform. Maybe you're sexual performance isn't what he wants. Maybe you wouldn't want to have sex as often as him. Maybe he's too big for you. Maybe he, for instance, like oral sex and it disgusts you. Or maybe you don't give good head and drag your teeth. He might want to know all of this before he decides to spend the rest of his life with you. It's sad to say but a lot of guys are like this. Some of them might dump you because they feel that you are rejecting them in some way. Don't worry just give in. Start screwing these guys like a cheap two-bit whore. Hell, bang every guy in town. At least wear some low cut blouses and short skirts and try to look attractive and hot to trot for some sex-crazed guys. Go out to a bar pantyless once in a while. You don't have to go all the way... the next date you have at least give him a hummer or a handjob in the car when he drops you off. Hell, there are plenty of guys that would will take you up on some cheap sex, beleive me. If you show a guy that you are willing to screw his brains out at the snap of a finger or at least keep him happy by jerking him off once in a while you'll find one that will stick around eventually! Link to post Share on other sites
Tony T Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 Well, clatan, you've done an excellent job of trying to rationalize your situation and avoid reality. I'm not going to get in a debate with you. I will say that any woman who seeks a man who has financial stability and a means to support her is not a golddigging whore. She's a sane, rational person who's not about to make the stupid move of getting involved with a male who may eventually take her and her future kids into a life of poverty. I also resent your statement regarding school teachers. Educating our children is probably one of the most important jobs a person can have. Maybe it's not glamourous in your eyes but for you to define people by what they do is absurd. Now I see that perhaps it's your attitude, and NOT your income, that's driving women away from you. If you take the time with everybody who expresses an honest opinion to let them know why their opinion is inaccurate, not only will you die without a mate but you will have few friends as well. Get some help from a good counsellor and, when you go, take him/her a print out of this thread. Link to post Share on other sites
Author clatan Posted November 28, 2003 Author Share Posted November 28, 2003 Originally posted by Tony I also resent your statement regarding school teachers. Educating our children is probably one of the most important jobs a person can have. Maybe it's not glamourous in your eyes but for you to define people by what they do is absurd. Hi Tony, I'm really sorry. I appreciate your post. That wasn't what I meant though. I didn't say her job was unimportant. I said her job wasn't glamorous and niether was mine. I think a teacher is a fine respectable job and I would never put down anyone's job. I'm not gauging people by what they do for a living. I didn't say "Oh, my god you're a teacher." Oh, my god you live at home!" the minute I met her. She was the one who was gauging me by what I did for a living. I was telling what she did for a living and what she made to illustrate the fact that she was not simply wanting someone "on her level." She was no better than me but, the fact that I had a 'blue-collar job' makes her think I'm below her when I'm actually more financially stable than she is. Don't you think that was really rude and snobbish of her, and at the very least, hypocritical? So you think she is right to act like that? Just because she's a white collar and I was a blue? Link to post Share on other sites
Tony T Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 "So you think she is right to act like that? Just because she's a white collar and I was a blue?" Her actions weren't right or wrong, they just were. It's your job as an active dater to make a decision, based on behavior, as to whether or not you want to be around her or anybody else again. She has a right to "guage" you based on anything she wishes, including but not limited to, your income, your living arrangements, your car, your personality, your educational background, your religion, your family, your height, your weight, your hair, your eye color, your breath, etc. It's done every minute of every day. I'm beginning to think you have some sort of persecution complex that may need professional attention. However, the fact remains that human nature is such that people want to surround themselves...especially on a permanent basis...with positive people who at least have a potential for great success. I do want to tell you that there are many very poor but extremely successful people. William Shakespeare didn't have a lot of money but he had the words to seduce the ladies. If you're going to spend all your energy on this thread rather than planning a future, then change your attitude and develop other things about yourself that will be enticing to the ladies. Most women aren't looking for a lot of money, but they do want security. Sometimes that security doesn't come in the form of money, but rather a supportive, warm, stable and confident attitude that perhaps you need to work on improving. I can tell you for a fact, women love poetry written especially for them. It never fails. And they never worry about how much money you make...at least not at that particular moment. All it costs is a pen or pencil and a piece of paper. Link to post Share on other sites
Author clatan Posted November 28, 2003 Author Share Posted November 28, 2003 http://www.clayrains.com/clay1_sm.jpg I agree and see what you are saying. But I just think that attituse was a little snobbish in this case. Link to post Share on other sites
yogi-mon Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 Well it might. A little. But your personality still plays a HHHHHUUUUUUUUGGGGGEEEE role. For example. Most of the women my age (25) do not seem to care about the fact that I pull in close to $100,000.00 a year AFTER TAXES (sometimes more). Girls my age are more interested in different things. I think that is one of the reason I seem to attract alot of older women heheh.. Most women do not take the time to get to know me because of other factors, most likely of which are 2 things: Lack of self confidence, or sometimes, over-confidence, and personality issues. If money is affecting your self confidence, I suggest you do something about it. But if your a great guy, I suspect that a girl out there will really look at you in a serious way, regardless of your financial situation. Here is something to consider, on behalf of the Money Matters argument. Money does a few things: Vacations. Expensive dinners, (often) Nice place of residence, Nice cars, Toys such as plasma TVs, xbox, dvd, computers, laptops, and very nice clothing. Now I ask: Do any of the above things matter? On a truthful basis: No. They dont. BUT, if you had 2 girls, identical, perfect clones. One was rich, and one was poor, which one would you likely choose? Link to post Share on other sites
Author clatan Posted November 28, 2003 Author Share Posted November 28, 2003 Oh sure, I'd pick the one with the money, that is if they where exact in personality too. But that would never be a real-life scenario. Even human clones, which as far as most of us know don't exist, would likely have some personality differences. Link to post Share on other sites
yogi-mon Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 Is money affecting your self confidence? I can tell you, from first hand experience, its something that impresses a girl, but thats all. Its like, for example your skill with music. She hears your music, she likes it, shes IMPRESSED. She sais, O, I like clatan, I love his music, its a turn on. When a girl meets a man with money, and she steps into a nice leather interior of a nice sports car, and hes dressed to the nines, she is IMPRESSED. She sais, woah, this guys setup.. impressive. When she opens the door to his lavish downtown condo in a good part of town and sees a nice, clean, apartment fully furnished with cool stuff, like plasma TVs she is IMPRESSED. She thinks, woah, I wonder what it would be like to live here. When she sees a cockroach infested apartment, in a dangerous area of town, she thinks, woah, I wouldnt wanna live in that place Link to post Share on other sites
Tony T Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 "When she sees a cockroach infested apartment, in a dangerous area of town, she thinks, woah, I wouldnt wanna live in that place" So what the hell's wrong with cockroaches? You think that could be my problem??? Link to post Share on other sites
yogi-mon Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 I think this might be true, but I'd need a girls opinion on this. I think once a girl has been exposed to a relationship with a decent guy, who happens to have alot of money - it affects her standard and expectations of future men. Having money is very easy to get used to. Its comfortable. And going back, IE going from having money to not having money is painful for everyone, including women. So, its definitly something they like and enjoy. They know, hey - no matter what, I wont have to worry about money. I can always order that extra drink, or that extra lobster. I feel like a vacation, - ok. That kind of stuff is hard to go back from. Link to post Share on other sites
lostforwords Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 GOOD MORNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think once a girl has been exposed to a relationship with a decent guy, who happens to have alot of money - it affects her standard and expectations of future men Thats the biggest load of CRAP ive ever heard........ i went from money to not a lot.... to not alot to money...... and again from money to NOT ALOT etc etc......... some women it just doesnt matter..... as long as you can hold your own..... eventually tho if all your expectations is gonna be below 20,000. and your comfortable with staying like that for the rest of your life.... just dont be expecting her to be sitting comfortable, eventually shes gonna want you to make be more comfortable than your 14000 job can provide.... especially if its gonna be providing for a family eventually...... and yogi.... i see your advertising again.... lolololol...... Link to post Share on other sites
yogi-mon Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 I dont know where you get your opinions. But I am going to say this. IF YOU TOOK THE TIME TO READ what I said above, you might change your view on what I said. Please see my thread "Does This Matter" Link to post Share on other sites
lostforwords Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 I dont know where you get your opinions. But I am going to say this. IF YOU TOOK THE TIME TO READ what I said above, you might change your view on what I said. yogi LOOK at my post again..... go on.. look at it.... do you see the part in quotations??????? ok... now do you see where i said it was a load of crap....... ok... now look at the part in quotations again.... thats it.... u making the connection yet?..... ok.. whew!! now that youve made the obvious connection of knowing that THAT was what i was BASING my opinion on.... i am not disputing ALL of what you said...THATS why only the part i didnt AGREE with is in quotations.... simmah down yogi you still pissed cuz of yesterdays posts? lololol Link to post Share on other sites
SoleMate Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 Clatan, thanks for your posts, because I do think I understand a lot better now where you're coming from. You sound pretty hurt and disappointed about all the rejection. And who wouldn't be? I'm not going to lecture you or give you a self-improvement plan. I think you've already had plenty of that, and besides, I don't really think that you need to be fixed. I just want to tell you about myself and my feelings on this topic, so you have one more data point to add. I have thought a lot about the gold digger issue myself. Not because I am one - I make a 6 figure plus income and have worked for pay for my entire adult life. The reason gold digging comes up in my mind is because I so often hear it talked about by men - and then I see men going looking for women in a way that is GUARANTEED to yield gold diggers! Let me hasten to say, I don't think YOU are (necessarily) doing this. But just let me mention...the guy who pulls up in his expensive sports car (I don't know him from Adam) and offers me a ride...the guy with the flashy clothes...the guy who talks on and on about his boat and truck, not for the fun he's had using them, but for what they "say" about him...the guy who's unattractive in body or personality and quickly offers elaborate gifts, expensive restaurant meals, and other "things" because he thinks it's the only "bait" he can offer. Not only do I not go for these guys, I make a U-turn and get them out of my sight ASAP. The number one thing I look for in a man is manly charm, which (for me) means he's friendly, smiling, cheerful, good looking, fit, intelligent, polite, good smelling, and INTERESTED IN ME! When I get to know him a bit better I look for good sense of humor, ability to make me laugh, easy going, active (not a couch sitter), fair, good dancer, good kisser/hugger/toucher, honest, ethical, courteous and attentive. The bottom line question is: Do I enjoy being with him? How do I feel when we are together? If I feel good and he has (many of) the qualities above, he is a winner as a companion and "fun" boyfriend. From your emails, I know you are intelligent and thoughtful, and you are able to have an honest discussion about important issues. And if that's a picture of you, you are a major hunk! (Can't tell how you smell but I'm sure it's good.) So I admit it's hard to see why non-marriage minded girls aren't interested in spending time with you. You know, goof around stuff like fishing, the beach, picnics, playing music in the park, dinner at home, dancing. Here's something you may not have thought of in this detail: As you know, even the strongest, most financially independent woman is likely to want a family. And she likely knows, just from observing life, that a woman in the childbearing stage can be a vulnerable person. Even a normal pregnancy definitely reduces her earning power; if there are complications, she may be disabled and out of work for many months. Care of a single normal child also hammers the income potential of a mother; if there are twins, health problems, handicaps, or even just severe crankiness, forget earning much money through work. She will want to be able to depend on her husband. She may need to put her financial wellbeing partially or entirely in his hands, perhaps for many years as the children are reared. For an independent woman, this can be very scary. Imagine YOU putting that kind of power over your life into the hands of another person. Just think of the risks: substance abuse, unemployment, desertion, flakiness, "don't want to be married", mental illness. Most of them end up with the woman becoming a single mother and plunging into the underclass. Would you put your life into another person's hands? What would make you WANT to do it? What would you want that person to be? Please think about the issue of women's potential vulnerability, and how and why the smart ones search for dependability. Not to dig for gold...just to have a big, strong man to lean on and to hold on to and love, who will always be there. That's one of the things we love about you guys. Last point...the "really hot brunette" in the bar. You judged her on the surface and she judged you on the surface. Was there a plain girl in the bar...or maybe a less flashy, yet still charming, girl sitting at home with a book...longing for someone just like you to walk into her world? I say YES. Have you thought about trying to find a woman who thinks like you think and wants what you want? How would you go about it? Good luck! Link to post Share on other sites
yogi-mon Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 SoleMate: I agree with what your saying. But I just want to clarify one thing, because I think your getting the wrong idea. This isnt all the guy has to offer. Ideally, you know, he doesnt "pull up in some sports car" maybe you met him in a normal place, like a library, or through a friend. And then you FIND OUT he has millions. THAT impresses a girl The same way a girl is impressed when she finds out he can play music or this, or that. They are bonus's. ONLY. Flaunting wealth is disgusting. I 100% agree with that. Infact, flaunting ANYTHING is disgusting. Link to post Share on other sites
steveb Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 I am so glad I found you guys. I enjoy that most of you are caring people, but willing to be straight with people. I have learned more about myself by reading about others than I could have emagined. You guys do not tend to go for the quick answer. You actually help. Link to post Share on other sites
lostforwords Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 awwwww steve i know exactly what you mean..... aside from the few odd ones that come in and advertise themselves.... its actually pretty awesome here..... love your post btw about the plastic throat and mouth!!!! ROFL Link to post Share on other sites
yogi-mon Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 ok because I said, I think money is an "ATTRACTIVE" quality. I am advertising. I said, I have money, and it dont make a ****in difference to women. ok - i am getting a little bit sick of being shot down for saying what I think. Link to post Share on other sites
steveb Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 Yogi-mon, I may be wrong, but I made the assuption that she was referring to the teenager's and their questions that seem to have their own mislead answers built in. Although, I definatley see a tit-for-tat thing between you two. Link to post Share on other sites
yogi-mon Posted November 28, 2003 Share Posted November 28, 2003 steve in a earlier in this thread, she told me I was advertising. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts