GoodOnPaper Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 I’m thinking insult. It seems that many women who express an interest in LTRs dismiss men who are “bf material” as secondary sex options. Does this mean that sex in ONSs/FWBs is better than in a committed relationship? If so, what’s the draw to “bf material” guys for LTRs? If not, why wouldn’t the “bf material” guy be one to look to for a ONS or FWB? I know one easy response is that men have been categorizing women this way for centuries and that turnabout is fair play, but unfortunately, I’ve never had a ONS or FWB, so I have to find out these things second-hand. The few women I attracted when single had me pegged squarely in “bf material” territory. At the time, I had this crazy notion that sex and intimacy in a committed relationship would be at least as good as what could happen in a ONS or FWB relationship, but I now feel that that was naïve. Link to post Share on other sites
Not the love ace Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 Eh, don't take it serious. Its only a saying, who cares my friend. Take it as a compliment, AT LEAST they think you're attractive. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts