Ariadne Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 and compliment my pictures... Just so you know... SaC is "adorable". That's the best word to describe her. She is tall, blonde, blue eyed, has the cutest most interesting face I've ever seen and the most beautiful eyes. (She's Eastern European). And... on top of that.. has a voluptuous body with huge tits and perfect butt and tiny waist. Kind of like those pin up models. Link to post Share on other sites
Author SadandConfusedWA Posted June 13, 2010 Author Share Posted June 13, 2010 Just so you know... SaC is "adorable". That's the best word to describe her. She is tall, blonde, blue eyed, has the cutest most interesting face I've ever seen and the most beautiful eyes. (She's Eastern European). And... on top of that.. has a voluptuous body with huge tits and perfect butt and tiny waist. Kind of like those pin up models. Aw thanks Ariadne how sweet of you to say that, I appreciate it Link to post Share on other sites
allina Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 I'm not a guy, but imo any guy that's turned off by that is an idiot you probably shouldn't date anyways. Any man worth being your bf will be impressed and turned on by the idea of a hot, young, successful, brainy chick. Link to post Share on other sites
Author SadandConfusedWA Posted June 13, 2010 Author Share Posted June 13, 2010 I'm not a guy, but imo any guy that's turned off by that is an idiot you probably shouldn't date anyways. Any man worth being your bf will be impressed and turned on by the idea of a hot, young, successful, brainy chick. Thanks allina Link to post Share on other sites
Bangle Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Any man worth being your bf will be impressed and turned on by the idea of a hot, young, successful, brainy chick. You said it! Providing she doesn't throw it my face. A lot of educated people are very rude, I am not an educated man and because of this people speak to me like I am inferior and this is not something I put up with for too long. Link to post Share on other sites
sagetalk Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 1. If you knew me in person, you would see that I am FAR for stuck up. I put myself down a lot with self-depreciating humor - too much it seems as my good friends tell me. But those online guys never see any of that...because they stop corresponding way before a meeting is set up. 2. My job is FAR from "boring". I do work with lot of males but they are ALL taken. I mean ALL of them are at least living with a partner. And yes, I get along great with them and we have lots of other things in common too (not just research). Interestingly, most of their partners are the equvivalent of a coffee-shop girl, many have not even finished college. Not that there is anything wrong with that, it's just odd that those highly educated men would not seek someone even remotely similar. 1. You can be stuck up and put yourself down. When girls like Jennifer Love Hewitt call themselves nerds . It's extremely lame. Being stuck up means you think you're better than other people because you have a PhD/are pretty/are poular. It's hard to describe a stuck up person, but it's easy to spot them in person. 2. Intellectual girls can be extremely difficult to date. I consider myself an intellectual, INTJ personality and I hope to start a PhD soon. First, they are usually hard to find socially, reclusive. Second, they are usually very liberal politically and lean in the extreme feminist territory which shrinks their dating pool alot (scares guys off). Third, it's easy for intellectual men to get stuck in the friendzone with them because these girls are such great conversationalists. I love intelligent, highly educated women, but they are definitely one of the harder female types to date. Link to post Share on other sites
sagetalk Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Just so you know... SaC is "adorable". That's the best word to describe her. She is tall, blonde, blue eyed, has the cutest most interesting face I've ever seen and the most beautiful eyes. (She's Eastern European). And... on top of that.. has a voluptuous body with huge tits and perfect butt and tiny waist. Kind of like those pin up models. To describe a woman like that and not post pictures is cruel, just cruel . Link to post Share on other sites
tigressA Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 My job is FAR from "boring". I do work with lot of males but they are ALL taken. I mean ALL of them are at least living with a partner. And yes, I get along great with them and we have lots of other things in common too (not just research). Interestingly, most of their partners are the equvivalent of a coffee-shop girl, many have not even finished college. Not that there is anything wrong with that, it's just odd that those highly educated men would not seek someone even remotely similar. On the other hand, I would approximate that about 60% of the female academics are in their 30's and single. That is more than a concidence. This reminds me of something Crazy Magnet said in the education thread--that when she dated some guys who were on the same playing field as her with regard to education/career, that they expected her to sacrifice what she was doing for their sake because they felt it was "more important". I think a lot of men who are highly educated--masters and above--still feel that need to be superior to the woman that they're with, be the big, smart guy, the provider. Any woman who's on their level would make them feel insecure, possibly even useless. These men must not want an equal in terms of education and/or intellect for a partner--they want someone who would be in awe of what they do. And usually, a less-educated woman fits the bill. It's unfortunate. Link to post Share on other sites
Author SadandConfusedWA Posted June 13, 2010 Author Share Posted June 13, 2010 To be fair, I think that Ariadne is just being a good friend. I am not that good. I am an OK, slightly above average looking girl, but am in no way exceptional. Link to post Share on other sites
Lakeside_runner Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 This reminds me of something Crazy Magnet said in the education thread--that when she dated some guys who were on the same playing field as her with regard to education/career, that they expected her to sacrifice what she was doing for their sake because they felt it was "more important". I think a lot of men who are highly educated--masters and above--still feel that need to be superior to the woman that they're with, be the big, smart guy, the provider. Any woman who's on their level would make them feel insecure, possibly even useless. These men must not want an equal in terms of education and/or intellect for a partner--they want someone who would be in awe of what they do. And usually, a less-educated woman fits the bill. It's unfortunate. I'll disagree with that. Simply put - it is very hard to find someone who's compatible. Imagine getting a PhD and meeting someone who's getting a PhD as well. Then as you both graduate chances that you'll get a position at the same university (presuming you're both staying in academia) are very close to zero. Now, the fact that these men are not willing to give up what they've achieved is not hard to understand. It's not like doing a PhD is easier for a guy than for a woman. Ultimately we're all human beings. There's a simple thought behind it: I've come so far - why do I have to give it up now? This works both ways. Women most probably feel that way too. I've been in a relationship where I was supportive of my GF and encouraged her to achieve higher and higher goals. She had the potential to become so much more. Well, she represented the point of view that people do not have to strive for improvement and development. She even said at multiple occasions that in a relationship the person who achieved more should lower their level to the other person... So much for support from her side. Link to post Share on other sites
sagetalk Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 This reminds me of something Crazy Magnet said in the education thread--that when she dated some guys who were on the same playing field as her with regard to education/career, that they expected her to sacrifice what she was doing for their sake because they felt it was "more important". I think a lot of men who are highly educated--masters and above--still feel that need to be superior to the woman that they're with, be the big, smart guy, the provider. Any woman who's on their level would make them feel insecure, possibly even useless. These men must not want an equal in terms of education and/or intellect for a partner--they want someone who would be in awe of what they do. And usually, a less-educated woman fits the bill. It's unfortunate. It's purely logical. A woman's career gets put on hold when she has kids, therefore the man's career must take precedence. It's the safest decision to protect the families' income. It has nothing to do with hating women or being jealous of their career. Give guys the benefit of the doubt, we aren't all evil, alpha male warlords trying to make women miserable and obey our every command. This is the exact attitude of why I said intellectual, highly educated women are hard to date. They always think men are trying to suppress them and all that feminist poison they are fed in college. Link to post Share on other sites
tigressA Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 It's purely logical. A woman's career gets put on hold when she has kids, therefore the man's career must take precedence. It's the safest decision to protect the families' income. It has nothing to do with hating women or being jealous of their career. Give guys the benefit of the doubt, we aren't all evil, alpha male warlords trying to make women miserable and obey our every command. This is the exact attitude of why I said intellectual, highly educated women are hard to date. They always think men are trying to suppress them and all that feminist poison they are fed in college. Are you kidding me?! I in no way meant that as a man-hating post. It was merely an observation. I did not say that men are trying to suppress women. Get over yourself; stop seeing "feminist poison" where there isn't any! :sick: Link to post Share on other sites
Lakeside_runner Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Are you kidding me?! I in no way meant that as a man-hating post. It was merely an observation. I did not say that men are trying to suppress women. Get over yourself; stop seeing "feminist poison" where there isn't any! :sick: Well, in sagetalk's defense (although I'm sure he's capable of doing it himself) - I had a similar impression after reading your post as him. Link to post Share on other sites
tigressA Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Yeah, well I'll just say again that that was not my intention, and drop it. Link to post Share on other sites
Els Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 It's purely logical. A woman's career gets put on hold when she has kids, therefore the man's career must take precedence. It's the safest decision to protect the families' income. It has nothing to do with hating women or being jealous of their career. Give guys the benefit of the doubt, we aren't all evil, alpha male warlords trying to make women miserable and obey our every command. This is the exact attitude of why I said intellectual, highly educated women are hard to date. They always think men are trying to suppress them and all that feminist poison they are fed in college. It's all well and good if this is what you wish for your own relationship, as long as you believe in the man providing and paying for the woman as well. Yes, and I do mean before marriage, unless you expect the woman to begin giving the man's career precedence after they are married only. However, for others, especially those who do not wish to have children anytime in the near future, their views may differ. Link to post Share on other sites
Ariadne Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 (edited) To be fair, I think that Ariadne is just being a good friend. I am not that good. I am an OK, slightly above average looking girl, but am in no way exceptional. grrr....... I just "wish" I could post your last pic from the facebook. They would die!!!! And if I post some others that you have you'll be Miss Forum. (She's really amazing people and she's being modest or doesn't know how beautiful she really is). Edited June 13, 2010 by Ariadne Link to post Share on other sites
Ariadne Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 I'll just mention something though... That when I showed SaC's pictures to my 20 yr old son, he told me that not in a million years he would approach her. That she looks completely intimidating and a "sure no". Not sure why he said that, but he said the same exact thing of my picture. We both give him the same feeling of get lost. Link to post Share on other sites
Engadget Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Just so you know... SaC is "adorable". That's the best word to describe her. She is tall, blonde, blue eyed, has the cutest most interesting face I've ever seen and the most beautiful eyes. (She's Eastern European). And... on top of that.. has a voluptuous body with huge tits and perfect butt and tiny waist. Kind of like those pin up models. Ariadne I think you quoted the wrong person there, I didn't say that. Link to post Share on other sites
Ariadne Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Ariadne I think you quoted the wrong person there, I didn't say that. Haha... sorry about that. I'm not sure how your name got there. That was SaC who said that. Link to post Share on other sites
Author SadandConfusedWA Posted June 13, 2010 Author Share Posted June 13, 2010 Interesting update: One of the guys that stopped responding just AIMed me. We had a quick chat. He apologized for not responding and exaplained that he was intimidated. That he felt like he has nothing to offer as in I am better looking than him, more educated, have better job... so he felt like he would pre-emptively reject me first. But now he is having second thoughts and would like to meet me after all. This is kind of a turn off for me but should I meet him for a drink? Link to post Share on other sites
tigressA Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Interesting update: One of the guys that stopped responding just AIMed me. We had a quick chat. He apologized for not responding and exaplained that he was intimidated. That he felt like he has nothing to offer as in I am better looking than him, more educated, have better job... so he felt like he would pre-emptively reject me first. But now he is having second thoughts and would like to meet me after all. This is kind of a turn off for me but should I meet him for a drink? Wow. That IS really interesting. Hmm...I feel you on the turn-off bit; I think I would be too, a little bit. On the other hand, he did own up to feeling intimidated, and not a lot of people would do that. He was honest with you. If I were in your place, I'd meet him. Give him a chance, see where it goes. You could end up really hitting it off in person. Link to post Share on other sites
Ariadne Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 This is kind of a turn off for me but should I meet him for a drink? Well, at least he's being honest, that a start. Link to post Share on other sites
Author SadandConfusedWA Posted June 13, 2010 Author Share Posted June 13, 2010 Wow. That IS really interesting. Hmm...I feel you on the turn-off bit; I think I would be too, a little bit. On the other hand, he did own up to feeling intimidated, and not a lot of people would do that. He was honest with you. If I were in your place, I'd meet him. Give him a chance, see where it goes. You could end up really hitting it off in person. Yeah, I think I will see if there is chemistry in person. He now gave me his mobile number, his home number, his e-mail and his first and last name lol. I have to admit that I really felt down on myself for being rejected but this makes me feel better. As long as he doesn't need conastant re-assurance later on. Some other guy I was chatting to asked me about my favorite sexual position within the 5 mins of the chat so he is out. Link to post Share on other sites
Lakeside_runner Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Some other guy I was chatting to asked me about my favorite sexual position within the 5 mins of the chat so he is out. :Lakeside_runner banging his head against his desk: Link to post Share on other sites
Bangle Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 I'll just mention something though... That when I showed SaC's pictures to my 20 yr old son, he told me that not in a million years he would approach her. That she looks completely intimidating and a "sure no". Not sure why he said that, but he said the same exact thing of my picture. We both give him the same feeling of get lost. You fancy your son? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts