homosexuality vs. incest vs. beastiality,polygamy,etc.

[loverofloveandstuff]

Yes, and I established very clearly that the two are fundamentally invalid comparisons. Incestuous relationships transcend sexual orientation. The comparison of the two is fundamentally invalid.

 

Incest has little to do with innate sexual orientation. To say an unrelated homosexual couple is like an incestuous couple must require that one can say an unrelated heterosexual couple is like an incestuous couple. The comparison is horribly flawed.

 

This is not a debate centred on sexual orientation!! This is a debate justifying the relationship of consenting adults in different kinds of relationships. It is not "fundamentally invalid" at all.

 

The comparison is only "horribly flawed" because you find it offensive.

Edited December 19, 2010 by loverofloveandstuff

[creighton0123]

This is not a debate centred on sexual orientation!! This is a debate justifying the relationship of consenting adults in different kinds of relationships. It is not "fundamentally invalid" at all.

 

The comparison is only "horribly flawed" because you find it offensive.

 

It really is fundamentally invalid... Like... really, really is. It is not about being offensive.

 

If a person is in an incestuous relationship and that relationship ends, the person is in no way, shape, or form, innately incestuous. The person is either gay, straight, or bisexual.

 

If a person is in a relationship with someone of the opposite gender and is attracted to the opposite gender, the person is still heterosexual if the relationship ends.

 

If a person is in a relationship with someone of the same-gender and is attracted to the same or both genders, the person is still gay or bisexual.

 

The comparison is fundamentally and rationally flawed. I can't understand how you're unable to see this...

[loverofloveandstuff]

It really is fundamentally invalid... Like... really, really is. It is not about being offensive.

 

If a person is in an incestuous relationship and that relationship ends, the person is in no way, shape, or form, innately incestuous. The person is either gay, straight, or bisexual.

 

If a person is in a relationship with someone of the opposite gender and is attracted to the opposite gender, the person is still heterosexual if the relationship ends.

 

If a person is in a relationship with someone of the same-gender and is attracted to the same or both genders, the person is still gay or bisexual.

 

The comparison is fundamentally and rationally flawed. I can't understand how you're unable to see this...

 

For the last time, this is not a debate about sexual orientation. I don't care that people are not innately incestuous. You cannot prove that people are innately homosexual either. That is not relevant, at all.

 

If you really can't see that this is a valid discussion I don't know why you've bothered to debate in this thread. If this debate is really invalid, all of your arguments justifying homosexuality, but not incest are too.

[Tony]

Thread has taken on a nasty tone, gone from academic to pornographic. Young teens come here and they don't need to see adults getting in the gutter like this. THREAD CLOSED and don't start another gutter thread. Thanks and thank all of you who kept it on topic.