Saxis Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Male Age: 29 Height: 5'8" Weight: 165 Waist: 32-34 The last couple years I've put more on in the mid-section. X was fattening me up! I'm small framed and probably appear shorter than I am. I'd like to stay around this weight, tone the middle and bulk up my arms and legs though. I've got a crappy cell pic in my profile, but it doesn't show much. Link to post Share on other sites
Engadget Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Male 5'10'' 200lbs Waist: 34 I'm overweight (obviously) but I don't give a ****. In a month I could be down to 180, which is my normal weight but the BS BMI index says still isn't normal for me. BMI is a joke by the way. Link to post Share on other sites
lastresort Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 I wouldn't take all of what you read on here too seriously. You can kind of read through those that are being truthful. It is really easy to type what you want when you have no one to answer too. Male, 37, 6'2", 260lbs, 36"W I have lost 50lbs since January and still going in that direction. have dropped 6" off my waist. I do prefer a tall women 5'8" or taller, body size doesn't really bother me. sounds cheesy but a good personality and confidence is what i look for. I was in a marriage that until about a month ago i thought was right, now that i have been "freed" i realize that I was not the person she married and she is not the one i married, now i look for a girl that likes me for who i am. I am a bit on the crazy out-going side and that is not what my STBXW wanted and i formed into the person she wanted and i hated me and her for it. Now raising my two sons is very important to me, which i have 4 days a week, she was all about money and buying a big home and living a fake life we couldn't afford, i like to survive and just have a good time. Link to post Share on other sites
lastresort Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 (edited) Male BMI is a joke by the way. i totally agree... people are always blown away when i tell them what i weigh. They say dude your not that big. I am a big guy played football through college. I am actually smaller than most my friends. I will never be "Normal" size. BUt it's OK cause i will kick your A** if you have something to say to me. lol Edited July 12, 2011 by lastresort Link to post Share on other sites
stefspets Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Just got on the scale this morning and it read 152. I'm PMSing though so I like to think that's closer to 149. But yes, I'm positive! That's how much I weigh! My BFF weighs about 15 less than I do, is shorter, and yet is physically larger - at least in the hips/butt. You said you're really active, right? So that weight for you includes a lot of muscle mass and is healthy. I'm 5'9", ~150 pounds (F). I feel skinny fat though--I'm not overweight by BMI measures, and I feel ok but I know I could use more muscle. I'm not really wanting to change my weight, just my body composition. Link to post Share on other sites
GorillaTheater Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 5'9", 165 lbs, 32" waist. For a guy pushing 50, I figure I'm doing okay. Link to post Share on other sites
make me believe Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 28 years old 5'7" 120 lbs I vacillate between 115 and 120. Ive been this weight since I was about 20 and I'm happy with it. In high school I was the same height and only about 105 lbs. I think I looked too skinny. I am small framed though and had a hard time gaining any weight. I have a twin sis with the same stats as me. Link to post Share on other sites
fishtaco Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Male 40 yrs old 5'10" 165 lbs I can wear 32 - 34 pants. But 34 would be a bit loose on me. BMI says I'm fat at 176. My goal is to exceed that and not be fat. But I'm a hard gainer, so progress is slow. Link to post Share on other sites
mo mo Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 Male 40 yrs old 5'10" 165 lbs I can wear 32 - 34 pants. But 34 would be a bit loose on me. BMI says I'm fat at 176. My goal is to exceed that and not be fat. But I'm a hard gainer, so progress is slow. And this is why BMI is a joke. I weigh a whole 70lbs more than you. We are the same height. I am only one pant size bigger than you. What the hell is the point of BMI anyway if there is so much fail involved? Link to post Share on other sites
Feelsgoodman Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 And this is why BMI is a joke. I weigh a whole 70lbs more than you. We are the same height. I am only one pant size bigger than you. What the hell is the point of BMI anyway if there is so much fail involved? BMI is an approximation (just like IQ tests, SATs, and other standardized forms of testing/measuring). You can't expect it to be a perfect reflection of every single person's level fitness. That doesn't make a joke. Are you familiar with the concept of standard deviation? Also, I'm not sure where you're going with the pant size comment. You could have an average size waist but be fat in other areas. Every person is different. Link to post Share on other sites
mo mo Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 BMI is an approximation (just like IQ tests, SATs, and other standardized forms of testing/measuring). You can't expect it to be a perfect reflection of every single person's level fitness. That doesn't make a joke. Are you familiar with the concept of standard deviation? Also, I'm not sure where you're going with the pant size comment. You could have an average size waist but be fat in other areas. Every person is different. Except I'm not fat in other areas. Size L shirts fit me perfectly, XL is way too big for me. Comparing BMI to SATs or IQ tests is sill by the way. Yea, there's a standard deviation with those tests (for instance, depending on the test or the time of day, or my mood, I can score anywhere between 120-140 on an IQ test) but I wouldn't consider the problems with BMI a standard deviation at all. In fact, it isn't even an approximation of anything. It doesn't factor in muscle mass (which most people know that muscle is much heavier and denser than fat) and bone density. BMI isn't approximating anything, it's a useless statistic. Link to post Share on other sites
oaks Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 And this is why BMI is a joke. I weigh a whole 70lbs more than you. We are the same height. I am only one pant size bigger than you. What the hell is the point of BMI anyway if there is so much fail involved? So, are you fat? Or do you just have lots of muscle? It's a scale that doesn't work well for athletes (I think (american) football players have already been mentioned) who tend to have an over-abundance of muscle, but then those people represent only a small portion of the population for their age so they are far from typical. (Too much muscle isn't natural, either, but I don't think it's linked to health problems in the same way as too much fat.) For more typical people, BMI can be a good guide to whether a person is overweight or not, but since it's just a chart that says "more weight for your height equals fatter" then of course it's not going to be perfect. Oh, and since I don't think I've posted to this thread before, I'm somewhere over 6ft tall, in my late 30s, with a BMI of between 19 and 21 depending on how much cake I eat. ie, tall and slim. My inside leg measurement, mother's maiden name, and all the other details you'll need to steal my identity are written on a post-it note hidden under the wrist-rest of my keyboard. Link to post Share on other sites
rafallus Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 (edited) It's a scale that doesn't work well for athletes (I think (american) football players have already been mentioned) who tend to have an over-abundance of muscle, but then those people represent only a small portion of the population for their age so they are far from typical. (Too much muscle isn't natural, either, but I don't think it's linked to health problems in the same way as too much fat.)You don't have to be an athlete to have wonky BMI. I've been hitting the gym on much more average, non-professional basis, and measured BMI of nearly overweight, with BF of 11.4% at the time. BTW too little fat isn't healthy either. Now I'm around 75 kg, 175 cm (should be about 150 lbs, 5'10'' in your lovely imperial measurements). Edited July 15, 2011 by rafallus Link to post Share on other sites
oaks Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 You don't have to be an athlete to have wonky BMI. True, and I acknowledged this when I went on to say: but since it's just a chart that says "more weight for your height equals fatter" then of course it's not going to be perfect. I've been hitting the gym on much more average, non-professional basis, and measured BMI of nearly overweight, with BF of 11.4% at the time. Ok, so by "nearly overweight" I assume you mean "normal weight", which is what the category below "overweight" is usually called. What's the problem? Link to post Share on other sites
Bullet Proof Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 I am 21. 5'6" 120 lbs Size 2/Small. Link to post Share on other sites
USMCHokie Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 Male 27 5'8" 160 lbs 30" I'm a f*cking Adonis. :laugh: Link to post Share on other sites
snug.bunny Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 My statistical data, is shown here -----> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/217/pic562.jpg/ In a perfect world, I would like to be a few years younger, a few pounds lighter, and a few inches taller. Link to post Share on other sites
nyc_guy2003 Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 My statistical data, is shown here -----> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/217/pic562.jpg/ Not bad at all. Link to post Share on other sites
TheyCallMeBruce Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Male, 6'1", 220lbs, 36inW. I'm pretty stocky; very broad shoulders and thick legs. Link to post Share on other sites
fitgirl Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 female 21, 5'10.5'' without heels, 144 lbs, very into fitness Link to post Share on other sites
Dorie Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Female, 29, 4' 11", 7 stone. Link to post Share on other sites
nyc_guy2003 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 female 21, 5'10.5'' without heels, 144 lbs, very into fitness One of the more impressive stat lines I've seen so far. Link to post Share on other sites
whichwayisup Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 I'm brand new to these forums, but after reading through several threads, I'm just trying to figure out how representative these people are of the average population. I've seen a lot of men and women refer to women who are, say 5'2, 130lbs as "thick" or big, when to me, as a woman quite a bit larger, that seems like a normal, even ideal frame. Size 12 seems to conjure the word obesity more often than not. I know everyone has different tastes, and I always try to account for that when participating in online forums in general, but this particular site is really making me take a hit on self-esteem. I'm sincerely hoping that the general population on here is younger and fitter than average because otherwise, I'm in bigger trouble than I thought. Anyway, I'll start: 33 5'5" 168lbs 12/14 3 feet tall, can breathe through my ears, have no teeth and can do some pretty cool tongue tricks.. Just being a smart ass here.. Link to post Share on other sites
LittleTiger Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 One of the more impressive stat lines I've seen so far. Because......? Link to post Share on other sites
nyc_guy2003 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Because......? Pretty self-explanatory. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts