Jump to content

Do Men Have the Right to Trade in Their Aging Wives for Younger Ones?


Recommended Posts

The questions and threads on LS never cease to amaze me....

 

What kind of a question is that? Its their choice who they decide who they want to be in a relationship with just as its the woman's choice

 

Generally most marital relationships are formed between a more financially secure older man and a beautiful younger woman. I think at face value, this is a fair arrangement because women want a man who can be the main provider of the family while men want a woman who is youthful and beautiful.

 

Most relationships are formed based on that? I guess all the married couples out there who are experiencing financial hardships and debt out the ying yang and the wife is passable at best missed the memo

 

However, unlike money, beauty can only fade rather than grow along with time..

 

 

:confused:

lol unlike money? As fast as it comes it can go. You could be in the money today and broke next year...

Edited by StoneCold
Link to post
Share on other sites

Huh, sure, okay. I guess we could make it such that all young women should get with old, financially successful men, and when the women grow old, they should be relegated to the young, not-financially-established young males like yourself. Whatever makes you happy, I guess. *shrugs*

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ddeepprreesseedd
Huh, sure, okay. I guess we could make it such that all young women should get with old, financially successful men, and when the women grow old, they should be relegated to the young, not-financially-established young males like yourself.

 

hahahahahahahahaha...golden:)

Link to post
Share on other sites
OnyxSnowfall

IF two people agreed to marry under those generic and isolated terms and they do not genuinely fall in love with one another (at some point during their marriage [before the "beauty" fades lol])... then.............

 

I suppose the woman in said scenario is rather asking for it... =x

but he will likely have to pay for it, and she's probably fine with that...

Link to post
Share on other sites
frozensprouts

Therefore, I think it is also fair for men who remain successful over the course of their marriages to want to trade their wives once they have aged and no longer living up to their bargain for younger and more beautiful women.

 

 

ha ha ha ha ....

 

makes me think of when my husband and I went car shopping and we were looking at one of the new cars. The sales guy saw us looking, came bounding up to us asking " what can i do to get you in this new car right now!"...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another blatant **** stirring post by a **** stirring OP who doesn't even have a wife let alone a GF. Why would he even need advise on this subject?

 

He doesn't, he is just so bitter he can't go a day without trying to be as insulting to women as possible. Its probably the closest thing to a relationship he will ever have - insulting random women from behind a keyboard.

Link to post
Share on other sites
That's funny you say this because that is exactly what I was thinking! The guy can't even get a date, yet he's starting a thread with all these opinions on relationships. Funny shyte! Yet, somehow sad.

 

I know right? Talk about getting the cart ahead of the horse! Shouldn't he at least AT THE VERY LEAST, be capable of getting a woman to tolerate him for a few dates before he starts talking about how marriage does, doesn't should and shouldn't work?

 

Its like priests giving advise on family planning......:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any couple, when entering marriage, is encouraged to be honest about their vision of the partnership and their expectations for the future.

 

If you both agree the reasons you marry are that 1) you have a young hot thing on your arm with the expectation that once she ages you'll be trading her and 2) that in exchange she gets a financial free ride then, by all means, proceed.

 

I know you have yet to find your next car - uh I mean wife, but I wish you both the most happiness for the (short) duration of your marriage.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just another blatant **** stirring post by a **** stirring OP who doesn't even have a wife let alone a GF. Why would he even need advise on this subject?

 

He doesn't, he is just so bitter he can't go a day without trying to be as insulting to women as possible. Its probably the closest thing to a relationship he will ever have - insulting random women from behind a keyboard.

 

The funniest thing is that he's terribly paranoid about a woman 'leeching off all his money', when he has neither woman nor money. That boggles me so much that I've not yet managed to find an answer for it. :p

Link to post
Share on other sites
The funniest thing is that he's terribly paranoid about a woman 'leeching off all his money', when he has neither woman nor money. That boggles me so much that I've not yet managed to find an answer for it. :p

 

And it makes me wonder if he tries to claim both situations are intentional? Like he stays poor so as to not have the ladies on his jock or he stays single because his jock is so poor and he doesn't want them to find out? :eek:;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Generally most marital relationships are formed between a more financially secure older man and a beautiful younger woman. I think at face value, this is a fair arrangement because women want a man who can be the main provider of the family while men want a woman who is youthful and beautiful.

 

However, unlike money, beauty can only fade rather than grow along with time.

 

Therefore, I think it is also fair for men who remain successful over the course of their marriages to want to trade their wives once they have aged and no longer living up to their bargain for younger and more beautiful women.

 

My ex-husband found me too old to be intimate with, said my desires for marital sex were "repulsive and unnatural" we are now divorced, he's got a playmate 22 yrs younger than I am, I'm court ordered to pay him $2,750 in alimony for the rest of my life. What do I have? a couple of cats and and the pleasure of prowling craig's list looking for men I can pay to sex me up occasionally

Edited by soserious1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no justice in this world sometimes. If there is a hell, he'll have a special corner in it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
My ex-husband found me too old to be intimate with, said my desires for marital sex were "repulsive and unnatural" we are now divorced, he's got a playmate 22 yrs younger than I am, I'm court ordered to pay him $2,750 in alimony for the rest of my life. What do I have? a couple of cats and and the pleasure of prowling craig's list looking for men I can pay to sex me up occasionally

 

I'm pretty sure telling Musemaji this will only arouse and entertain him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Responding strictly to the OP, I've seen evidence of this in both directions, one from my own marriage when my wife traded me in as I could not provide in the manner she desired and/or became accustomed to, as well as real world observances of men 'trading in' their wives for younger versions. I think it works both ways, and well. Such is life.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure telling Musemaji this will only arouse and entertain him.

 

Well at least then somebody would be getting some entertainment out of my situation as I'm certainly not!

Link to post
Share on other sites
ladydesigner

I guess a woman can say the same thing. What if her H starts balding, gets a belly, and can't get his winkie dinkie up anymore. Does she get to trade him in for a younger, better looking and well... better functioning man?

 

This thread is too funny:lmao:

Link to post
Share on other sites
And it makes me wonder if he tries to claim both situations are intentional? Like he stays poor so as to not have the ladies on his jock or he stays single because his jock is so poor and he doesn't want them to find out? :eek:;)

 

 

 

I think he stays single because he's afraid of a hypothetical woman leeching off all his hypothetical money in the hypothetical future... :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
John Michael Kane
That's funny you say this because that is exactly what I was thinking! The guy can't even get a date, yet he's starting a thread with all these opinions on relationships. Funny shyte! Yet, somehow sad.

 

Anyone can get a date.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone can get a date.

 

Don't want to burst your bubble, but when you pay them I don't think you can really call it a date.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author
My ex-husband found me too old to be intimate with, said my desires for marital sex were "repulsive and unnatural" we are now divorced, he's got a playmate 22 yrs younger than I am, I'm court ordered to pay him $2,750 in alimony for the rest of my life. What do I have? a couple of cats and and the pleasure of prowling craig's list looking for men I can pay to sex me up occasionally

I dont know if you are joking. But if you are serious then that man disgusts me. People who initiate divorce should not be eligible for alimony. Maybe a little money but definitely not half of all assets.

 

I guess a woman can say the same thing. What if her H starts balding, gets a belly, and can't get his winkie dinkie up anymore. Does she get to trade him in for a younger, better looking and well... better functioning man?

Yes if she is richer than him and if he married her because she was more successful than himself. Edited by musemaj11
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author
Don't want to burst your bubble, but when you pay them I don't think you can really call it a date.

Lol, most women won't even go on a date with you if you dont pay. Unless you are saying all women are hookers. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author
Do you live in LA or some other location where people are so materially focused? :confused:

I do live in SoCal! :)

 

I'm almost certain a hooker would have been cheaper than my wife. ;)
Then I rest my case. :)
Link to post
Share on other sites
Generally most marital relationships are formed between a more financially secure older man and a beautiful younger woman. I think at face value, this is a fair arrangement because women want a man who can be the main provider of the family while men want a woman who is youthful and beautiful.

 

However, unlike money, beauty can only fade rather than grow along with time.

 

Therefore, I think it is also fair for men who remain successful over the course of their marriages to want to trade their wives once they have aged and no longer living up to their bargain for younger and more beautiful women.

 

I also think it's fair for an older woman to trade her impotent (ED) husband for a fit, younger man.

Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...