Jump to content

He's More Than MM


Recommended Posts

It's really sad that people actually settle and lower their standards to giving titles that only apply and exist in ones imagination. This goes out to all the WOMEN here (and the few MEN, which are very very few) that entertain such R. No pun intended... but there are 4 little boxes in an application which MM/MW/BF/GF/OW/OM are exactly not optional. I guess the whole entire universe got it all wrong.:lmao:

 

For that man to REALLY be your BF- he would have to be able to fill in the "SINGLE" box, unfortunately if he's ever been married he only gets to pick one of the other 3. You get the drill...

 

You can call him/her whatever you want, sweetpea. Let society, government, heck! even his church handle the other titles because you are right, he is more than a MM. :)

 

Ludicrous!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, I was talking about a nickname. I was reading some threads, and I thought calling the person you love MM or AP was very generic. Antiseptic. I thought perhaps there was a rule that the accepted acronym must be used.

 

Word! Did you mean SEPTIC though? There is nothing clean or neat about sleeping with 2 woman or being M and having an A. Just saying... I'm sure JP doesn't sleep with his demented boring W though.

 

I don't get your view though. You find it icky labeling your man a "MM" but you're ok with him being M and cheating with you? Which one comes first? The acronym or his status? One needs to be handled to void the other. That's all.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites
StrongerThanB4
Word! Did you mean SEPTIC though? There is nothing clean or neat about sleeping with 2 woman or being M and having an A. Just saying... I'm sure JP doesn't sleep with his demented boring W though.

 

I don't get your view though. You find it icky labeling your man a "MM" but you're ok with him being M and cheating with you? Which one comes first? The acronym or his status? One needs to be handled to void the other. That's all.:)

 

 

AMEN Sista! :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, it seems to me you've lost^...

 

"You've been served" (please somebody tell me where this reference is from)...

 

But I'm sure this thread had a point...

 

ON TOPIC: My suggestion is you could take your postS about your special mate (I do believe he's that special to you, or at least you think he is) in some other subforum, just hiding some delicate details because if in this subforum one is not understood, forget about the rest of them when the scope is so different from this:

 

Support and discussion for those who find themselves involved with a committed partner

 

(It doesn't say insulting, degrading, demeaning, takings jabs at, making fun of, etc. those who find themselves involved in an A)

 

No comment..:rolleyes:

Edited by TurningTables
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Support and discussion for those who find themselves involved with a committed partner

 

I believe it's implied that the discussion can occur independently from the support.

 

(It doesn't say insulting, degrading, demeaning, takings jabs at, making fun of, etc. those who find themselves involved in an A)

 

Also, it doesn't say insulting, degrading, demeaning, taking jabs at, making fun of , etc. those who find themselves involved in an A in the role of the B/S.

 

Does it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't be surprised when a "new" member with the identical use of language shows up soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I won't be surprised when a "new" member with the identical use of language shows up soon.

 

 

And PJ is her "sweetheart" if ya know what I mean. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...