Have men become spineless in approaching women?

[Wolf18]

So, you "blame" capitalists, communists, and gay people for the existence of feminism?

 

That's novel.

 

Why are you "blaming" at all?

 

 

Because for years, feminism was a fringe movement composed of mostly open Bolsheviks, yet now it has come to define American culture This could only be if a variety of segments of society are getting something from their support of this idiotic cause.

[dasein]

I think she's trying to say that if you want to learn about feminism, you have to get your information from feminist sources. Just like you would, naturally, turn to the Nazi ministry of propaganda if you wanted to learn about fascism (since we are on the subject of Nazi analogies...)

 

Haha, indeed. Perhaps she will steer us in the "proper" direction, Huffington Post, NYT, Jezebel, the NOW home page, EEOC white papers, other "unbiased" sources of information about feminism.

[dasein]

Why are you "blaming" at all?

 

When a bomb goes off, kills people, destroys lives, creates extreme social unrest, people tend to want to know who lobbed the bomb and why.

[dasein]

Because for years, feminism was a fringe movement composed of mostly open Bolsheviks, yet now it has come to define American culture This could only be if a variety of segments of society are getting something from their support of this idiotic cause.

 

This transformation from bolshevik to wall street is one of the more insidious truths of modern feminism, and revolves around a consumption economy's realization that women's expenditure on herself will generally grow to match her means in a greater proportion than a man's will. A woman, enriched by transfer payments from men, will spend spend spend more and more generally, while a man will not. A woman with cash may spend up to $10,000 per month on beauty, clothes, shoes food, etc. Very few men will spend at this level. To paraphrase Chris Rock, "If men could live in a cardboard box and still get women, they would," which is admittedly hyperbolic, but contains the truth within.

 

Women are the primary drivers behind the busted up "McMansion" industry, the home furnishings industry, foodie industry, jewelry industry, restaurant industry, make 90% of purchasing decisions even a very high percentage of car purchase decisions which would seem counterintuitive, as car ads are some of the only ads left that are regularly targeted at men. Women will spend more on their children, toys, games videos, than most men will. Yes, there are exceptions, frugal women and spendthrift men, but they are generally outliers.

 

So it's no wonder feminism has become so important to consumerist capitalism, women by and large tend to be addicted to consumerist luxury to a vastly greater degree than men are. Get the highest % of money in women's hands via extortionate domestic courts, guilting men into feeling oppressive and opening their wallets >>> profit. Who cares about men? They won't buy $5 a can cat food!

 

How is this topical? How does this affect men approaching women? Well one huge way is that men are OPTING OUT of a feminist skewed social system. Thankfully, feminism made the mistake of telling women they had to seek sex and f-ck like men or be sexually unfulfilled beings. Men don't have to approach that much, just get in shape and rake in the attention, or make a happy life alone where one gets to keep one's own money.

[Shaun-Dro]

This transformation from bolshevik to wall street is one of the more insidious truths of modern feminism, and revolves around a consumption economy's realization that women's expenditure on herself will generally grow to match her means in a greater proportion than a man's will. A woman, enriched by transfer payments from men, will spend spend spend more and more generally, while a man will not. A woman with cash may spend up to $10,000 per month on beauty, clothes, shoes food, etc. Very few men will spend at this level. To paraphrase Chris Rock, "If men could live in a cardboard box and still get women, they would," which is admittedly hyperbolic, but contains the truth within.

 

Women are the primary drivers behind the busted up "McMansion" industry, the home furnishings industry, foodie industry, jewelry industry, restaurant industry, make 90% of purchasing decisions even a very high percentage of car purchase decisions which would seem counterintuitive, as car ads are some of the only ads left that are regularly targeted at men. Women will spend more on their children, toys, games videos, than most men will. Yes, there are exceptions, frugal women and spendthrift men, but they are generally outliers.

 

So it's no wonder feminism has become so important to consumerist capitalism, women by and large tend to be addicted to consumerist luxury to a vastly greater degree than men are. Get the highest % of money in women's hands via extortionate domestic courts, guilting men into feeling oppressive and opening their wallets >>> profit. Who cares about men? They won't buy $5 a can cat food!

 

How is this topical? How does this affect men approaching women? Well one huge way is that men are OPTING OUT of a feminist skewed social system. Thankfully, feminism made the mistake of telling women they had to seek sex and f-ck like men or be sexually unfulfilled beings. Men don't have to approach that much, just get in shape and rake in the attention, or make a happy life alone where one gets to keep one's own money.

 

I really enjoyed reading your posts. Nothing sweeter than the truth and to hear that from me is huge! Feminism has been nothing but destructive and although I never gripped such a degree of knowledge on the subject, I'm dead against it in every way, shape, and form. The damage is in front us and you don't need college education to understand that.

 

And a lot of men today are waking up to the fact that they don't need a woman to be complete. Sure, we get those physiological urges every now and again, but there are more than one way to skin the lovely cat.

[joystickd]

I think it's a grand idea that people do research on their own, especially since its obvious that so many of the posters here who inject hollow, unsubstantiated feminist dogma into threads have utterly no idea what feminism really is, and how brutally destructive feminism has been in our society.

 

The link, which I notice you don't want to talk about (I don't blame you), is not -my- pov, but that of a pioneering social activist, an incredibly brave woman, braver than I could ever be, who despite death threats against her and her family, having her dog killed, endless insults and bullying by feminists, went out and made a difference in the world by creating something noble and good for all.

 

This type of social activism is the type we should all practice, free of polarizing victimization and hatred, emphasizing cooperation among all people as opposed to finger-pointing and gender-baiting. Yet what is her reward? Obscurity is her reward because she refused to politicize her social activism, refused to vilify men, refused to abandon her belief that the family structure is a healthy choice for women... refused to become a feminist. Her books, reflective of her work and experience in the first women's shelters, are hidden away, boycotted, unknown because she refused to tow the party line.

 

If there were some wholesome variant of feminism that wasn't simply a grotesque of the rule of law, it would glorify Erin Pizzey and her work. If the mild, fabricated "women's equality" version of feminism-lite you are all so fond of hopping back and forth to and from even existed, Erin Pizzey would be a veritable household name, wealthy from book sales, speaking engagements and television appearances. If feminism weren't a hollow, politicized, leftist lie in its entirety, you wouldn't need me to tell you who she is.

 

Admittedly I only recently found out who she is based on research into MRM/MRA after being fallaciously tagged with those acronyms unduly here on LS. So thanks to taramere for encouraging me to do some research on my own to learn more about dismissive labels applied to my posts here instead of reasoned response to the things I actually post.

 

Oh, and lurkers, note that when you tell the truth about feminism, the best response they have is to compare you to Herman Goering and antisemites. It's all they got!

 

I have to say you are really skilled at destroying these arguments women put up here about feminism. I usually get on here to just look every once and a while say some crazy stuff. It usually pisses the women off but I will say you and a few other guys on here really make these "enlightened" women look like idiots. Oh yeah! I read an article by Alice Walker's daughter. Alice Walker, a feminist, wrote The Color Purple. A book and movie which I hate because of its depiction of black men. Her daughter wrote about how she stopped speaking to her because she wanted a family. The article talks about how she was never really a mother to her daughter. It brings up one fact about feminists I see all the time. They look down on women that do traditional female roles like being a stay at home mom. I have even seen it with female posters on here. They have such a disdain for women that have families and take on traditional roles. Then these same women gripe about not being able to find a man.

[Woggle]

I notice that Hollywood loves movies that trash black men. The Color Purple and Waiting to Exhale come to mind.

[Emilia]

I think it's a grand idea that people do research on their own, especially since its obvious that so many of the posters here who inject hollow, unsubstantiated feminist dogma into threads have utterly no idea what feminism really is, and how brutally destructive feminism has been in our society.

 

The link, which I notice you don't want to talk about (I don't blame you), is not -my- pov, but that of a pioneering social activist, an incredibly brave woman, braver than I could ever be, who despite death threats against her and her family, having her dog killed, endless insults and bullying by feminists, went out and made a difference in the world by creating something noble and good for all.

 

This type of social activism is the type we should all practice, free of polarizing victimization and hatred, emphasizing cooperation among all people as opposed to finger-pointing and gender-baiting. Yet what is her reward? Obscurity is her reward because she refused to politicize her social activism, refused to vilify men, refused to abandon her belief that the family structure is a healthy choice for women... refused to become a feminist. Her books, reflective of her work and experience in the first women's shelters, are hidden away, boycotted, unknown because she refused to tow the party line.

 

If there were some wholesome variant of feminism that wasn't simply a grotesque of the rule of law, it would glorify Erin Pizzey and her work. If the mild, fabricated "women's equality" version of feminism-lite you are all so fond of hopping back and forth to and from even existed, Erin Pizzey would be a veritable household name, wealthy from book sales, speaking engagements and television appearances. If feminism weren't a hollow, politicized, leftist lie in its entirety, you wouldn't need me to tell you who she is.

 

Admittedly I only recently found out who she is based on research into MRM/MRA after being fallaciously tagged with those acronyms unduly here on LS. So thanks to taramere for encouraging me to do some research on my own to learn more about dismissive labels applied to my posts here instead of reasoned response to the things I actually post.

 

Oh, and lurkers, note that when you tell the truth about feminism, the best response they have is to compare you to Herman Goering and antisemites. It's all they got!

 

your posts crack me up. All this anger! Hilarious. Can't imagine it helps your dating life much though.

[dasein]

your posts crack me up. All this anger! Hilarious. Can't imagine it helps your dating life much though.

 

Yeah, I do find being lied to and stolen from for 50 years angering. Not surprised you find such amusing. My dating life is whatever I want it to be whenever I want it to be, and my views on feminism don't affect it. I screen the feminists out very very quickly, which is not a great loss in dating pool as all of them are ugly anyway... inside and out.

[Feelsgoodman]

your posts crack me up. All this anger! Hilarious. Can't imagine it helps your dating life much though.

Your post cracks me up You've got nothing intelligent to say in response to the other poster, so you resort to an ad hominem attack...and not even a remotely witty one at that. You must be a lot of fun to hang out with...

[Shaun-Dro]

Seeing what's going on and how women are carrying themselves, I feel like it's not a loss to skip approaching them. I'm really not so sure when I'll get back into the dating game. It feels like a gender war out here.