Why does American news ignore the Gary McKinnon case?

[M30USA]

Oh! Ok, so then Gary McKinnon is really an alien! And he was just searching for information about his homeland!

 

 

M30, you know I'm just playing! I had never, ever heard these theories before, and I would rather consider any idea out there at least, rather than remain the ignorant fool I am

 

I know you're playing. But honestly that's where lots of the misunderstanding about this theory comes from. If we know that all modern humans (except one specific race) have 1-3% Neanderthal DNA, what if there is a small trace of the ET gene remaining in us? The Bible says, "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days [before the flood]--and also afterwards--when the sons of God [ie, angels] came into the daughters of men and had children by them..." So what if the "and also afterwards" part is still around to this very day? And, yes, what if there is some genetic reason why these people are more likely to look towards the stars? There is a fictional representation of this in Star Wars, where young boy Anakin (Darth Vader), who had no earthly father, started questioning people about space. He even asked Padme Amadala what angels are! I'm telling you these writers for movies like that KNOW these myths and the Bible.

[M30USA]

Oh and by the way, to add another bullet to my list (#9), did you know there are numerous Native American myths about the "red hair people" who were said to dwell in their lands long ago? They were described in the journals of Buffalo Bill Cody as being tall, red-headed and so strong and fast that they could run alongside Buffalo.

[M30USA]

You've just summed up my own frustrations in dealing with M30, and why I can no longer seriously engage him on any topic. Trust me, it's for the best.

 

You are on a forum with 95% either non-Christians or non-bible lieralists where you're in the majority and its safe for you--of course you're going to say that.

 

So word up...

Edited October 30, 2012 by M30USA

[M30USA]

Anyone ever hear about this? (Of course not, it completely shatters everything "science" tells us--if it's true):

 

YouTube

 

(If you don't watch the ENTIRE video, don't bother.)

Edited October 30, 2012 by M30USA

[serial muse]

Anyone ever hear about this? (Of course not, it completely shatters everything "science" tells us--if it's true):

 

YouTube

 

(If you don't watch the ENTIRE video, don't bother.)

 

Well, I watched it, because what the heck while I'm home for another day while they sort out the hurricane damage at work.

 

I think "science" is going to be fine.

 

M30, you must know that they have long since found both an X and a Y chromosome in this kid. That is incontrovertible evidence that one of each type of human parent was involved in its conception.

 

As for the extended bit about "no significant similarity found", which Pye claims means that nothing in NIH's vast databases looked ANYTHING like this!!!1! Well, that's not what that error message means. It's a standard error message that comes up when the sample is too degraded to analyze.

 

I suspect you already know these arguments, which are already abundantly out there. But since you're beating a dead horse, I'm grabbing a stick too.

[M30USA]

Well, I watched it, because what the heck while I'm home for another day while they sort out the hurricane damage at work.

 

I think "science" is going to be fine.

 

M30, you must know that they have long since found both an X and a Y chromosome in this kid. That is incontrovertible evidence that one of each type of human parent was involved in its conception.

 

As for the extended bit about "no significant similarity found", which Pye claims means that nothing in NIH's vast databases looked ANYTHING like this!!!1! Well, that's not what that error message means. It's a standard error message that comes up when the sample is too degraded to analyze.

 

I suspect you already know these arguments, which are already abundantly out there. But since you're beating a dead horse, I'm grabbing a stick too.

 

But just stepping back, why the odd-shaped skull? It looks like a freaking gray alien or one of those guys in 1950s scifi movies!

[M30USA]

Well, I watched it, because what the heck while I'm home for another day while they sort out the hurricane damage at work.

 

I think "science" is going to be fine.

 

M30, you must know that they have long since found both an X and a Y chromosome in this kid. That is incontrovertible evidence that one of each type of human parent was involved in its conception.

 

As for the extended bit about "no significant similarity found", which Pye claims means that nothing in NIH's vast databases looked ANYTHING like this!!!1! Well, that's not what that error message means. It's a standard error message that comes up when the sample is too degraded to analyze.

 

I suspect you already know these arguments, which are already abundantly out there. But since you're beating a dead horse, I'm grabbing a stick too.

 

Thought you might be interested in this video. It addresses the following alternate explanations: hydrocephaly, cradle boarding, cranial binding, and progeria...

 

Edited November 1, 2012 by M30USA

[M30USA]

FYI, this skull will soon have its entire genome mapped. Even though the 6 previous DNA tests done on it so far are pretty solid and reliable, the genome will be the highest form of proof you can get. But, if the final genome does come back in a consistent manner as the 6 previous DNA tests (showing that it is 50% human and its father was non-human), there will still be naysayers who will come up with another claim.