Bible Verses: Fill-In-The-Blank

[M30USA]

GOOGLING STRICTLY PROHIBITED!

 

"Look! He is coming in the clouds. Every eye will see him, even those who pierced him, and all the tribes of the earth will _______ because of him. So be it! Amen." (Rev 1:7)

 

a) mourn

b) be afraid

c) rejoice

d) sing praises

[Toddbt12y1]

A) Mourn.

 

Also, depends on version.

[M30USA]

Yea, it's either mourn or wail. Definitely a negative connotation word. The only problem I have is with The New Living Translation, which translates it as "mourns for", thereby making it seem as if his arrival is welcomed. All the other translations clearly show otherwise--not just by the phrase, itself, but by the context of the subsequent sentence.

[M30USA]

Note: for future guesses, it might be best to write "My guess is __." That way it's not spoiled for everyone.

[TheFinalWord]

(Isa. 8:1) The LORD said to me, "Take a large scroll and write on it with an ordinary pen:

 

A) Berodachbaladan

B) Merodachbaladan

C) Tilgathpilneser

D) Zaphnathpaaneah

E) Mahershalalhashbaz

 

[TheFinalWord]

Okay, that one is pretty tough. But the answer provides an interesting bible fact

 

Here is another one...

 

"Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is ____." (1 John 4)

 

A) Holy

B) Great

C) Love

D) Perfect

E) Merciful

[M30USA]

(Isa. 8:1) The LORD said to me, "Take a large scroll and write on it with an ordinary pen:

 

A) Berodachbaladan

B) Merodachbaladan

C) Tilgathpilneser

D) Zaphnathpaaneah

E) Mahershalalhashbaz

 

 

Gosh, this is a complete guess just based on what SOUNDS most Biblical:

 

D?

[M30USA]

Okay, that one is pretty tough. But the answer provides an interesting bible fact

 

Here is another one...

 

"Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is ____." (1 John 4)

 

A) Holy

B) Great

C) Love

D) Perfect

E) Merciful

 

My guess is C.

[pie2]

(Isa. 8:1) The LORD said to me, "Take a large scroll and write on it with an ordinary pen:

 

A) Berodachbaladan

B) Merodachbaladan

C) Tilgathpilneser

D) Zaphnathpaaneah

E) Mahershalalhashbaz

 

 

 

 

What?

 

[M30USA]

It's a real verse. I checked it out.

[pie2]

Acts 12:13-14

 

Peter knocked at the outer entrance, and a servant named Rhoda came to answer the door. When she recognized Peter's voice, she was so overjoyed_ _.

 

a) she cried out in amazement!

b) she ran back without opening the door.

c) she gathered the disciples together.

d) she fell to her knees in thankful prayer.

[Toddbt12y1]

Acts 12:13-14

 

Peter knocked at the outer entrance, and a servant named Rhoda came to answer the door. When she recognized Peter's voice, she was so overjoyed_ _.

 

a) she cried out in amazement!

b) she ran back without opening the door.

c) she gathered the disciples together.

d) she fell to her knees in thankful prayer.

 

My guess is B...but what do I know?

[TheFinalWord]

haha it's the longest name in the bible (some say Ish. 9:6 is the longest name if you take the trans-literal interpretation)

 

If you want to know how to pronounce, here is the MP3...(the first time I heard this I was like, what? And I repeated the track like 12 times until I could say it lol, yes I'm a nerd like that )

 

Mahershalalhashbaz, it means "He has made haste to the plunder!"

 

Playing Isaiah 8 by Alexander Scourby - picosong

[pie2]

My guess is B...but what do I know?

 

 

Todd, you know a lot about the bible! Yes...B is right

 

It makes me laugh, because I'd probably do that .

[TheFinalWord]

Acts 12:13-14

 

Peter knocked at the outer entrance, and a servant named Rhoda came to answer the door. When she recognized Peter's voice, she was so overjoyed_ _.

 

a) she cried out in amazement!

b) she ran back without opening the door.

c) she gathered the disciples together.

d) she fell to her knees in thankful prayer.

 

My guess is B??...she was amazed Peter was not in the jail

[Toddbt12y1]

Todd, you know a lot about the bible! Yes...B is right

 

It makes me laugh, because I'd probably do that .

 

Well I have studied the KJB cover to cover, about six times in a row, in just two years, not counting the past. Usually im better at finding verses then memory. My speciality is prophecy tho.

 

I can ask an interesting question, but it's off topic.

 

Where there cities on Earth, before mankind? It's in the book of Jeremiah

 

Freebie: the book of Jeremiah we all have(any translation) is a copy of a copy of a copy. The original was destroyed in fire, the second in water...granted...off topic

[pie2]

My guess is B??...she was amazed Peter was not in the jail

 

Yep...I love the whole chapter!

[M30USA]

GOOGLING STRICTLY PROHIBITED!

 

"Look! He is coming in the clouds. Every eye will see him, even those who pierced him, and all the tribes of the earth will _______ because of him. So be it! Amen." (Rev 1:7)

 

a) mourn

b) be afraid

c) rejoice

d) sing praises

 

Quoting my own post, lol.

 

I consider this verse to be highly theologically significant. Why? Because many people carry this idea that, deep down, everybody really loves God but we just kind of get mixed up in the mess. But this verse paints a totally different picture. Jesus, our savior and creator, will return to earth and be received with...what? Mourning? Not joy and relief? Think about that.

[pie2]

Well I have studied the KJB cover to cover, about six times in a row, in just two years, not counting the past. Usually im better at finding verses then memory. My speciality is prophecy tho.

 

I can ask an interesting question, but it's off topic.

 

Where there cities on Earth, before mankind? It's in the book of Jeremiah

 

Freebie: the book of Jeremiah we all have(any translation) is a copy of a copy of a copy. The original was destroyed in fire, the second in water...granted...off topic

 

I have no clue...is this a trick question ?

 

[M30USA]

Where there cities on Earth, before mankind? It's in the book of Jeremiah

 

You CAN make a Biblical case for the presence of life on earth long before Adam--even human life. There is no specification as to the elapsed time between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. If you consider that Adam and Eve were told to "repopulate" the earth, when it seemingly hadn't even been populated, you start to wonder. There is also another verse in one of the major prophets which hints that God refreshes and recreates the face of the earth.

 

My own theory is that God might have "tweaked" something in the DNA and spirit of a human-like animal to bring about modern man (Adam). If I am wrong here, it doesn't mean the Bible is wrong. It's just my own theory. There are two contradictory ideas at play in science: 1) Human life has been around for a LONG, LONG time--longer than most creationists like to admit, but 2) Modern life (as we know it) with art, government, science, and great intellect has only been around for a few thousand years and appears to have literally sprung out of nowhere 6,000-10,000 years ago. How do you reconcile these two truths? By considering that, while evolution as a whole is false and a lie, it might contain a partial truth that God "tweaked" modern man (starting with Adam) from animals. This is a theory that I am currently looking into to see if it lines up with the Bible and science. Any criticism from either side is welcomed.

[Toddbt12y1]

Well, as much as our own belief plays out: As a christian, the bible is one's authority.

 

It actually says, that He(God), created the first man(Adam), from the "dust of the Earth." This would defer any evolution tweaking. As well: We do know that humans have been around for a very long time, yet, we do not exactly know when Adam was around(no time was ever truly given).

 

This is the Answer: Yes cities existed. But for Lucifer and his angels, whom where tenders of Earth. It is found in Jeremiah, and backed up in Jude.

 

I can site evidence: I.e. scripture if you wish: I just don't know it off the top of my head.

 

Nonetheless: It is found in Jeremiah, backed up by Jude.

[M30USA]

Well, as much as our own belief plays out: As a christian, the bible is one's authority.

 

It actually says, that He(God), created the first man(Adam), from the "dust of the Earth." This would defer any evolution tweaking. As well: We do know that humans have been around for a very long time, yet, we do not exactly know when Adam was around(no time was ever truly given).

 

This is the Answer: Yes cities existed. But for Lucifer and his angels, whom where tenders of Earth. It is found in Jeremiah, and backed up in Jude.

 

I can site evidence: I.e. scripture if you wish: I just don't know it off the top of my head.

 

Nonetheless: It is found in Jeremiah, backed up by Jude.

 

Yes, Dr. Tony Evans has spoken on this. He said the earth was Satans. I'm aware of the angel presence on earth prior to man. However you're going to run into resistance from even CHRISTIANS on this. It begs the question of what happened to them. And if you say God disembodied them into mere spirits you are forced to get into the whole Genesis 6 Nephilim debate. Good luck.

[Toddbt12y1]

Not at all. Plus, I am capable of defeating the Sons of God debate.

 

That is drawing something very different to what I was implying. Whoever said, that these spirits needed a flesh body to dwell in a house? These houses could even be spirit based.

 

As of the sons of God and daughters of men debate: Use scripture linking. The sons of Seth(himself included) followed God and were called "Sons of God." Which anyone who follows God is His son. The daughters of men(mostlikely came from adam or Seth's brother Cain). They did not follow God, thus, called man.

 

Now: Giants? Just because there are giant Nepehilim so called, doesn't mean they came from Angels. Angels do not reproduce, as Biblical evidence suggests. Nor do demons(fallen angels).

 

 

Oh, as of the cities? God utterly destroyed them, during Lucifer's rebellion.

[M30USA]

Not at all. Plus, I am capable of defeating the Sons of God debate.

 

That is drawing something very different to what I was implying. Whoever said, that these spirits needed a flesh body to dwell in a house? These houses could even be spirit based.

 

As of the sons of God and daughters of men debate: Use scripture linking. The sons of Seth(himself included) followed God and were called "Sons of God." Which anyone who follows God is His son. The daughters of men(mostlikely came from adam or Seth's brother Cain). They did not follow God, thus, called man.

 

Now: Giants? Just because there are giant Nepehilim so called, doesn't mean they came from Angels. Angels do not reproduce, as Biblical evidence suggests. Nor do demons(fallen angels).

 

 

Oh, as of the cities? God utterly destroyed them, during Lucifer's rebellion.

 

 

Todd, more than any subject probably in the entire Bible I have studied the sons of God subject. I could honestly speak off the cuff for 60 minutes on this subject alone. When I have time I will show you that there is no debate. You can prove it grammatically from the Hebrew alone. Plus the line of Seth view was not the original view and didn't even show up until 450 AD. I will get back to you because this subject requires a lot of time. If you honestly want to know, we can discuss this in PM.

[Toddbt12y1]

I have studied the whole Bible extremely intently.

 

You could argue that point, and I could argue one too: Jesus Himself said we'd be like the angels, neither marrying nor partaking in marriage. That implies a lot. You seem frustrated. It is good to study one thing, it shows a keen interest in it. However, there is plenty more in the Bible to show otherwise as well.

 

I know when a person is frustrated: That's usually when they say my name, lol. I am positive a spirit cannot reproduce. You could use said spirit entering a body, then reproducing. Yet, it wouldn't be the spirit's children.

 

I already know well what you believe on this subject, and you probably can see where I stand. I highly doubt any one of us is about to convince the other. Besides, these giants where destroyed by God, in the Wars of the Lord. As well as by Israel later.