JustJoe Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Apparently she is so special that she is universally loved whilst I am seen by those around me as damaged and easy. Well according to JJ's PMs when I questioned him on his attitude to me.Yes, Anne, she IS special and so are you, Snookums. Link to post Share on other sites
JustJoe Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I don't think your damaged. I think you are an asset to this community.I would agree with this 1,000%, but Anne wouldn't believe me. Link to post Share on other sites
anne1707 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Anne, I've tried and tried to explain that I NEVER MEANT YOU, PERSONALLY. So if you are going to continue to have a case of the cobbles about it, Phooey on yooey. I KNOW you didn't mean it personally. I have never said you did. My point was that you think men think xyz about WS like me but they think abc about your wife. I just asked you why men would think I was damaged but they (please note THEY not YOU) would not think that way about your wife. I would agree with this 1,000%, but Anne wouldn't believe me Ah Joe you tried to be funny. Bless. Link to post Share on other sites
cocorico Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 LOL, perfect Joe, you did not take the bait of the slam on being "just a school teacher" as opposed to a university professor....as a "school teacher" I picked up on the subtle slam that we are not part of academia.... It wasn't a diss of schoolteachers. It was simply pointing out that the institutional culture of academia (not academies) is very different to that of schools. A previous poster commented on the culture in academia favouring discretion. Someone employed in a school then commented that, as a member of "academia" that was not the case. Well, no, it's not the case that the institutional climate of academia and schools are the same. Anyone who read anything other than that into the post is guilty of their own projection, sorry. Link to post Share on other sites
Got it Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Her cheating or not cheating really doesn't have anything to do with JJ. I read it as she did the hard work so she won't cheat again. What this means is it goes counter to what I have been told by others and what has been espoused that once a cheater always a cheater and that there is really no redemptions especially for those that did not stay and do the hard work by reconciling. It actually has nothing to do with Joe. Link to post Share on other sites
JustJoe Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 I KNOW you didn't mean it personally. I have never said you did. My point was that you think men think xyz about WS like me but they think abc about your wife. I just asked you why men would think I was damaged but they (please note THEY not YOU) would not think that way about your wife. Ah Joe you tried to be funny. Bless. Jeez, Louise, so now you are telling me what I think? I think this and I think that, according to you? WOW!! Link to post Share on other sites
JustJoe Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 I KNOW you didn't mean it personally. I have never said you did. My point was that you think men think xyz about WS like me but they think abc about your wife. I just asked you why men would think I was damaged but they (please note THEY not YOU) would not think that way about your wife. Ah Joe you tried to be funny. Bless. Hey , I'm the life of the party. I kept the Taliban in stitches for two solid years. then they kept ME in stitches for 10 months in the Hospital. Just shows that you have to know when to close your act. Link to post Share on other sites
JustJoe Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 What this means is it goes counter to what I have been told by others and what has been espoused that once a cheater always a cheater and that there is really no redemptions especially for those that did not stay and do the hard work by reconciling. It actually has nothing to do with Joe. Shucks , Ma...I didn't do nuthin! Link to post Share on other sites
Quiet Storm Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) It wasn't a diss of schoolteachers. It was simply pointing out that the institutional culture of academia (not academies) is very different to that of schools. A previous poster commented on the culture in academia favouring discretion. Someone employed in a school then commented that, as a member of "academia" that was not the case. Well, no, it's not the case that the institutional climate of academia and schools are the same. Anyone who read anything other than that into the post is guilty of their own projection, sorry. I am not a teacher. So I have no skin in the game. No projections here. It seemed like a total "dis" to me. You know it. We all know it. Sugarcoating now wont help. Edited August 23, 2013 by Quiet Storm 6 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts