This lady is a prophetess in my book

[M30USA]

Has he been identified ? Curious.

 

All the news reports say her name is Dianne Reidy, a longtime stenographer for the House, but you can clearly hear the House staff call her "Holly" in the audio. Either that is one of her nicknames or there is something fishy going on.

[2sure]

All the news reports say her name is Dianne Reidy, a longtime stenographer for the House, but you can clearly hear the House staff call her "Holly" in the audio. Either that is one of her nicknames or there is something fishy going on.

 

I mean The man in the video, she talks to him. Who is he?

[pureinheart]

Wow...wow...

 

This story has a LOT more than initially meets the eye:

 

 

You know what M30, I saw this and was disappointed with how Megyn Kelly reported it seeing that the sound didn't change when Diane was being pulled off the podium, and your link is the same except it's Bret Baier...then started investigating a bit and found some sources stating they called her "Molly" (yours "Holly")...then saw the elevator scene from another video...I got confused and just stopped searching.

 

Now in one FOX report I clearly remember them saying Diane asked if the mic was still on- that could have been what the exchange with that man was about?

 

I was disappointed in Megyn's report because she called it a rant and other such things.

 

It does appear that Diane is proclaiming something at the podium based on her body language ... wonder if she was proclaiming judgment? Why would it need to be removed...the event was definitely altered...big time.

[pureinheart]

All the news reports say her name is Dianne Reidy, a longtime stenographer for the House, but you can clearly hear the House staff call her "Holly" in the audio. Either that is one of her nicknames or there is something fishy going on.

 

I heard 2 different reports- one saying she worked there 8 yrs and another 20.

 

Now I'm really curious...was it just FOX or all of them.

[M30USA]

You know what M30, I saw this and was disappointed with how Megyn Kelly reported it seeing that the sound didn't change when Diane was being pulled off the podium, and your link is the same except it's Bret Baier...then started investigating a bit and found some sources stating they called her "Molly" (yours "Holly")...then saw the elevator scene from another video...I got confused and just stopped searching.

 

Now in one FOX report I clearly remember them saying Diane asked if the mic was still on- that could have been what the exchange with that man was about?

 

I was disappointed in Megyn's report because she called it a rant and other such things.

 

It does appear that Diane is proclaiming something at the podium based on her body language ... wonder if she was proclaiming judgment? Why would it need to be removed...the event was definitely altered...big time.

 

The man who was speaking to her while she was sitting at her typewriter (before going up to the podium) immediately went to text on his phone when she started to head up to speak. It's strange how he didn't even look at her go up there. It's almost as if he knew exactly what she was going to do. If he did, then perhaps the audio clip from the lobby area (outside House) occurred BEFORE and he was warning security about what was about to happen? Just a guess.

Edited October 21, 2013 by M30USA

[pureinheart]

Ok, the mic clearly wasn't on. I'm still searching, but whoever dubbed that wasn't into detail or they would have taken out the elevator ding.

 

Now FOX purposefully plays two versions...one with her sound and one without ...why not just leave out the one without sound. ALSO they didn't show her walking to the "dias" as they call it as during last nights search I saw that portion and was reminded of what Pie had said about Dianne's message being broken, and thought this portion did show "authority" per se in her walk...someone referred to it as "robotic".

 

Concerning her husband, I remember FOX saying during first reports that seemed that he didn't agree with her "rant" by stating that she isn't normally like that or something. Then saw M30's article saying he was proud of her.

 

It seems to me like they should be able to find out what she said up there...not real difficult given today's technology.

[pureinheart]

The man who was speaking to her while she was sitting at her typewriter (before going up to the podium) immediately went to text on his phone when she started to head up to speak. It's strange how he didn't even look at her go up there. It's almost as if he knew exactly what she was going to do. If he did, then perhaps the audio clip from the lobby area (outside House) occurred BEFORE and he was warning security about what was about to happen? Just a guess.

 

This makes sense. It felt like he was snitching when first watching your link.

 

Well, all of them were in on it. Why? What did she say that they don't want us to hear?

Edited October 21, 2013 by pureinheart

[M30USA]

The fact that it has been NIGHTTIME when she's been getting these messages from the Holy Spirit seems to be consistent with Scripture:

 

 

"For God does speak—now one way, now another— though no one perceives it. In a dream, in a vision of the night, when deep sleep falls on people as they slumber in their beds, he may speak in their ears and terrify them with warnings..." (Job 33:14-16 NIV)

 

(Did you hear that? God TERRIFY them? Then such people will walk into a church only to hear the pastor talk about how, if God had truly spoken, there would be no spirit of fear. Total bull.)

Edited October 21, 2013 by M30USA

[pureinheart]

The fact that it has been NIGHTTIME when she's been getting these messages from the Holy Spirit seems to be consistent with Scripture:

 

 

"For God does speak—now one way, now another— though no one perceives it. In a dream, in a vision of the night, when deep sleep falls on people as they slumber in their beds, he may speak in their ears and terrify them with warnings..." (Job 33:14-16 NIV)

 

(Did you hear that? God TERRIFY them? Then such people will walk into a church only to hear the pastor talk about how, if God had truly spoken, there would be no spirit of fear. Total bull.)

 

I'd like to cite Jonah. God told him to do something, he didn't want to, look what happened- terrifying if you ask me.

 

Sometimes what God shows us is terrifying. I've been there, and have had to confront certain things that aren't happy, happy, joy, joy. They were serious matters. There are times when God will say, ok fine, someone else will get the blessing...and then there's those other times when He say's, nope you're going to do it.

 

This was right after the vote ending the shutdown. There's never a word out of time. What was so significant about this particular event (shutdown)...

[M30USA]

I've probably watched the video of Dianne Reidy over 50 times. Gosh, she should be the Woman of the Year. Even if you aren't a believer, she still was the voice of what so many Americans wish they could shout out at our government.

[pureinheart]

I mean The man in the video, she talks to him. Who is he?

 

I heard Jim Costa...

[pureinheart]

I've probably watched the video of Dianne Reidy over 50 times. Gosh, she should be the Woman of the Year. Even if you aren't a believer, she still was the voice of what so many Americans wish they could shout out at our government.

 

I agree. I've watched it quite a bit and investigated to get a feel of what "people" out there are saying- quite interesting. I still wonder what she said though. There were people around her and must have heard at the very least a portion of what she said...not.a.peep.anywhere

[pureinheart]

M30, thinking I get it. In order to be a Christian nation, that nation would have to coincide with Gods laws. Now at certain points in history we might have or either came very close. I would say slavery and abortion are clear disqualifiers because both slavery and abortion are/were laws of the land, or in better terms both were declared legal denying personhood giving power to one to do with as they will with another.

 

Slave owners had Bibles and went to church. I watched a movie awhile back about slavery. I think most of the slave owners even took their slaves to church possibly requiring it. Now either the slaves had the idea that slavery was of God because either the church taught it, or they assumed it was a given due to slavery being condoned, I would say the latter is true. One of the little girls managed education and learned to read. She somehow got a hold of a Bible discovering that slavery was not of God- she got caught reading the Bible by the slave owner, she then rebuked his hypocrisy. The movie was quite compelling.

 

We could really use another Abraham Lincoln.

 

This is very hard M30, really hard...

Edited October 24, 2013 by pureinheart

[M30USA]

Slavery is a tough issue. As always, let's scrap what society thinks--even what the church thinks. Let's ONLY consider Scripture.

 

What we cannot escape from is the fact that slavery existed in the Bible. Here are 3 examples that come to mind:

 

1) Israel owned foreign slaves. The Law did not prohibit slavery but it did require that slaves be released after 6 years (on the 7th year).

 

2) Israel, themselves, were slaves to the Babylonians and Egyptians. God set them free from captivity after a period of time. It's evident from Scripture that in both cases God determined when they became slaves and when they were freed.

 

3) The descendants of Ham, son of Noah, were cursed by God and prophecied to be the slaves of his brothers.

 

Christians don't like to admit that God, himself, ordered slavery. However, this is NOT the same as saying slavery is okay for us. A good analogy is killing/murder. God commands us not to kill; yet he himself kills. He sent an angel to kill 185,000 Assyrian soldiers as they slept. Obviously God can do this because he, unlike us, knows all things and is the only capable judge. In our limited knowledge, we can never kill with justice.

 

The same thing applies to slavery. God does not want us to keep slaves. I personally would never own a slave and I do believe it's wrong. But God clearly uses slavery for his grand purpose--as wrong as that seems to us. Before anyone knee-jerks and calls God unfair, I will remind you that God sent his own nation (Israel) into slavery. In addition, the whole world has been subjected in slavery to Satan, also by the plan of God.

 

It could very well be, in my opinion, that God uses rebellious people to have slaves so that other rebellious people may become enslaved in the hope of being turned to repentance. True, not all slaves seem like they deserve it. But sometimes God's plan covers multiple generations and it's not just about single individuals.

 

That's my opinion based on Bible study. Slavery is evil. But God (not us) is free to use evil for good.

Edited October 24, 2013 by M30USA

[pureinheart]

Slavery is a tough issue. As always, let's scrap what society thinks--even what the church thinks. Let's ONLY consider Scripture.

 

What we cannot escape from is the fact that slavery existed in the Bible. Here are 3 examples that come to mind:

 

1) Israel owned foreign slaves. The Law did not prohibit slavery but it did require that slaves be released after 6 years (on the 7th year).

 

2) Israel, themselves, were slaves to the Babylonians and Egyptians. God set them free from captivity after a period of time. It's evident from Scripture that in both cases God determined when they became slaves and when they were freed.

 

3) The descendants of Ham, son of Noah, were cursed by God and prophecied to be the slaves of his brothers.

 

Christians don't like to admit that God, himself, ordered slavery. However, this is NOT the same as saying slavery is okay for us. A good analogy is killing/murder. God commands us not to kill; yet he himself kills. He sent an angel to kill 185,000 Assyrian soldiers as they slept. Obviously God can do this because he, unlike us, knows all things and is the only capable judge. In our limited knowledge, we can never kill with justice.

 

The same thing applies to slavery. God does not want us to keep slaves. I personally would never own a slave and I do believe it's wrong. But God clearly uses slavery for his grand purpose--as wrong as that seems to us. Before anyone knee-jerks and calls God unfair, I will remind you that God sent his own nation (Israel) into slavery. In addition, the whole world has been subjected in slavery to Satan, also by the plan of God.

 

It could very well be, in my opinion, that God uses rebellious people to have slaves so that other rebellious people may become enslaved in the hope of being turned to repentance. True, not all slaves seem like they deserve it. But sometimes God's plan covers multiple generations and it's not just about single individuals.

 

That's my opinion based on Bible study. Slavery is evil. But God (not us) is free to use evil for good.

 

I love how you explained this, and the understanding that I get from this is Gods ways are not ours and that it's not about this life, it's about salvation.

 

You are the first person that I've ever heard (and this was in another thread also) either answer or pull out the fact that some things God does does not make sense. I've always felt there was or had to be some profound answer that I hadn't discovered...but the simple fact is, we don't know, but we do know that God is perfect.

 

I can't remember the thread, although the words you used put all of the frustration and unanswered questions over the years completely to rest- now that is God. Some of my issues with this was pride, feeling like I had to have an answer for everything, like God needs me to defend Him or something.

 

See, this is the power of God, you and others giving a message or speaking a word that answers questions and ultimately changing a persons life forever...I have to wonder how many lives Dianne changed by her obedience also. Had you not started this thread I would have missed this- thank you Jesus.

Edited October 25, 2013 by pureinheart

[M30USA]

I love how you explained this, and the understanding that I get from this is Gods ways are not ours and that it's not about this life, it's about salvation.

 

You are the first person that I've ever heard (and this was in another thread also) either answer or pull out the fact that some things God does does not make sense. I've always felt there was or had to be some profound answer that I hadn't discovered...but the simple fact is, we don't know, but we do know that God is perfect.

 

I can't remember the thread, although the words you used put all of the frustration and unanswered questions over the years completely to rest- now that is God. Some of my issues with this was pride, feeling like I had to have an answer for everything, like God needs me to defend Him or something.

 

See, this is the power of God, you and others giving a message or speaking a word that answers questions and ultimately changing a persons life forever...I have to wonder how many lives Dianne changed by her obedience also. Had you not started this thread I would have missed this- thank you Jesus.

 

That's totally true. And, remember, God can basically do anything he wants because he is God. Even if he does something horrific and unjust--which he won't do because he isn't those things. But even if he DID do those things, he can, and we have no right to stand as his judge.

[pie2]

Was John the Baptist keeping "order" when, while people were lining up for his baptism ceremony, he said to the Pharisees, "You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?"

 

Ok, I must say that I would have expected some sort of statement from Ms. Reidy by now. Had this been a pressing message from God she wanted to get out to the American people, she could have had a major platform from the media.

 

Though I think the discussion in itself isn't a bad thing...she definitely had people talking. At least we had to think a little about God and the direction of our country, even if only for a moment...

[M30USA]

Ok, I must say that I would have expected some sort of statement from Ms. Reidy by now. Had this been a pressing message from God she wanted to get out to the American people, she could have had a major platform from the media.

 

Though I think the discussion in itself isn't a bad thing...she definitely had people talking. At least we had to think a little about God and the direction of our country, even if only for a moment...

 

What kind of "platform" would you expect? Remember, Jesus had no political platform. He merely spoke the truth wherever he walked. People made him famous; he actually avoided fame and power, oftentimes escaping away into the forest or mountain. It's interesting how many times in the Gospels Jesus either "slips away" or "escaped" or even so far as "hid" from the crowd.

[pie2]

What kind of "platform" would you expect? Remember, Jesus had no political platform. He merely spoke the truth wherever he walked. People made him famous; he actually avoided fame and power, oftentimes escaping away into the forest or mountain. It's interesting how many times in the Gospels Jesus either "slips away" or "escaped" or even so far as "hid" from the crowd.

 

This woman isn't Jesus, and this isn't 2000+ years ago. Many people in the bible made proclamations about God in public settings. Our public setting today is through modern media. If she has a message, I would expect her to clarify her message to the public.

[M30USA]

Husband (and pastor) of Dianne Reidy speaks at length to radio host and reveals some detailed info:

 

Dan Reidy husband of Diane Reidy, the House Stenographer Speaks Out! - YouTube

[M30USA]

Hmm...

 

After having posted this above link, I have doubts about its authenticity. Listen to it if you want, but I don't want to endorse it as legit. Sorry.

[pureinheart]

M30, why do you question this link? Do think it's "staged" per se?

[M30USA]

M30, why do you question this link? Do think it's "staged" per se?

 

I don't think they identified their radio station. Also, the "husband" seemed to have trouble giving specific information. Anybody can look up that she went to school on Long Island, or that she worked for X amount of years at House.

[pureinheart]

I don't think they identified their radio station. Also, the "husband" seemed to have trouble giving specific information. Anybody can look up that she went to school on Long Island, or that she worked for X amount of years at House.

 

What I noticed is the same narrative as MSM, that she was at the Dias when the words were spoken. They weren't, it's obvious. Also this wasn't questioned as far as I remember.

[happydate]

Well you do. Please read the book written by Dr. Shakuntala Modi titled Remarkable Healings. I had been helped by people in the psychiatric field who adopted her techniques and been awakened because of that.

 

You are not alone. What you are experiencing is with your various past lives as a Shamanic healer. Perhaps when you were a healer then, you had some unresolved psychological imbalances plus demonic possessions due to when you perform your spiritual healing in past lives that are affecting you in the presence as a form of mental illness.

 

Blessings..

Edited December 28, 2013 by a LoveShack.org Moderator