irc333 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Saw this profile of an "addendum" of a woman...she added 3 things where...if you're NOT 3 of those things, don't email her. For one, the obvious...if you're looking for a booty call 2nd, "Don't call me 'honey', or 'hottie'". 3rd...."I wear heels, (shes only 5'4") and if I'm taller than you in heels, sorry, but it won't work". Now, wouldn't you say it's asking too much if a woman is only 5'4", but if she's wearing 4" heels, she's 5'8"? I sent off my email to her, just to see if she even responds by asking her, "So how tall ARE you in heels, if you wore them, would you be taller than me even though your'e only ...realistically...5'4"?" Is it pretty superficial to include your heels along with your height as your standards in dating? 1 Link to post Share on other sites
anne1707 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 I have to ask this. Do you ever see a profile that you do not find fault with? 17 Link to post Share on other sites
SunnySide0418 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 I disagree. She wants what she wants. I also always wear heels and prefer someone taller even when I'm wearing heels. At the very least the same height. We want what we want and it doesn't make her shallow because of it. Just move on ... 2 Link to post Share on other sites
TAV Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 I have to ask this. Do you ever see a profile that you do not find fault with? I think he is writing an thesis about online dating profiles and is planning to graduate on it 3 Link to post Share on other sites
CaliGypsy Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Perhaps, she's had a lot of guys complain when she wears them ? Link to post Share on other sites
Under The Radar Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 I think Robert Schimmel said it best: That's like a guy saying, "My penis is 18 inches long ...... starting at the spleen". 7 Link to post Share on other sites
iris219 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 It's not superficial at all. It's honest. Why waste a man's time if he doesn't meet her criteria? If you're under her height requirement, don't email her. You take other people's OLD profiles way too personally. 5 Link to post Share on other sites
MidwestUSA Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 So, if you're 5'8", message her. If not, don't. It's actually pretty clear cut. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
TaraMaiden Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 I think he is writing an thesis about online dating profiles and is planning to graduate on it I give him a 2:4.... Link to post Share on other sites
PJKino Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Womens vanity and shallowness especially with old knows no bounds 1 Link to post Share on other sites
TaraMaiden Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 how is it vain and shallow? Are you telling me a woman who would prefer to date someone taller than she is, is vain and shallow? Why? 1 Link to post Share on other sites
PJKino Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 how is it vain and shallow? Are you telling me a woman who would prefer to date someone taller than she is, is vain and shallow? Why? Not just taller but has to be alot taller then her in large heels as if shoes are more important then finding a great match? 2 Link to post Share on other sites
TaraMaiden Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 You don't get it, do you? It works both ways: "I love wearing heels. I am of average height. This is how tall I am in heels. I may therefore end up being taller than you, in my heels." (Many men cite heels as making a woman look sexier). bear in mind that if she hesitates to date a guy who's shorter than she is, when she's in her heels - there are an awful lot of guys who EQUALLY don't enjoy dating a woman who seems taller than he is. Just to balance things out, I'm 4'10" and I can't wear heels at all, since breaking my back 12 years ago. So no bias here. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
somedude81 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Because she's a shallow bitch. I'm 5'6, and if a 5'4 woman turned me down because she'd be 5'7 in heels, she's fu*king retarded. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
TaraMaiden Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Some guys might like it, some may not. if you think it's retarded, it's no more retarded than a guy rejecting a woman because her hips are wider than her shoulders.... 7 Link to post Share on other sites
anne1707 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Because she's a shallow bitch. I'm 5'6, and if a 5'4 woman turned me down because she'd be 5'7 in heels, she's fu*king retarded. Is it any more shallow than a man who says he wants a short to average height girl with big boobs? 8 Link to post Share on other sites
somedude81 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Is it any more shallow than a man who says he wants a short to average height girl with big boobs? People who don't read properly Link to post Share on other sites
anne1707 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 People who don't read properly http://www.loveshack.org/forums/mind-body-soul/sexual-reproductive-health-practices/461153-i-love-short-average-height-women-big-boobs 3 Link to post Share on other sites
TaraMaiden Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 love-15..... 1 Link to post Share on other sites
SoleMate Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Why do women include their heels as PART of their natural height? Why do men (ok, 1 man) read one online post from 1 woman and then instantly generalize that behavior to all women? 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Taramere Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Not just taller but has to be alot taller then her in large heels as if shoes are more important then finding a great match? She has a preference for a man who's taller than 5 ft 8". For a 5 ft 4" woman, that seems like a fair enough preference. Around 5 ft 4 is average for a woman in the US. Around 5 ft 10" is average for a man. Human height - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia So a 5 ft 10" man would be her physical equivalent. I don't see what's wrong with a woman who's of average height preferring a man of average height. Link to post Share on other sites
somedude81 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 http://www.loveshack.org/forums/mind-body-soul/sexual-reproductive-health-practices/461153-i-love-short-average-height-women-big-boobs Yeah, where in that thread did I state that I would reject any woman who wasn't tall and or had small boobs? Go ahead, look over every single post I made and you won't find a single post where I say that I'd only date women that were short or had big boobs. In fact you'll find plenty of posts where I say that I would take tall women who have small boobs. She has a preference for a man who's taller than 5 ft 8". For a 5 ft 4" woman, that seems like a fair enough preference. Around 5 ft 4 is average for a woman in the US. Around 5 ft 10" is average for a man. Human height - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia So a 5 ft 10" man would be her physical equivalent. I don't see what's wrong with a woman who's of average height preferring a man of average height. The problem with the whole physical equivalent thing, is that who is going to date the short guys? Should I limit myself to women who are 5' or shorter? 1 Link to post Share on other sites
PJKino Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 She has a preference for a man who's taller than 5 ft 8". For a 5 ft 4" woman, that seems like a fair enough preference. Around 5 ft 4 is average for a woman in the US. Around 5 ft 10" is average for a man. Human height - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia So a 5 ft 10" man would be her physical equivalent. I don't see what's wrong with a woman who's of average height preferring a man of average height. I didnt realize dating was merely a staistical formula were people physically match up by a certain height i thought other factors were involved in attraction as well my mistake 1 Link to post Share on other sites
anne1707 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Yeah, where in that thread did I state that I would reject any woman who wasn't tall and or had small boobs? Go ahead, look over every single post I made and you won't find a single post where I say that I'd only date women that were short or had big boobs. In fact you'll find plenty of posts where I say that I would take tall women who have small boobs. The point is its a preference. She has one preference as do you. Simple as that so there was no need to call her a shallow b*tch. Should I limit myself to women who are 5' or shorter? So you don't like shorter women now. Or are women under 5' too short? That would be another preference then and would imply, following your logic, that very short women are not going to get dates either just like short men. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
PJKino Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 The point is its a preference. She has one preference as do you. Simple as that so there was no need to call her a shallow b*tch. So you don't like shorter women now. Or are women under 5' too short? That would be another preference then and would imply, following your logic, that very short women are not going to get dates either just like short men. Short women are usually the most vocal about their preference for tall men 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts