irc333 Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 There was a post on these forums where it was mentioned that a lot of men don't typically find Sarah Jessica Parker attractive, some think her down right ugly. Same with Tori Spelling. I figured it had something to do with the bone structure of her face. I recall one time when I was younger, I had a crush on Maria Shriver. lol. Apparently, some men found her to be ugly. A lot men actually. I couldn't figure out why, but one could say some of these women aren't "universally" attractive. This puts me in comparison of saying, "It doesn't take much for me to be attracted physically" to a woman. I suppose that's a good thing, as it allows me more options in dating? Link to post Share on other sites
PegNosePete Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 What's your question? Link to post Share on other sites
Author irc333 Posted October 30, 2014 Author Share Posted October 30, 2014 What's your question? Read the last paragraph. It has a question mark at the end of it. Link to post Share on other sites
somedude81 Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I had to Google Tori Spelling. She has a man face. Generally the reason why women are seen as unattractive is when they have masculine facial features. There a girl in one of my classes who has a very nice body but a masculine face and I just don't think she's attractive at all. I would say that most women who are not obese and have a feminine face are universally attractive. Link to post Share on other sites
Brooke02 Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 It's called Butterface. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
ThaWholigan Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 People find different things sexually attractive as individuals. We can all agree on someone being attractive by conventional standards, but we aren't all turned on by conventional things. Link to post Share on other sites
sillyanswer Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I suppose that's a good thing, as it allows me more options in dating? Statistically, yes. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
GemmaUK Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Statistically, yes. Agree but it will be dependent upon those women who you find attractive also finding you attractive. If there's a room with 200 women and 100 are universally attractive, the other 100 are non-universally attractive women you may be attracted to them all but only those attracted to you will want to date you. If there are equal numbers of universally and non-universally attractive men in the room as well then all of the men/women may be attracted to all of opposite gender(providing they are all heterosexual) but the likelyhood is that few will be mutually attracted. Link to post Share on other sites
xxoo Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Sarah Jessica Parker dated beautiful, young Robert Downey Jr. My goodness, what more evidence does she need of her beauty? But sure, your pool of women is only as big as your range of attraction. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
SteveC80 Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I think women actually have a much more universal attraction towards certain traits of men Men have a much more diverse type in what they find attractive. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts