fyrwyfe Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 The fact that he watched it doesn't necessarily mean that he's turned on by those images. [color=darkblue] He already admitted he likes this sort of thing...... [/color] He admits he likes it, and finds it appealing sexually. I said I thought it was disgusting, and asked if he always liked this kind of thing. He said he always looked but never participated. He might if given the chance because "it's just an animal." [color=darkblue] Poor animals. [/color] Link to post Share on other sites
JadeStar Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 I have seen those animal sites before and I have a feeling that half those people are so high on drugs they probably don't even know what they are doing. Then again theres probably some that do and like it. To each their own I guess, but anyway its still nasty! Like I said in my previous reply, my main concern would be the fact that he thinks its ok to watch children. Thats even worse than an animal in my book. Jade Link to post Share on other sites
corry42 Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 I'm someone who defended the husband in the scat-thread, but I'm not going to do the same thing here. Not because I think animal porn is sicker, but because of his apparent view on the whole thing. You can like any form of porn. Animal porn, bukkake, scat, bdsm, whatever... Most of the time you're just curious, or you just can't help what you like. But what's missing here is respect, consent and a certain form of sanity. If the husband really phrased his opinion as HolyCrow said he did, then there is indeed a problem. IMO, fantasies are okay as long as it doesn't affect the way you think or act in real life. But the husband here seems to have lost touch with reality, he seems to think it's perfectly okay to f*ck people (and animals) without their consent (the "can animals consent" question is a whole new problem). The phrase "it's just an animal" is especially worrying, because it shows that he sees the objects of his desire as exactly that, as objects. That's not very healthy, I think. And even if he didn't phrase it like that, even if he knows that there's no way without respect and consent, I still don't think divorce is a bad idea. As far as I can see, you're not going to settle for a conpromise, HolyCrow, so best end it here and find someone else. Better for the both of you. Also, good luck finding a man who doesn't have the occasional "sick" fantasy. It'll be a long journey, methinks. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts