I feel like my husband is incompetent

[Cephalopod]

He reminded me of my dad which at the time I definitely thought was a good thing! But my mum would call my dad spineless and when he was with her... he was.

 

I agree, I definitely need therapy.

 

 

 

Well there you go. You just answered your own mystery. You had a mum who disrespected your dad, and then you went out and married your dad...or a man just like him; and now you have become your mum.

 

 

Yeah. You need therapy badly. And you need to let your husband go.

[Cullenbohannon]

Therapy will not change what you like and what is compatible for you. The only wrong in this, is the affair and how you treat your husband. If deep in your gut, you know this man will never make you truly happy and satisfied, then so be it. That does not mean anything in you is broken.

 

And the same goes for your Husband. What is the point of all the bashing? Incompetent? So he isn't your superman. There is nothing wrong with him and the beta bashing from you and posters here are unwarranted.

 

Dont force this. Accept who you are. There is nothing here to fix. Show him your true gift of love. Accept your husband for the man he is and set him free.

[Just a Guy]

Hi Undercoverirish, I just noticed in the post where you quoted one of mine that you said your "Grandson' mentioned something. So how old are you actually? Where did your grandson come along from when your daughter is just three or four years old!:eek

[whichwayisup]

You seem to of married your dad. Congratulations

on not being your mom.

 

I'm forgetful. My wife knows better to not send

me to the store without a list.

 

Also you know your husband drops the ball.

So you know that on important things as food

you needed to check that he did his job. As

to packing his clothes, leave that on him if

he forgets his socks or anything.

 

You are who you are he is who he is.

 

I agree. Work around it and if you love him, he treats you well and is a good father then just try to accept he is who he is. Yes he can make more effort but he's scattered and forgetful. (off topic, might want to get a dr appt to have his memory checked just in case it's early onset of something more serious..just sayin'...better safe than sorry)

 

Anyway I feel for your frustration about doing a lot of the work packing etc, but hate to say it most men are like this. When we go away my husband packs for himself and I pack everything else. I actually don't mind because I know it'll be done right and nothing will be forgotten.

 

You can sit and talk to him about making more effort, be honest and tell him how it makes you feel when he is like that... But it seems that he can't help it and it's just who he is.

 

Are you considering ending your marriage over these issues?

[Undercoverirish]

Hi Undercoverirish, I just noticed in the post where you quoted one of mine that you said your "Grandson' mentioned something. So how old are you actually? Where did your grandson come along from when your daughter is just three or four years old!:eek

 

 

Argggggg typo!! ??

 

It should have read grandmother. I'm on my phone posting and sometimes I post weird words..

[Undercoverirish]

Hi Undercoverirish, I just noticed in the post where you quoted one of mine that you said your "Grandson' mentioned something. So how old are you actually? Where did your grandson come along from when your daughter is just three or four years old!:eek

 

And I'm 33 by the way

[Undercoverirish]

I agree. Work around it and if you love him, he treats you well and is a good father then just try to accept he is who he is. Yes he can make more effort but he's scattered and forgetful. (off topic, might want to get a dr appt to have his memory checked just in case it's early onset of something more serious..just sayin'...better safe than sorry)

 

Anyway I feel for your frustration about doing a lot of the work packing etc, but hate to say it most men are like this. When we go away my husband packs for himself and I pack everything else. I actually don't mind because I know it'll be done right and nothing will be forgotten.

 

You can sit and talk to him about making more effort, be honest and tell him how it makes you feel when he is like that... But it seems that he can't help it and it's just who he is.

 

Are you considering ending your marriage over these issues?

 

Yes I am. It's not just these issues, I've fallen out of love with my husband and I don't have any respect for him. The emotional distance has just been increasing and I don't think it will improve. Even when we speak about it, my husband just agrees to do whatever he think will make me happy.

[Just a Guy]

Hi Whichwayisup, I think the answer to your question at the end of your post is 'Yes'. The OP has given enough hints about that and is just biding her time I think till an opportune moment arises. Warm wishes.

[Els]

Ambitious people, most notably single parents, work full time, climb the promotion ladder, and are the primary caregivers of their children, too. These things aren't mutually exclusive.

 

Realistically, it is very uncommon for someone to be able to achieve a high-paying job and position while being the primary childcarer. Are there single parents who manage to do that? Yes, of course, a few. However, that is also a huge accomplishment, and an exception to the norm!

 

Also, this thread isn't about single parents. In a couple, it's generally expected that the overall load should be shared, thus it's patently unfair and unrealistic to expect one party (of either gender) to have a great career while being the primary childcarer. Do you ACTUALLY know any men who work in very high-earning positions while being the main carer for their child from babyhood? Because I don't. In fact, I don't know too many women who do that either (and the ones who do typically divorce because resentment grows over such an arrangement).

 

The OP is free to divorce him if she wants. Doesn't change the fact that it's a pretty ******* move (for a man/woman to marry someone, let them be the primary childcarer for 4 years, and then kick them out as soon as the kid reaches an age where the "babysitter" isn't required too much anymore), and doesn't change the fact that nothing in this thread has actually indicated that the man is being an unequal partner.

 

If he had been unambitious, low-earning, AND left all the childcare to her, I'd be on board with you guys, but not when he's the main carer.

[MJJean]

Hence, she really doesn't love her husband.

 

 

Comparing anyone isn't right. But this is what she does because she is t happy = this OP needs serious counseling.

 

The issue is with the OP even though the marriage may be mismatched. It's not right that the H doesn't even stand a chance while the OP views him in this way.

 

Comparing people is natural and normal. We do it all the time. We compare people against others when we date, select service personnel, select employees, friends, on and on. Life is competitive.

 

Of course the husband doesn't stand a chance. He's not the personality type the OP finds appealing. She is into more "alpha" males and he's a "beta".

 

Realistically, it is very uncommon for someone to be able to achieve a high-paying job and position while being the primary childcarer. Are there single parents who manage to do that? Yes, of course, a few. However, that is also a huge accomplishment, and an exception to the norm!

 

Also, this thread isn't about single parents. In a couple, it's generally expected that the overall load should be shared, thus it's patently unfair and unrealistic to expect one party (of either gender) to have a great career while being the primary childcarer. Do you ACTUALLY know any men who work in very high-earning positions while being the main carer for their child from babyhood? Because I don't. In fact, I don't know too many women who do that either (and the ones who do typically divorce because resentment grows over such an arrangement).

 

The OP is free to divorce him if she wants. Doesn't change the fact that it's a pretty ******* move (for a man/woman to marry someone, let them be the primary childcarer for 4 years, and then kick them out as soon as the kid reaches an age where the "babysitter" isn't required too much anymore), and doesn't change the fact that nothing in this thread has actually indicated that the man is being an unequal partner.

 

If he had been unambitious, low-earning, AND left all the childcare to her, I'd be on board with you guys, but not when he's the main carer.

 

Yes, I do know a few people in high paying careers who are primary childcarers due to death, divorce, or illness. The careers involved are in finance, medicine, and research chemistry. I also know a SAHD who homeschools 5 kids while his wife supports the family.

 

We can discuss fair and argue equality in domestic partnerships til we're both blue, but that doesn't change the fact that while this husband may be a nice guy, but he's not what the OP wants in a mate. What's she supposed to do? Stay married to a man she isn't in love with, isn't attracted to anymore, and doesn't respect due to his lack of ambition and the issues he seems to have "adulting" because he's nice enough, isn't too terribly inept, and is a good father?

[Cephalopod]

And I'm 33 by the way

 

 

 

You and your husband are both young enough to start over with compatible mates, or go forward separately with your lives. Don't wait another ten years and let this resentment fester any longer.

[Els]

 

Yes, I do know a few people in high paying careers who are primary childcarers due to death, divorce, or illness. The careers involved are in finance, medicine, and research chemistry. I also know a SAHD who homeschools 5 kids while his wife supports the family.

 

None of that fits the mold of "one person in a two-person relationship being high-earning and ambitious while doing most of the childcare since the baby was born", which is the standard that the OP's husband appears to be held to.

 

We can discuss fair and argue equality in domestic partnerships til we're both blue, but that doesn't change the fact that while this husband may be a nice guy, but he's not what the OP wants in a mate. What's she supposed to do? Stay married to a man she isn't in love with, isn't attracted to anymore, and doesn't respect due to his lack of ambition and the issues he seems to have "adulting" because he's nice enough, isn't too terribly inept, and is a good father?

Of course the OP can leave. We all seem to agree on that. The part we disagree on is where some posters are supporting the OP's perception of her husband as "incompetent" and "lazy". Dude just sounds like an unfortunate man who happened to marry a woman whom he was incompatible with in my view.

[DKT3]

None of that fits the mold of "one person in a two-person relationship being high-earning and ambitious while doing most of the childcare since the baby was born", which is the standard that the OP's husband appears to be held to.

 

Of course the OP can leave. We all seem to agree on that. The part we disagree on is where some posters are supporting the OP's perception of her husband as "incompetent" and "lazy". Dude just sounds like an unfortunate man who happened to marry a woman whom he was incompatible with in my view.

 

No, one who didn't/doesn't love or respect him. Being compatible is a myth because people change adjust and grow. What was an interest or desire at 25 may not or often isn't at 35.

[Els]

No, one who didn't/doesn't love or respect him. Being compatible is a myth because people change adjust and grow. What was an interest or desire at 25 may not or often isn't at 35.

 

Being compatible is not a myth - while changes can and do happen, you would be surprised how the core values of a person can often remain roughly the same throughout their adult life.

 

But yes, the OP doesn't respect or love him... AND is incompatible with him.

[Undercoverirish]

None of that fits the mold of "one person in a two-person relationship being high-earning and ambitious while doing most of the childcare since the baby was born", which is the standard that the OP's husband appears to be held to.

 

Of course the OP can leave. We all seem to agree on that. The part we disagree on is where some posters are supporting the OP's perception of her husband as "incompetent" and "lazy". Dude just sounds like an unfortunate man who happened to marry a woman whom he was incompatible with in my view.

 

I've never said he was lazy, he isn't.

 

There's quite a few people mentioning SAHD, my husband has never been a stay at home dad but he chose to reduce his working week to 4 days a week when she was first born. This was partially to do with the fact that he wanted to spend time with her... but mostly because he doesn't like working so it was a great excuse to reduce his working hours. He's often said that if we could afford it, he'd love to give up work and be a stay at home dad.

 

Since she was 8 weeks old, she's been in childcare 4 days and week and 1 day with hubs until she turned 3 and she went to kindergarten full time.

[Hecan]

You want, you think , you feel ....

 

You have a CHILD!!! One who is primarily cared for by your husband as You built a career!! Oh, but you don't need child care now ....

 

Well I hope HE gets the child as HE seems to be the parent. Sorry but welcome to reality!!

 

And your sweet child probably doesn't really care what daddy forgot on vacation, only that daddy is there !!!

Edited October 26, 2017 by Hecan
Addition

[Els]

I've never said he was lazy, he isn't.

 

There's quite a few people mentioning SAHD, my husband has never been a stay at home dad but he chose to reduce his working week to 4 days a week when she was first born. This was partially to do with the fact that he wanted to spend time with her... but mostly because he doesn't like working so it was a great excuse to reduce his working hours. He's often said that if we could afford it, he'd love to give up work and be a stay at home dad.

 

Since she was 8 weeks old, she's been in childcare 4 days and week and 1 day with hubs until she turned 3 and she went to kindergarten full time.

 

Out of curiosity, did you EVER spend even one full day looking after your child alone, when she was a baby? You sound like someone who has never taken care of a baby or toddler before and have zero idea how much work it entails. Staying at home with your baby or toddler is NOT a walk in the park! I have been in both situations (not my baby, a relative needed help 1 day) and working is easier, 100% hands down.

 

You sounds extremely dismissive of your husband's sacrifices; I feel very sorry for him and your child.

[elaine567]

I really struggled with the shock of motherhood. She wasn't planned although I did think I wanted to have a family with him.

I had very bad postnatal depression after having her and I think that along with the financial struggles have really taken a toll on our relationship.

^^^ this

Women who have had PND can struggle massively with bonding with their children.

[MJJean]

Staying at home with your baby or toddler is NOT a walk in the park! I have been in both situations (not my baby, a relative needed help 1 day) and working is easier, 100% hands down.

 

You sounds extremely dismissive of your husband's sacrifices; I feel very sorry for him and your child.

 

Except he's not a SAHD. OP clearly states he works and their child has been in daycare 4 days a week until she started school.

 

 

 

There's quite a few people mentioning SAHD, my husband has never been a stay at home dad but he chose to reduce his working week to 4 days a week when she was first born. This was partially to do with the fact that he wanted to spend time with her... but mostly because he doesn't like working so it was a great excuse to reduce his working hours. He's often said that if we could afford it, he'd love to give up work and be a stay at home dad.

 

Since she was 8 weeks old, she's been in childcare 4 days and week and 1 day with hubs until she turned 3 and she went to kindergarten full time.

 

I think the use of the term "primary carer" has confused people. Here, most folks define "primary carer" as a SAHP, so they assume he's SAHD when, in fact, he's not. At all.

[elaine567]

I think the use of the term "primary carer" has confused people. Here, most folks define "primary carer" as a SAHP, so they assume he's SAHD when, in fact, he's not. At all.

 

Yes, the child has always been in almost full time child care.

So whilst he is no doubt a good father in his way, he is not the 24/7 hands on saint that some on here would like to paint him as.

[camillalev]

You want, you think , you feel ....

 

You have a CHILD!!! One who is primarily cared for by your husband as You built a career!! Oh, but you don't need child care now ....

 

Well I hope HE gets the child as HE seems to be the parent. Sorry but welcome to reality!!

 

And your sweet child probably doesn't really care what daddy forgot on vacation, only that daddy is there !!!

 

Ok so the SAHP should always get the child in custody cases? Which in turn means mothers(usually the SAHP) should always get full custody of kids? Please It's amazing the applause men get just for being present.

 

Yes, the child has always been in almost full time child care.

So whilst he is no doubt a good father in his way, he is not the 24/7 hands on saint that some on here would like to paint him as.

 

Exactly. People are on here ranting about how he gave up so much to be STAP so she could build a career meanwhile no such thing has happened. OP has stated that the child is in child care 4 days a week and both parents work during this time.

 

Honestly the lengths some people will go just to lambaste this woman is amazing. Again ignoring post-natal depression which is a serious issue that often gets looked over with new mothers. And ignoring the fact that OPs husband hid debt from her and didnt do anything about until she made him get on a debt management plan.

[Hecan]

My rant is the ability for parents, any parent to be all about themselves and the child is an after thought. We know SHE makes more money , SHE packs She she she she ... My point is SHE appears to be all about herself and not much mention of her child. It seems to be an indication of where SHE is. Children don't care who makes more money, who has more ambition, who is depressed, if parents stay home all the time or not, they care about who greets them at the end of the day, who spends time, who thinks they are more important than climbing a ladder, they need to be made a priority. I never said stay at home parents are better than those that work but SHE has decided that the man who appears to be the same as he has always been suddenly isn't cutting it and SHE is ready to throw in the towel. I say go for it, but leave your child out of it. They don't deserve her. Oh and wait, SHE. Had feeling for a co-worker but that's over now...

 

Rant over!

[Els]

Except he's not a SAHD. OP clearly states he works and their child has been in daycare 4 days a week until she started school.

 

I think the use of the term "primary carer" has confused people. Here, most folks define "primary carer" as a SAHP, so they assume he's SAHD when, in fact, he's not. At all.

 

I was not assuming he was a permanent SAHD. When I mentioned him being at home, I was referring to the 1 day a week that he sacrificed at his job to stay at home with the child.

 

Also, daycare doesn't take the child 24/7. They usually take the child 8 hours a day tops (here, anyway). The other 16 hours a day, someone has to take care of the child. According to the OP's description, that "someone" has been her husband.

 

If you ask ANYONE of any gender who has been the primary childcarer for their young child EVEN with daycare, they will tell you that it will take a toll on your career. All that extra time spent on the child instead of advancing their career - it really adds up. Having to be home at 5pm to pick up the kid instead of being able to put in extra time at work. Spending your evenings taking care of the kid instead of networking or building up your skills. Not being able to go on business trips. Waking up nights with the kid. Waking up earlier to send the kid to kindergarten instead of just getting ready for work.

 

Most responsible high-flying parents in a LTR will acknowledge that if it weren't for their partner, they would never have been able to be where they are in their career while still being a parent. I really thought this was common knowledge - it certainly is in my career field.

Edited October 27, 2017 by Elswyth

[Timshel]

Holidays, sick days, calls from school nurses...teacher conferences, teacher planning days. Oh, those are mostly school age k-5 (age 5-10); pre-school/daycare, a single parent can do but there are limitations. Using the words no, I have to go and I can't take that trip/overtime are a reality.

 

I was fortunate that my career was flexible when my children were very young, but I remained local when I could have gone federal, even global.

My husband's career did advance because when daycare was closed, the children were sick and just plain old 5:30 pick up did not interfere, he was the captain of his work hours.

 

This truism regarding child care does not necessarily negate the OP's struggles with contentment in her marriage.

Op, have you tried marriage counseling yet? Sorry, if this has already been addressed.

 

If you truly want out of this marriage it would be better for all to do so, only know that juggling your work and social life will not be easier with a 50/50 child custody agreement.

[S2B]

That's a good point - when a call from school comes in - which parent leaves work to get the child...you or your husband?