Sparky Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 There's something that's been on my mind lately, and I'm asking the women, and guys can comment too, if you know... Where should/n't a man have hair on his body? Or where is the sexiest places? I know that this all depends on the generation, so I'm just asking for MY generation, so like, maybe 25 - 30 years or younger?. I'm 19 years old, and I live in Ontario, Canada. Obviously, the back hair is not sexy, and I've been hearing that chest hair nowadays is not very sexy either. So what about down in the groin area? Link to post Share on other sites
hugme Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 The less hair the better! I have no issues with leg, arm or underarm hair but I personally prefer body hair to be kept to minimal. In the pubic area I favour all nakie so no hair at all or at least have it trimmed. Link to post Share on other sites
Author Sparky Posted April 17, 2006 Author Share Posted April 17, 2006 Cool! Thanks hugme! Any more comments? One thing I forgot to mention is about circumcision. What do you girls think about that one? It not like I'm gonna go get myself circumcised for the women would like it! LOL! Link to post Share on other sites
Outcast Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 It's pointless to design yourself according to fashion; there is sufficient diversity in tastes (even at different ages) that you run the risk of doing something that would be a turn-off to someone who likes you. When you find yourself a gf, ask her her preference - and then decide if it's worth altering yourself to her taste. Link to post Share on other sites
bluetuesday Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 there's no objective 'sexy'. it has much more to do with a man being cool enough to not care too much about whether he has hair or not, or the wrong sort of hair, or in the wrong places. blah blah blah. if you feel self-conscious about your carpeted back, wax it for sure. but length, thickness, style, colour, quantity of pubes? gimme a break! i'd be surprised if i found any guy who fretted too much about these things sexy at all. also re: circumcision. what's the point in having a preference? i wouldn't make a decision on whether i liked a guy or not because of a flap of skin he may or may not have. is the foreskin (or not) attached to someone kind with a sense of humour? THAT'S more like it. but i am 33 and therefore out of 'your generation'. Link to post Share on other sites
catgirl1927 Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 I wasn't aware that I was of a different "generation" than people who are 30. That will be big news to my boyfriend, who is 30 and younger than me. Wow. Link to post Share on other sites
blind_otter Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 It's all about personal preference. I personally like chest hair. If I wanted to date a prepubescent boy I would. And then I would subsequently be convicted of molestation. But that's not the point. I like trimmed, well manicured body hair in the appropriate areas, chest, legs, surrounding the weenis in a gentle, soft nest. Link to post Share on other sites
Author Sparky Posted April 18, 2006 Author Share Posted April 18, 2006 Hey, thanks for all your input! It really helped. What I kinda meant by a different generation is like... I'm 19, so someone who's about 40 or so would probably be used to what people USED TO BE sexy, not the now. Do you get what I mean? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts