a4a Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 If "more attractive" means "looking better", perhaps men ain't as superficial as we tend to believe. If it is not only a matter of looks, well, what is attractive to one might be not attractive to someone else. and vice-versa. Everybody has his own preferences - take flies, they are so fond of sh*t. (I'm not exactly ladylike today) ehh I hang with many married and single guys....... a favorite or a version of one of their sayings is about different women in their view : "I'd F her if I can put a bag over her head" Link to post Share on other sites
newbby Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 From a man's point of view, though I have never cheated nor plan to cheat, I would imagine it is very much the respect thing - that is lack of respect. As in I just want to have my lance waxed and move on. I want it fast and easy and free. Why not hook up with the ugly drunk bitch? but it does make little sense though. if you had a partner who was attractive then why need someone else to wax your lance in the first place? or do most men have a sick desire to treat a woman like a slut from time to time? Link to post Share on other sites
a4a Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 All things considered, I doubt it. How much higher spiritual connection can you really have when you meet someone at a bar, when you're drunk, and all your interactions are limited to interactions that occur while inebriated? give me a break. what there is not a spiritual connection when getting blown in the parking lot by a fugly strange drunk woman that offered it? Link to post Share on other sites
newbby Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 Well at least it would seem more reasonable..... Pitt dumped Aniston for Jolie right? now if he started cheating on Jolie with Kathy Bates..... well ya just go..... wtf? or you might think well she must have a good personality Link to post Share on other sites
tanbark813 Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 Not me...... I don't cheat However I am very shallow so there is no way in hell I would cheat down if I were a cheater! I didn't say all women cheat. I said I've personally known of women to cheat down. Like many things on this board, it's not a gender-specific phenomenon. Link to post Share on other sites
newbby Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 All things considered, I doubt it. How much higher spiritual connection can you really have when you meet someone at a bar, when you're drunk, and all your interactions are limited to interactions that occur while inebriated? give me a break. you are talking about a specific type of cheating here... Link to post Share on other sites
Adunaphel Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 You're right. Men aren't as superficial as most women think. And looks are very subjective. For example, I'd call taking Jolie over Aniston a definate trade down. Can I have Angelina, then, if you'll throw her away? I would not mind getting your leftovers/stuff you do not want, really. Link to post Share on other sites
Adunaphel Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 ehh I hang with many married and single guys....... a favorite or a version of one of their sayings is about different women in their view : "I'd F her if I can put a bag over her head" I hear thet a lot from guys who were turned down by those women before they could get hold of the paper bag. Link to post Share on other sites
lindya Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 You're right. Men aren't as superficial as most women think. And looks are very subjective. For example, I'd call taking Jolie over Aniston a definate trade down. Now there's an interesting pairing. Jolie and Pitt, that is - not Jolie and Aniston (though arguably the latter would be even more interesting). In every photograph I've seen of the two of them, Angelina Jolie just seems to dwarf Brad Pitt with her presence. I think she's probably a very fascinating character...but not necessarily a very stable person to have as a partner. It seems like the sort of pairing that would go from white hot passion to miserable hell on earth in a very short period of time Link to post Share on other sites
tinktronik Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 you are talking about a specific type of cheating here... Who cares . Men cheat . Many men cheat down . I would assume cheating down is done because its easier to find than up Puzzy would be . An ugly woman , one who is needy or has low self-esteem as well is more likely to put up with being second fiddle. Link to post Share on other sites
blind_otter Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 or you might think well she must have a good personality Oh God I think I just wet myself. Link to post Share on other sites
Asafan Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 but it does make little sense though. if you had a partner who was attractive then why need someone else to wax your lance in the first place? or do most men have a sick desire to treat a woman like a slut from time to time? I guess it would depend on how much sex you were getting at home, the quality of that sex, how your relationship was, and (most importantly) the maturity level of the guy involved. But would you keep going back to get your knob polished or get grossed out eventually? If the sex was good, why not? That also depends on just how fat and ulgly we are talkin about here. There is the subjective thing to consider. Ugly to you might not be the same as ugly to someone else And to stoopid guy. NO WAY is taking Jolie over Aniston cheating down. She is WAY hotter, though admittedly not as classy. Link to post Share on other sites
tinktronik Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 Oh God I think I just wet myself. "bout it, bout it" ....I still don't know whay that meant .I think perhaps she was trying to start a physical confrontation with me , but really it could mean lets go get popsicles together . :lmao: good personality and trash all around her trailer. Link to post Share on other sites
lindya Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 ehh I hang with many married and single guys....... a favorite or a version of one of their sayings is about different women in their view : "I'd F her if I can put a bag over her head" I resent that comment! Link to post Share on other sites
hotgurl Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 If "more attractive" means "looking better", perhaps men ain't as superficial as we tend to believe. If it is not only a matter of looks, well, what is attractive to one might be not attractive to someone else. and vice-versa. Everybody has his own preferences - take flies, they are so fond of sh*t. (I'm not exactly ladylike today) Sometimes these women are both ugly inside and out. That was my case. I had contact with her after the cheating and she is 30 on welfare and cranking out kids. I guess to replace the one she had taken away. I couldn't find a good quality in her. Also look at who Jude law & Ethan Hawke cheated with. Link to post Share on other sites
Adunaphel Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 All things considered, I doubt it. How much higher spiritual connection can you really have when you meet someone at a bar, when you're drunk, and all your interactions are limited to interactions that occur while inebriated? give me a break. I 100% agree that in such a situation you cannot, and will not even try to, appreciate a woman's personality or brains or sense of humor. Some guys would sleep with anything that looks even remotely feminine and is breathing (or is still reasonably warm). But it is not the only possible cheating scenario. Link to post Share on other sites
a4a Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 but it does make little sense though. if you had a partner who was attractive then why need someone else to wax your lance in the first place? or do most men have a sick desire to treat a woman like a slut from time to time? I would think some men think of it as a boost to there ego even if the girl is not so attractive or they just want to get their rocks off...... kinda like porn but live action. I gotta a friend that has a fugly wife and has screwed fugly women to just get a different flavor from time to time. He calls his side "jobs" whores and sluts...... they are just holes to him. Link to post Share on other sites
tinktronik Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 I resent that comment! you made me crack up L . thanks . Link to post Share on other sites
blind_otter Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 "bout it, bout it" ....I still don't know whay that meant .I think perhaps she was trying to start a physical confrontation with me , but really it could mean lets go get popsicles together . :lmao: good personality and trash all around her trailer. According to the urban dictionary: adj.1) down for whatever ("you wanna knock these niggas out?" - "i'm bout it") 2) all about any or all of the hood, being gangsta, keepin it real, being hard or serious ("i wouldn't **** with that cat if i were you, dat boy is bout it") 3) generally better or more "all about" whatever is being compared ( "Them hoes can't front, they know J-lo's ass is (mo') bout it!") 4) made popular and possibly coined by Master P down south on his frist hit single (besides 'ice cream man') "bout it"-- check the song("you bout it? i'm bout it, bout it. We'll say you're 'bout it,' if you're bout it, bout it" -Master P) noun: term used by many wank/wangsters; real cats say "i been bout it" But I think this one is the most appropriate definition, considering the source: 5) A loose ass girl who is about doing every and anything. Similar to hoe ("Me and my homeboys ran a train on the bout it last night.") Link to post Share on other sites
DeeBrod83 Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 How about who Hugh Grant cheated with!?! I think guys usually regret it later when they lose the hot, nice girl they have at home b/c they wanted a 'new hole' to investigate, but I think a lot of it is beer goggles and less attractive women do tend to be more forwardly aggressive b/c they have to be! Hot girls are usually fighting guys off with a stick so she's less open to the idea. And I agree that women cheat too, but in my experience women cheat up more than down. They're more interested in quality.... And Jolie was a down trade! Aniston is beautiful and real, Jolie is trashy looking, even if her lips are awesome. Link to post Share on other sites
a4a Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 I resent that comment! :lmao: thanks for the laugh!! I needed that!!! (you represent that comment too! ) Link to post Share on other sites
Adunaphel Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 I resent that comment! :lmao: Link to post Share on other sites
tanbark813 Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 And I agree that women cheat too, but in my experience women cheat up more than down. They're more interested in quality.... Unless you're a lesbian, you don't really have a place to say. Link to post Share on other sites
blind_otter Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 And to stoopid guy. NO WAY is taking Jolie over Aniston cheating down. She is WAY hotter, though admittedly not as classy. Proof that attractiveness is completely subjective. I have always thought that Jennifer Aniston was fugly. I remember in the mental hospital there was a young manwho was obsessed with her, but he hated himself for his obsession because he thought she was ugly. How bizarre the twisted tortured minds of the SPMI population are. Link to post Share on other sites
DeeBrod83 Posted August 18, 2006 Share Posted August 18, 2006 I'm..... open minded. Not a full blown lesbian. But thanks for the call-out! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts