johan Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 In addition, there are aspects of his culture Alpha is picking and choosing from. He is not in an arranged marriage. He has never mentioned dating someone who shares his background. He "bangs" hot American women, and he deliberately manipulates them to play on their insecurities. That is not cultural. Link to post Share on other sites
alphamale Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Alpha's point of view is that women are to be hated and dominated as a way to win the battle of the genders. That is not cultural. That is emotional. Actually....Alpha's point of view it to be a man, period. Most of the dudes I see running around here are sissified & emasclated to such an extent that they don't even resemble males anymore. I guess part of the reason many women are drawn to me is because of the dominant vibes I give out which are pretty rare these days. Being a man is a state of mind more than anything else. You know, the good old days when men were men and women were women. Link to post Share on other sites
Pyro Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 I am curious to know what actual women (not plastic or blow-up) are attracted to your version of being a man. Link to post Share on other sites
alphamale Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 In addition, there are aspects of his culture Alpha is picking and choosing from. He is not in an arranged marriage. He has never mentioned dating someone who shares his background. just cause certain things "weren't mentioned" does not mean they did not happen. I choose to disclose what I want to whom I want and when i want. Link to post Share on other sites
johan Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 And I agree that blaming it on one's "culture" is a sort of cop out. Yeah, it sort of is. Link to post Share on other sites
pricillia Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Actually....Alpha's point of view it to be a man, period. Most of the dudes I see running around here are sissified & emasclated to such an extent that they don't even resemble males anymore. I guess part of the reason many women are drawn to me is because of the dominant vibes I give out which are pretty rare these days. Being a man is a state of mind more than anything else. You know, the good old days when men were men and women were women. men are still men and women are still women, it is just that we let things get in the way... let it go already! Link to post Share on other sites
burning 4 revenge Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 You know, the good old days when men were men and women were women.and slaves were slaves and gays were queers and jews were christkillers and .... Link to post Share on other sites
johan Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 just cause certain things "weren't mentioned" does not mean they did not happen. I choose to disclose what I want to whom I want and when i want. Well, part of the truth is not much of a truth. If you want to back up your culture claim, then feel free. As it stands, it doesn't appear to hold much water. This the first time you've said much about your culture, that I'm aware of. I admit I haven't read all 14,000+ posts. You rely heavily on people giving you the benefit of the doubt. On most threads, I don't consider that to be a problem. But when you advocate hatred and physical violence, then I think it's in your best interests not to have people making assumptions about where your attitudes come from. When you say insulting things to a girl who is currently being abused, then I think you have some things to answer for. It's not your culture as far as I'm concerned. You chose this, and you know it. You choose it every day. Link to post Share on other sites
amerikajin Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Throw her ass out, she's a feminist! OH LOOK THERE'S A FEMINIST! A FEMINIST! Oooooohhhhh....you see, that shocks you. Don't you see what lies beneath you stupid motherf**kers! Oh, they're going to ban me for calling a woman a feminist. (some random LS female poster) "**** you, you pig. We'll see what's up" You callin me a pig, you FEMINIST! "That's uncalled for" Well that's what you get for talkin back to the man, don't you know! "**** you're not funny. That's why you're a reject. Nobody ever reads your stuff anymore. Political warmongering threads - that's it" Ah, you see, there's still those words, those words, those words... <Walks off the LS message board stage> Link to post Share on other sites
amerikajin Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 The thing is, I'm not a sexist. That's what's so crazy about all this. Link to post Share on other sites
pricillia Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Well, part of the truth is not much of a truth. If you want to back up your culture claim, then feel free. As it stands, it doesn't appear to hold much water. This the first time you've said much about your culture, that I'm aware of. I admit I haven't read all 14,000+ posts. You rely heavily on people giving you the benefit of the doubt. On most threads, I don't consider that to be a problem. But when you advocate hatred and physical violence, then I think it's in your best interests not to have people making assumptions about where your attitudes come from. When you say insulting things to a girl who is currently being abused, then I think you have some things to answer for. It's not your culture as far as I'm concerned. You chose this, and you know it. You choose it every day. waiting for reply from Alpha... Link to post Share on other sites
Guestola Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 I am curious to know what actual women (not plastic or blow-up) are attracted to your version of being a man. My contention is if he was actually that much a stud-muffin, he wouldn't have time to rack up his LS post count. I suspect it's all just one big fantasy played out on an anonymous board. Link to post Share on other sites
Rooster_DAR Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Most of the dudes I see running around here are sissified & emasclated to such an extent that they don't even resemble males anymore. While I don't share all of Alpha's demeanor, I will have to agree with the above statement. I have talked to my sister and her friends and they all seem to feel that many men now days are too feminine, for many women this will put the so called man into friend zone. I don't feel you should have to believe women should be subordinate to you, but a man needs to do manly things but also be able to understand womens feelings and wants, while the woman needs to respect a man masculinity. Again I think it's a balance. Men who use words like "marvelous" or "pretty" will eventually find themselves in friends zone, and I think that's sort of what Alpha's trying to convey. Link to post Share on other sites
johan Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Again I think it's a balance. Men who use words like "marvelous" or "pretty" will eventually find themselves in friends zone, and I think that's sort of what Alpha's trying to convey. You think so? And do you think that balance comes from hitting your woman? Is that a manly thing? So if you slip up and call something marvelous, then should you instantly punch her just to remind her you're still a man? Link to post Share on other sites
burning 4 revenge Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 You think so? And do you think that balance comes from hitting your woman? Is that a manly thing? So if you slip up and call something marvelous, then should you instantly punch her just to remind her you're still a man? :laugh: what if you say "marvelous" or "pretty" after punching her. i could see myself saying that after punching a few girls around here Link to post Share on other sites
Pyro Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 :laugh: what if you say "marvelous" or "pretty" after punching her. i could see myself saying that after punching a few girls around here No, I would just pick her up from off the ground and tell her to go finish doing the dishes and to have my dinner ready for me. Link to post Share on other sites
Rooster_DAR Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 You think so? And do you think that balance comes from hitting your woman? Is that a manly thing? So if you slip up and call something marvelous, then should you instantly punch her just to remind her you're still a man? I don't condone hitting a woman at all unless she is life threating. I think the innocuous intermittent usage of these terms is probably not going to send your girl thinking, but if a guy keeps using them it's not going to look good for him. Sorry, just my POV. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Trust me I grew up in a house with a hardcore feminist who used to hold meetings and they always used to tell women that they were being tricked into thinking they were happy with the men in their lives. Any woman that was happily married or happy in a relationship was being brainwashed by the patriarchy in their eyes. I have seen aspects of the feminist movement that almost no other man has seen. Why paint all females with the same brush-stroke? You've even used the word hardcore, which is exactly what you've experienced. Most women aren't like this and sit somewhere to the right or the left of the feminist line. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Off the subject a litte: I talked about this earlier in the post. It's the church and man that kept women from their natural urges. Women are just as equal (or close to) men in having the urge to have sex, it's a natural part of the human need to procreate. You can only hold something down for so long and it's eventually going to explode, and that's what we are seeing in the later part of our century. Execept, many women don't understand what this little voice inside is saying, so they are in an emotional tug of war between what has been preached to them to be right, and what is their natural tendency. So now since women were shamed to "the good girl status", it's a struggle to them as to why they look at Bob next door and wonder why he looks so appetizing. But instead of doing what they should (acknowleging what their feelings are (natural) and talking to the H about them), they keep it quiet which stirs up all the beginnings of cheating and affairs (Secrecy is driving force). IMO, that why cheaters rationalize, not only to protect what their doing, but to overcome the inner turmoil that they are supposed to be good girls. Assuming some of this is true, could it be that this is what has sparked the whole female revolution? Something to think about I suppose. Cheers! For some women, perhaps you're right about the suppression due to shame over trying to live up to the "good girl" image/affairs/cheating, all of it. It's not for me. I do enjoy making love with someone who I love. Beyond that, I just....can't. Call me cold but as I've stated previously in another post, it's not worth settling for fast food. The ramifications of cheating to everyone around me that I care about isn't worth the moments of selfish emotional and/or physical satisfaction. Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 If possession is 9/10th of the law then if she decides to have the baby against the father's wishes then she should pay 9/10th of the expenses to raise the kid to age 18. What happens now is if she decides to have the baby he'll be paying child support and other expenses that are court-ordered. WHERE S THE EQUALITY IN THAT?!?!?!?!? Alpha, I disagree with you about 99% of the time in regards to relationships of any kind but in this I'm with you. If the woman wants to have the baby due to whatever reason, religious or otherwise and the guy doesn't, she is 100% responsible, fiscally and emotionally. If the guy wants to have the baby and she doesn't, they should enter into a legal binding agreement that upon birth of the child, he will take 100% possession of it. If they both do, it should be a 50/50 split. If neither want the baby, there are other alternatives such as adoption and abortion. Link to post Share on other sites
Rooster_DAR Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 The ramifications of cheating to everyone around me that I care about isn't worth the moments of selfish emotional and/or physical satisfaction. It's good to see you have your head on straight, highly commendable. Link to post Share on other sites
pricillia Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Alpha, I disagree with you about 99% of the time in regards to relationships of any kind but in this I'm with you. If the woman wants to have the baby due to whatever reason, religious or otherwise and the guy doesn't, she is 100% responsible, fiscally and emotionally. If the guy wants to have the baby and she doesn't, they should enter into a legal binding agreement that upon birth of the child, he will take 100% possession of it. If they both do, it should be a 50/50 split. If neither want the baby, there are other alternatives such as adoption and abortion. So it comes down to finances....what about love and compassion. Link to post Share on other sites
pricillia Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 I am sorry I think that there are still real men out there who are not one extreme or the other. No beating or verbal abuse... Just loving caring men who understand compassion and who don't need to abuse for thier own pleasure/insecurity... all men have a soft side the trick is not to be afraid of it... and carry on... Link to post Share on other sites
Trialbyfire Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 So it comes down to finances....what about love and compassion. Love and compassion are people who take possession of the baby. If I were to get pregnant by accident, I would keep the baby no matter what. If anything, if the guy doesn't want the baby, I would be selfish enough to not want him as part of our lives. I can take care of both the child and myself without having to drag a reluctant man into the equation. Link to post Share on other sites
alphamale Posted December 10, 2006 Share Posted December 10, 2006 Yea, well you know what?? It is because of men and the technical advances they made that women can now try to claim equality. Almost everything around us was made by men: computers, cars, buildings, a/c, appliances, textiles, airplanes, baby formula, disposable diapers, frozen foods, etc.... the list is endless and men made 95% of this stuff. Now women want equality after men have made their lives easier and enabled them to work at jobs they couldn't do 50 yrs ago. For example, the invention of the automatic transmission & electric starter enabled women to start driving cars cause they did not have the strength to operate the manual versions. Now we see women in the military driving air conditioned M1A1 tanks. I didn't see any women in 1915 clamoring to get into the army so they could fight in trenches with mustard gas all around. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts